The flaw in what you're saying is that your believing a two thousand year old book that says some guy who said he was "god's" kid, turned water into wine. for all you know he could have just had a jug of water told everyone to turn around then switched it into a jug of wine. There's nothing proving this happened, however with science we have solid proof of most of what's involved with science. whereas with the bible, you are saying that we should believe this two thousand year old book that we don't even have an original copy of, and it's been translated and rewritten so many times that we can't be sure of anything in it. who knows what the bible really was. it could've just been a popular novel at the time, it also could have just been some stuff people made up. the thing is there is NO proof for it or god at all.