i_love_burritos

Dude, it's the Asian Fonz. So the legends were true. Can you waterski over a shark? Subtle. I barely managed to detect that one. EDIT: Eyyyyy.

Did some more research on this, and lookee. The Norwegian guy you see on the televison prasing Obama is Thorbjørn Jagland, the Chairman of the Nobel Committee. This guy's a goon. His only previous experience seems to be being a bencher in the Norwegian Parliment. Not only this, but was only appointed this role in February of this year. Found out some more by the way. This clown intended to give the European Union, yes the whole of the European Union the Nobel Peace Prize. Translated Article here Another thing. There were 205 nominations for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. They were due the 1st of February. Which is just 14 days after Obama was sworn in. Ridiculous.

Obama, of course. Did you really need to answer that ?

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/10/all-over-the-world.html#more You know, I would have swallowed all of that horse[cabbage] if not for the last sentence. And, in the darkness that still threatens, know hope. Know hope ? What do any of us know. My god the overpowering hope, such a beacon in these dark times. So much hope, the world is overflowing with hope. It's causing me to cry hope. Sweet Jesus. Perhaps the next UN convention we can all gather round', hold hands and sin [bleep]ing Kumbaya by the fire. Who's bringing the marshmallows ?

I usually hate blogs and bloggers, but I do like your pictures :thumbup:

10/10

Ohh that's a good one. English and Australian accents are hawt <3: My theory is validated ... Pure_MageUK ... ecccchh. This is strange. I love watching Scrubs. Hilarious. I also love stupid people for the opportunites they provide me with. :lol:

This. Unbelievable. It's even worse than the incident where Arafat won the Peace Prize.

haha, you too? Man I loved that movie. Yeah, it does have Zooey Deschanel in it. Last movie I saw was Up. 10/10 for the first 30 minutes. Exceptionally [cabbage]ty till the end, punctated by stifled half-laughs.

It is a fine game.

Haha, just made that up. But it's a common "scaffold". [Obscenity / Blasphemy ], [time period / minority / ethnic group / THE SUFFRAGETTES are very popular !!!] called and they want [ subscription / membership / something back]

I think I deserve I Nobel Prize in the field of medicine. I discovered the occaisonal burning sensation when I urinate is caused by dehydration. Hey, look. I've cured millions of people from Gonorrhea, Clamidia and most types of genital herpes. Hip Hip Hooray !!! EDIT: FOR HE'S A JOLLY GOOD FELLOW, FOR HE'S A JOLLY GOOD FELLOW FOR HE'S A JOLLY GOOD FELLOW (PAUSE), AND SO SAY ALL OF US AND SO SAY ALL OF US, AND SO SAY ALL OF US.

This is quite surprising ... Google Search Article So what do you think, TIF ?

Looking real slick there, How2PK. Dear god, the 1950's called and said they want their lingo back. Trying to think of something funny to say, a witticism perhaps. Quip maybe ?

Nope, if you are talking about the hegemony I left because it was 02:30 here then. Dammnit, foiled again. deathdrow, funniest thing I've heard today. Sounded like you had an awesome time. Was in tears at your description of the hobos, my imagination proabably helped aswell.

TheMather1 is reduced to tears.

It's a non-issue because it wasn't even [bleep]ing funny. No such thing as "Australian Humour"

Yeah you can. Previously pseudoephedrine [the active ingredient] was found as a little blue "dot" inside most tablets [in it's very pure form]. So all you needed to do was, take the blue "dot" out and boil it in alcohol, [untill it's saturated]. Then you have methamphetamine.

People have died from seat belts. It isn't as rare as you think. Getting out of a submerged or burning car is hard enough as it is. Forcing you to wear a seat belt causes you to be in more danger in those situations. Besides, I've heard of those occurrences way more than I've ever heard of a human projectile killing other people. Yes, but on road accidents are far more common than these burning car, and underwater scenarios you have in mind. It might be a fairly common occurence, but my point is you can never be fully prepared for it. So, take it like this. Once you get in the car you have two choices. To wear your seatbelt and risk crashing and burning and frying to a crisp because you couldn't escape or not wear your seatbelt and get vaulted at high speeds at tarmac [even for back seat passengers, the headrest is lethal]. But, I would rather take the "risk" of wearing my seatbelt to avoid serious injury in the event of a much more common type of accident than actually risk my saftey not wearing my seatbelt in he event of a lesser common accident. You also forget, that the type of accident is highly dependant on weather conditions, the actual vehicle, the road, and the outside environment, and not only on the driver. For example, I would opt to wear my seatbelt if I was riding shotgun in a Toyota Camry and travelling a medium speed within the suburbs. Of course this changes if I'm in a 4WD on some country road. It's funny how you complained about when I debate on OT, but now it almost seems like you're following me around just to argue with me. lolwut ? And what's "even you" supposed to mean? I don't know, sounded like a good idea at the time.

Yeah, I mean the Police's best album Synchronicity, has more allusions to killing, pain and fear than most of today's "horrorcore". Read the article, sounds quite sad. But you wouldn't know what the guy was thinking or his motivations behind it, people will just look at the "image", and make attacks on that. Off Topic : Wow, warrior, that has happened to me too. Gets annoying after a while, this setup.

Holidays. <.< Someone link me to that "most frequent poster today" Still figuring out the board. Also, I pressed the show all smiley, and now all I can see is the crappy ones.

1.) People don't plan for themselves to be wearing seatbelts and then, hey oh' look, you're underwater. What I'm saying is, that its useless to make assumptions about whether seatbelts are helpful in a situation, because the purpose of the seatbelt is to avoid these unpredictable accidents. 2.) Defective seatbelts ? DEFECTIVE SEATBELTS "CAN CAUSE MAJOR INJURIES EVEN IN NORMAL ACCIDENTS" ??? - C'mon, Zierro, even you know how ridiculous this sounds. EDIT: I find most of the arguments people have against wearing seatbelts, is that they restrict your escape in a crash etc... A human body flying through a windscreen at 60 km/hr target for bitumen is as good as, whatever you people say. Here in Australia, it's mandatory for all people inside the car. On your American part, I also see that it is a type of primitve rebellion. Waaaah, our government cant tell us what to do. Every citizen is independant. Why do we have to rely on someone else telling about our own safety.

Yes ! Political Compass. Thanks a_local_guy.

HAHAHAHHA. I'm guessing Silverwits

5/10 - dont like it too much. What happened to your OOTHHG sig ? Or was that someone else ? :-k