Satenza

I disagree, if you are confident mentally, aware of your surroundings then you will be more confident of your own abilities (whether thats going into a automatic reaction or not, perhaps this will redefine that automatic reaction?).

It's not about needing to remember things in the situation. You should read it first. It is mostly abaout preparing yourself for an attack. So when one does happen, you are bulging with confidence.

Whats up with the weird monk guy, and those skirts.

I don't find Depp attractive, his cheekbones are too pronounced.. So there you go :P

That would be sweet. Early one mornin' the sun was shinin', I was layin' in bed Wond'rin' if they'd changed at all If there brains was still dead. Those noobs tried to make all our lives So incredibly rough They never could afford rune armour There bankbook wasn't big enough. And I was standin' on the side of the road Noobs begging me like fools Heading out for the East Coast Lord knows I've killed some tools to get me through Tangled up in noobs!

Don't listen to them! Anyway, when i get some money, i will buy since it's for good charity. I looked at the preview for Walking In Memphis and that was great.

It's nice to hear Harrison singing in something else :) Jimi Hendrix - Star Spangled Banner (At Woodstock).

PenÃÆÃâÃâélope Cruz i have to admit is beautiful. Even when she played a nun in Pedro AlmodÃÆÃâÃâóvar "All About My Mother" she was stunning. It's her personality as well thats attractive.

My dog

Now go post Harrison Ford on the most attractive male topic Adam :P

You like ex-child star druggy attractive? :P Nah, she is pretty cool. In a rock and roll kinda way.

Yeah man. If it was in a homosexual way you'd have better taste. He looks like a cartoon character from that viking show.

How do people still refer to him like a God?

Google for maoism, that's what the Chinese people follow/followed. Pick up the right verb if you want to call the current system with open rather liberal marketing system "maoism". Note: Your dear Mao managed to kill tens of millions more than Stalin and Hitler did together. Surley not, Mao killed only a few million. Mao's communism was a mix of Marx and Lenin communism.

Mao was a disgusting figure who orchestrated some of the worst crimes since Hitler and Stalin and remains in some sort of God status for shifting the blame of the cultural revolution onto the gang of four (who were to blame as well) by Mao's successors. Communism is so incredibly stupid because it can't fail, we can blame China and Russia for not being in the right stage for communism to occur (as an antithesis to capitalism). Mao failed many times with unrealistic goals and plans (he was really a worse version of Stalin in that sense) , which led to the starvation of millions of chinese people. Not to mention the communist party in China has become the reverse of what communism really is. China is the new global proletariat, something which Communism set to destroy, but in China's case, only promoted and has given into the exploitation of their citizens by the rest of the world.

According to the BBC articles I read, they never wasted 7.5 million. That's just what they would have spent had they pursued the idea. I only mention it because theres a huge difference between putting an idea on paper, and spending 7.5 million on developing it. I don' think it was known if it ever went into developing stages.

So remember, next time you're ilegally forced into handing your tax reports in. "My money is going to something useful, to build a damn gay bomb!"

Did you know America tried to develop a gay bomb in 1994 and wasted 7.5 million on it? It would be dropped on enemy soliders and they would find each other so attractive they would lose all organization and begin passionatley loving each other. Yeah, thats not a joke either.

Ew. Bono.

Did you know that Mussolini erradicated the mafia's active existance in Italy, it was then later re-established by America during the war who provided it with money to help the war effort.

The Mayans didn't believe the world would end in 2012, they belived their age of the world would end (the fourth age) and enter the 5th age which they percived to be final age of the world. All they have done is put a limit on their age of the world. Well guess what, i say we enter the 5th age tommorow. Better get running.

So, has humanity ever lived under such ideal and nice conditions? This is a thought experiment called the state of nature used by some philosophers (such as Locke, Rousseau, Hobbes) to justify the existance of the state as it is. Realistically this would never work. At the start it maybe the greatest form of liberty you could desire. Then people start wanting to interfere in your liberty. When that happens there is a need for a state to limit that interferance and punish those who go to far. As Hobbes said life in the state of nature would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short". Your idea is (like communism) based on utopia, therefore set to fail.

Descartes ontological argument for the existance of God. It uses deductive reasoning to attempt to prove existance. 1. Whatever I clearly and distinctly perceive to be contained in the idea of something is true of that thing. 2. I clearly and distinctly perceive that necessary existence is contained in the idea of God. 3. Therefore, God exists. Of course to understand clear and distinct ideas you would have to read the whole of his book "Meditations". Although, reading it all would probably show you how stupid his argument really is. Mainly because to have clear and distinct ideas in the first place God must exist, and so his predicate relies on his conclusion. Lets remember next to an illogical belief stands faith.

Vacation with friends in summer

West side of London is the way to go, places like Knightsbridge is a major place for fashion labels.