Satenza

You pointed out no flaws or the apparent contradictions in the argument. All you did was say it was up to Tallest to make a topic about your problem and called it a Guilani for him suggesting that. Then at the same time complaining about spam, by spamming. If anyone's contradicting themselves it is you.

I don't know why it matters if this stays open or not. Don't like it, don't post. It will slip away. Bubsa show your disatisfaction in the way of a report instead of a bump, it's not exactly rocket science.

Learn to play instruments. To be honest, beyond repair. I wouldn't class it as music. Just give up.

What are the reasons for Kennedy and Clinton to be said in the same breath at Bush?

Well, you do make other peoples topics worse.

Did the 20% that found the error get it wrong because there is no error?

That's why Chinese people are smart. :wink: No racism, even though it's true most of the time Since when is China so smart, have so seen the state of China? Anyway, it's more a mechanical device than a computer very good nevertheless.

What about creative mathematical intelligence? Thats still creative intelligence, i have nothing but respect for people who discover new mathematical principles and even more for those who apply them to the universe.

You can't measure creativity in numbers. Really, all you need to know to score well on IQ tests is mathematical knowledge and a good understanding of the English language. It has been proven over and over again that it does not account for intelligence in high risk; high pressure situations not to mention they are also culturally determined and tests vary from continent to continent because of this. If I were to take an IQ test again I would bet my life my IQ would be lower because I have not studied mathematics in almost two years now, does that make me less intelligent than I was two years ago? Maybe so but I hold creative intelligence in more light than mathematical intelligence.

Maybe you are the one that is stupid? :D I did take an actual IQ test provided by my college, I'm not preaching my IQ being representative of what I or anyone else is, infact the IQ system is an incredibly flawed system on which to base intelligence from individual to individual.

What the hell.

That argument still supports the banning of it, i was pointing out why the argument does not float.

I fail to see how cars and sex-change have anything to do with eachother. Especially when being hit by a car is usually done by accident Your saying because hypothetically people kill others for being transexuals and maybe a few real times thats happened we should ban the operation for their own protection. When really that argument is extremley nieve, should we also ban homosexuality because people kill others for that? People kill people for every possible reason under the sun, your argument makes no sense becauce it can be adapted to every situation and would lead to the banning of everything considered different. People have the liberty to do what they wish, what you are proposing can easily be seen as some sort of Nazi or Fascist regime.

People die from stepping out onto a road full of cars, shall we ban cars too?

I scored 154 at one i took at college last year, however IQ tests are about as valuable as a report on the uses of liberty from George Bush. They are flawed in so many ways.

What If's don't equate to arguments. People do accept transexuals, i myself find it a bit weird but since when is any form of offence justification to ban something?

Mind to explain why? Because that's just wrong, as they with their own kind of gender sexual organs, not both.... Plus i bet alot of the time people think theyre "trapped in the opposite sex's body", its psychological because they're probably traumatised from past experiences or something. They should be given a proper test written by experts in that area. They are, infact i think all people who undego extensive surgery for cosmetic reasons go through a series of phychiatric tests ect

FDR and Wilson in my opnion were the greatest presidents, Lincoln stopped slavery yes, but his real intentions are always cloudy, not to mention the fact that during the civil war he was a dictator with little regard for the constitution. The worst has to be Bush. No one screwed up as much as him, not even Nixon. He's like a re-encarnation of Adams. Farewell liberty, welcome trillions of dollars of debt and a war that will never ever be won. I don't know of any president that could be worse than Bush.

I agree So ignorant.

I don't realize. Sorry.

LOL YES.

How do you know?

First World War - Digging Trenches.

Do you think people still be able to wear speedo's? :-k

Yes it is ridiculous. Good luck with liberty America.