Danqazmlp

I don't get it.

Don't a lot of major soccer games end up with riots? Lots of people take things too seriously. I would say it is a very small minority of games which do. But often those are started not because of the game but because the rioters find it 'fun'. Alcohol and large crowds are often the problem. Although they do take it too seriously too I will admit, the managers and coaches I have never seen be unprofessional. If they have, I would be confident to say they would be fired.

Exactly, the reporters are off screen as they usually are in press conferences, so it was not her wearing the hat that got her fired, but him noticing. But from an outsiders standpoint, he looks like a stuck up twit. The first rule of sport is to respect the opposition, he certainly doesn't seem to if just a hat from an opposition makes him refuse questions from a reporter. If this was football in the premier league and a manager refused a question due to the reporter wearing another teams hat, there would be uproar and he would probably be ripped to pieces. The problem with American football is people thinking it is more than it is. It's a sport. The firing imo is just a small thing, sue the radio station, that is all she can do.

People there take their sports seriously. If Joe Biden had worn a John McCain pin during the election, do you think he'd be vice president? The difference is that the only person that really saw the hat was the coach. If you see the video, nobody apart from the coach can really see the hat. The radio station didn't fire her because of the hat, but because the coach said what he did to the hat. Also, I would call the guy more than a redneck after watching the video, I would call him a lot more. It is a sport, no need to talk to a reporter like that.

Good luck all on getting it done.

Time for her to get a lawyer and make some good money off him and the team. That's what I'd do.

Indeed. I hope everybody is prepared for months of stress, sending and receiving numerous peices of identification and income certification, lost mail and many phone calls with Northern Irish employees.

If that is the case then I will definitely be getting the game. I like to make characters in RPG's look as much like me as possible and put myself into the game.

It is not on a major network (At least here in the UK) so it is fairly unknown here.

Everything sounds pretty cool except the no character customisation. That is one of the key points I like when playing RPG games.

Where has the rum gone? Good job on the forums Peter.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1442449/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spartacus:_Blood_and_Sand http://www.starz.com/originals/spartacus This is one of the more obscure programs on television at the moment. In the UK it is only found on "Bravo", in the US I have no idea what channel it is aired on. The program is semi-historical, in that it is based on real events which occured around 70BC, real people. It does however glorify a few events and social constructs, but the main plot is fairly true to form. It is VERY violent and contains at least one sex scene per two episodes. Because of the grapic nature, I expect its reviews went down by a fair amount. It is however a very entertaining program. The fight scenes as you would expect are very good and very graphic. They are very 300'esque. To start with, the series started to stagnate around the middle while the storyline came together, but by the end I left the final three episodes wishing they hadn't finished and hoping the next week would come around faster. The first series has ended with a great cliffhanger, If you haven't seen the first series, here is Wiki's explination of it: I wondered if anybody else had seen the series? I'm looking forward to the second series after the Prequel series has finished. P.s Can we put any spilers in hide tags, being a rather unknown program, it is aired at different times in different countries.

235 Smiley face.

Updated it for you Nadril, I hope you don't mind.

It's a Beta for the reason. I'm sick and tired of game companies putting out demos and calling them Betas, then when a proper beta comes around people complain that it doesn't work. That's not what they're designed for and it's a trend in this "generation" of gaming that really annoys me. True, but a bug like that should have been dealt with much earlier than the Beta. At that stage you were forced to play the tutorial before being able to play the rest. This wasn't even early on into the beta, but was about halfway through if I remember rightly. to be honest though, the game didn't feel very good either. It is another DotA type game, but much less polished. The camera and controls didn't feel right either.

I got into the Beta of it but the tutorial was bugged and not completable which put me right off. Even in the beta you should be able to play.

Do you have ANY evidence to support this? I agree, If you want to bash Jagex go ahead as long as you have some sort of evidence.

Some of the most obscure games on that list are also games that I would put on mine. Small soldiers, Herc's, war of the monsters and Grim fandango are all gems of games. I remember renting Small soldiers when I was younger and IIRC it even had co-op.

New screenies http://www.gamesradar.com/f/gamescom-2010-new-fable-3-screens-bring-massive-hammers-beautiful-environments-and-zombie-raves/a-2010081712212670073 The environments look fantastic.

While driving to work today, somehow the end of Runescape got into my head. A few ideas ran through my head on how Runescape could end and the shockwaves those ways could leave in the MMO community. Fist, I will explain my main idea of how I thought the game could end in a great way. In a few years time when Jagex see the games market stagnating and can foresee a decline, they decide that instead of a slow decline in the game, to go out with a bang. They decide to let super-powered boss monsters go on a rampage through the game and let the players wage a giant war to stop them. Accounts would be given a few lives, but after them, their account would be permanently dead. After the end of the war, whether the players or bosses win, the servers are turned off. It is a very bare-bones ending, but it started my mind rolling with possibilities and ideas such as: - A second runescape some years after in the same game world, but in the aftermath, the major cities destroyed, very few surviving humans, bare basic civilization. New accounts could be linked with their predecessors to set up ancestry for them. (Ancestor died/survived great war) - J-Mods controlling the bosses to give them extra challenge - Tie the war into the Runescape lore, bosses related to Lucien after becoming a full god and going to full scale war, the servers turning off being a cliffhanger with Guthix appearing (supporting the sequel idea) - Let those that survive continue in the game until they next die? Ok, all of those mini-ideas would be pretty major, but then it got me thinking about how radical the idea would be seen through gaming media, giving (hopefully) Jagex some very good publicity not wanting to let their game go slowly into the abyss. After that, I thought about how would other players want the game to end? Would the majority collectively want the game to very slowly decline, servers slowly going off-line until eventually they all go after many years? Would Jagex had the servers over to players to pay for them in their own way? Big bang or slow decline? Or do you have other ideas as to how the game will end?

I feel you will probably get better and more helpful advice in the tech section here.

Managed to get a bottle of mickey finns and a 70cl bottle of peach schnapps for about £5 for the two the other day, still haven't had the occasion to drink them but they are both very nice. A freind introduced me to this a few weekends ago: The strawberry and lime is oh so nice.

We do not condone the advertising or discussion of manipulated items here on these forums. Locking this.

Who was selected this week?

I wholeheartedly agree with TS on account sharing. I would never want anybody else to do something on my account for me. It would cheapen all the achievements I would achieve. It is also just such a huge security risk. We may as well be putting our items in their banks when giving out our passwords. I have often seen people using other people's accounts in clans. I could reel off a big list of accounts which have been used by multiple people. I don't really dislike them doing it, but I personally would not do so. I have been on somebody else's account before. I even had access to their bank as I was given their bank pin. However, the situation did call for it and was only for good. I once ran a clan, and two members of it were very good friends. One of them lent the other a guthan's set of armour to do the Fight caves, and at the time (this is going back many years), the set was one of the most expensive things in the game. The person who had been lent the set then claimed to have been hacked and lost it after logging out at the fight caves (He had a bank pin so they couldn't access the bank). They trusted me enough to go on his account, give me the bank pin and check his bank to see if he had been hacked, or whether he had stolen and sold it. He had in fact been hacked (as far as I could see and make from what he told me). In this event, sharing the account did no harm, but did good. So it can be very circumstantial.