Nazgul740

ok four words... WHY WOULD I CARE? seriously get off ya high horsey and be informative if you want to.. otherwise this thread is spam... its like me posting Title: cabbage is purple Obviously I know how to get purple cabbage but do you know how... nananana uggg :wall:

nearly pked and poisened while rcing got into abyiss and lagged out - logg back in 3 hps... tele to house died died at black demons 2x loseing about 1.2mill worth of stuff... they always move and i forget to check window Died at black dragons a few times... was hallying so not much loss Died at barrows before... that was awful #-o went down to 6 hps at fire giants when i didn't realize that randoms made the giants aggressive again... had my robin set and 22k arrows in my invent... ring of life teleported me out at the last second...

but they won't do that... ever :x youknowwho PostPosted: 22/5/05 Post subject: Re: Combat triangle outdated and useless? Nazgul740 wrote: 11 year old l33t sp3@ck1ng deranged crack addicts Thumbs Up Dancing Love

I am inclined to laugh at you, but shall refrain from doing so at the moment. Look at F2P Mage. Maximum damage, 16. Slowest attack speed. 200 - 300 coins per cast. Negligible armour. Barely any equipment boost to Magic. Pathetic holding spell. Now look at Rangers and Warriors in F2P, come back and tell me the F2P Combat Triangle is balanced. Yes it is balanced... most levels around 70-90 don't carry dragon hide with them while pking... at lets say only 59 mage (i got around 65 combat) It hits on rune a ton... Holding spell isn't that bad... the rune skimitars attack doesn't hit well even on mages and if they have say a rune kite it negates it a bit more... also prayer runs out FAST in f2p... if somone wants to keep prot from mage on it means sacrificing most of their offensive prayers... It is balanced... 100%

Atm the combat triangle is like a giant floating bridge... Held up by sticks of butter in a hot day... The butter melts after awhile and jagex goes and plops some more under the bridge trying to keep it up... Enough with the combat triangle already? Why can't jagex just say I am so sick of the people who say "omg range isn't supposed to win against a mage" If you have EVER fought a mage who hasn't switched armor or run while being made a human pincushion it's news to me Also there is no balance in this triangle... Way back when i first joined rs members (had played in f2p for about 6 months) The pking triangle was almost balanced... Mages were just a tad underpowered then since they still didn't have mystic and didn't get it for a looooonnnggg time... Melee's best weapon was the dragon long... decent specing power not so fast hits... Dragon daggers were there but i never remember using one all that much... odd... :? Range was still decent with two specs in a row... they didn't own but were one of the two powerhouses Mage was a bit under powered as said above... They didn't have tb, or ice spells the mage arena still had the ladder... Then jagex threw the whole circle outa wack... Whips, ice, dbows....? None of it is balanced... you want balance look at f2p... the combat system is perfect there... 100% perfect... all styles are different and no one combat system kills the others... Sure there are an amazing amount of teleporting, swearing, ignorant, agressive, semi-pure, numbsculs, who's owners are all 11 year old l33t sp3@ck1ng deranged crack addicts... but after that most of the guys are pretty cool to tie in with the thing waaaaayyy at the top... the combat triangle is the bridge and these new weapons are the butter rapidly melting like players interest (when something doesn't work) so jagex has to pop in some more butter

Oh god. I pluck mine.. HAHA. :XD: I don't think anyone else notices because I keep it so well trimmed :thumbsup: same here but i got tired of plucking every few days so i got like a mini-beard there :thumbsup:

Oh my god... get a freaking life will you!? I LOVE it when some gay little punk who has absolutely no understanding of economics decides to call someone else "cheap" and that they "don't deserve" updates F2p makes enough money from adds to pay for ALL servers... YES little kiddy that includes your oh so precious p2p server... They could run runescape off f2p alone... the wonderful p2p is for profit only... F2p'ers are hard working gamers who enjoy the game even if they don't get all the items they could... EVERY single level that they earn is two to three times as hard as every level you get while using a whip or pcing your exp... I almost never see f2p'ers asking for updates... normally they are quite happy with the decent solid game that they have... F2p is balanced pking... all 3 combat types have a chance against one another... I know alot of guys in real life who play f2p... They aren't bad kids... many of them would get members but either their parents say no or they can't afford the $5 a month... WOW, does that shock you that some people out there can't afford to pay 5 dollars... guess we aren't all lucky middle class Americans eh? Get your head out of your pathetic, slushy, overweight, [developmentally delayed]ed, the worlds a wonderful place buttox and stop being a stuck up, socially rejected [puncture]... Have a nice day :x

Well i was kinda bored today - irritating people on the computers limiting my internet time... So i got to work on photoshop since i couldn't play rs... I did the first one second in rl it looks alot better than the first try which is right under it... The second image i was trying for a grundgy hellboy style look... I pretty much got what i was looking for

Tower is sorta on the left side of the sig... it looks really blury for some reason... on my laptop its much more highlighted... As fr the 30k thing.. yeah we have... but i designed a totally kick but sig and designed t around 50kb i can just save for web and such but i havn't had a chance yet

bland text no blending no color difference radial blur bg? only way you could have made it more beginer was to add a lens flare.. thank god you didn't use google and search for some tutorials

Yes i KNOW its not sig size... :notalk: So anyway experimenting with colors and seeing how many different ones i could cram into a piece of work without making it fall apart... I think it turned out all right but eh... on the right i sorta decided to go off track and created a sorta tower type thingy... it was rather fun to tweak around... my colors have been acting up recently and ive been loseing all my fragile lighting when im posting so meh..

I know what you mean but that render on a backround looks very nice. yeah probably one of the best color choices that i have ever seen Now aside from that I agree with nadril abit... Thre isnt a light source though it could use one... And alot of random brushing... it fits really well and looks quite decent but overall it doesn't take much work

mm... well i think it depends on your range level overall... I lost about 4-6 on average from my c-bow when i was rangeing blues.. i gave 82 shots to a lvl 99 ranger and he killed about 7 and only lose 10 shots...

IMO it is. Range can hit from a distance, and most of the time take absolutely 0 damage. With melee you have a chance to die and lose your stuff every time. Also, melee has more high-level weapons, such as dragon scimitars, etc, while range's dragon bolts and bow is still going to come out. ha ha take 0 damage? yes training but have you ever pked, its easy for mage to not get hit with ice spells but with range as soon as you attack the meleer is right up by you and unless you want to run around trying to not get hit (which is pointless because once you stop theyll hit you) its impossible to "not get hit" And this all goes back to the triangle! Range doesn't beat melee... it never has and never will. It simply wasn't designed to do so. Go back to the triange, mage loses against range because of the dragon hide. Yet range beats mage because they just pwn them. Mage beats warrior because mage can freeze and the armour reacts with the mages spells. However warrior pwnz range because of the thin armour he has on. In short, range was not, has never been designed to kill a warrior! Get over it, use range to kill mages because thats what they're ment to do. Range is not underpowered. Go kill a mage and you'll own them. Yeah but there is a problem with that... because when jagex made mage a thing that you use expendables and never get a chance to pick up or use agin then they scewed rangers... No mage fights a ranger in their mage clothes look at mage bank... they just switch- wala melee time... and good luck trying to hit them then... Also melee is able to use rangers defencive armor against mages... hell with the bracers they can now get a +2 str added in for some silly reason... D-hide armor should give negatives in strength and attack levels... Its stilly to so totally scew mages by having an armor that blocks 2\3'ds of all casts and then let them use melee weapons as well... I've seen a pker in mystic try and barrage a guy... hit him once splash all his other trys and get k0'ed 2 seconds later by a 32-30 from dds...

I disagree lets see how he positions the dust devil before making him change that... I think it will look fine

It looks very stiff to me... no flow and motion to the art... just a guy in a pose... For some reason with this forum its exactly was i expected... I think the colors are also a tad bit too bright... Wolverine has always been the one with emotional trama a harsh past that haunts him... not so sure your pallete (sp?) conveys this too well

yep they are quite a bit better

lighting on the first one is damn perfect... hit the flameing nail on the head you did! Awsome job man... 2nd the lighting is just a taddd bit too harsh for me... just a bit 3rd is awsome... i would like to see what it looks like with a sepia filter on it maybe... and some scroll edges or something likes its off of parchment... overall flippen sweet :lol:

Yeah im trying that out tonight if i get enough time... I heard that the speacial completely kicks major but... Does it make someones range defense go into the negative if it hits them?

yep saw it today myself... still i wonder what update they have planned for c-bows

I've heard quite a few negative comments on the types of range weapons that jagex has come out with... The rune c-bow is too slow, msb spec doesn't hit, so and so costs too much... So I took it among myself to start testing one of these theories. Since I don't pk and the special of the msb doesn't really matter to me I decided to go test out crossbows. After spending about an hour in world 99 edge screaming out ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¢â¬Åbuying rune c-bow 55!ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬ÃâÃ

one of the best vector i've seen

I'm pretty sure from when ive used them (not that much ill admit) that they were SLOWER than a mlb

end of the first paragraph in the bts Now this could mean two things A. Dark bow is a c-bow... I find this highly unlikely, c-bows atm are just too slow and expensive to be any use to anyone... Not being able to trigger the effect of the bolt is just a killer B. Regular C-bows get an update! YAY! So what would it be... In your opinion does power mean just that plain strikeing power... To be quite frank that doesn't mean anything... Unless you get consistant hits no one will ever use it... Would it be the bolts getting new updates... Doesn't say dragon bolts on the bts so i don't think they will be involved in this... Thoughts?

Mouth looks alot better Maybe add a slight really really light gray to the cape? The white looks a bit odd but its mostly because of the bg being the same color