Rebdragon

If you guys freak out every time someone of the female gender posts a picture, I swear...

Can't say I've had many extremely embarrassing things happen to me... but if I were to pick one, it'd be the time I messed up during a class debate by directly attacking two people on the other team :lol: . Ya, personally wasn't that embarrassing, but a good portion of the class found it pretty funny :-w .

This thread is disgusting... good luck keeping those eating habits later in life -_-'. [small stomach power meol :o!]

Watch out, the last guy to make a thread on Tip.it about how much better this place is than RuneHQ got killed in his sleep by mercenary assassins, most likely hired by the RHQ staff. Just sayin', early warning.

Totally forgot about that one. Yup, my eyes got a little wet during that movie. 'Little wet'? Pfft, you were bawling like the rest of us, and you know it. Radio, hands down. Schindler's List might've beat it, but it wasn't teary sad; the story was just depressing, yet inspirational.

Rise Against... pretty much every song ever written by them... all at once.

It's not a problem, just peculiar :-k . Anyways, this has been posted here... way too many times. If it's a year old, and it's a story like this, odds are it's been posted before. Ah well, have fun here and all, just don't turn into one of those guys who makes news threads every day when we all already have newspapers at home, m'kay :P ?

in case this isn't a joke, ash is a guy....... :| I'm not an idiot, bi, or homo. it is indeed, mr observant, a joke, or must I put italics to make sure that the 95% of the internet that isn't mentally handicapped will get the joke? You're 95% must be a great guess, because, including me, three out of three so far did not see that as a joke, but rather it appeared to be humorous irony.

EDIT: Sorry newbie, lil' harsh post -_-". Quick question: Why did you join a Runescape fansite forum and start off by going to the OT to post this, a year old tired story?

I don't get this stuff about wanting to fly before you die, or wanting to be asleep at the end of your life. It'd be really interesting to be self-aware at the point of death, for me anyways :-k . I suppose it's symbolically like having control all the way to the end.

What moves do you need? Seriously! No bad man stands a flippen chance against a chick with pms, woke up on the wrong side of the bed and is more aggressive than a lion on heat. Grab for the badongas and CRUSHHHHH!!!! :shock: :P Remind me not to cross you.

You defined faith as "the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen(ie God)". Evidence is logical. Faith is not. I was merely commenting on the contradiction of your definition. And for the record, I have nothing against religion whatsoever, just faith. Religion and faith are two very different things my friend. The if "I can't see it I don't believe it" attitude is about more than 'seeing', it's about using any and all of our physical senses to detect something, including the ability to understand [as noted by venomai]. Thusfar, our physical senses have been proven to be able to detect wind, but no physical sense has ever been proven to detect any form of supernatural being, nor has one ever come to be understood. That was the point being made. Which is why it was an annoying way to phrase your post :| . Sarcasm is for friendly, cursory, humorous remarks, not intelligent debate.

:lol: One- faith is illogical, and the knowledgable believers that I've been taught by attest to that. Don't turn it into something it's not, like evidence. It's no evidence- it's belief in face of contradictory evidence or in lieu of the lack of evidence to begin with. Two- Air is physical -composed of the same matter as you and I-, thus it can be recognized by the senses. 'Nother analogy please, that one doesn't help your case. Three- Calm down. Screaming OH MY GOSH! doesn't make you look any smarter, nor does saying such a thing as "case solved", as if to say you've one and there's no way you can be incorrect. That's not a proper way to debate, and I believe everyone here would prefer if tried not to act like that, if only for this discussion. :roll: It was a serious question. I despise this attitude. With a passion. Largely because it's just so prevalent, but the idea itself is just annoying. If we were to leave everyone to their own beliefs, if we were to avoid discussion, debating, and teaching, no one would ever learn. If the pre-med student was never corrected by his teacher or peers in his belief that the heart is not an essential organ of the human body, would it be "wrong" to try and correct his belief? Or should we simply let him be with what he believes true, no matter how detrimental said belief could be to himself or others? In connection to this topic, yes, discussion of the supernatural should end, because it is just that- supernatural. Etymoligically, "above and beyond nature". We can not, and never will understand it while in this current state, and never will as long as we exist on this level. What we can argue, though, is human logic and understanding, and how it relates to the belief of these supernatural beings, which is what is being done on this thread. They were killed as a scapegoat tactic, not for their religion.

Look at many Eastern world religions, such as Confucianism, Buddhism, Zen, Taoism, Jainism, Sikhism and even Shinto [to an extent]. They attest to no knowledge of a higher power. You just going to ignore them and just go with the half a dozen that do?

:-s [radius, not diameter dude]

Incorrect. For all intensive purposes, you would be correct in saying it's essentially nothing, but it still holds value above zero no matter how infinitely small it is. Although, for this case, calling it essentially nothing works, because our minds can't grasp how meager our efforts are in comparison to all that has been done in the universe since the beginning of time. Meh, I prefer to think relative to stuff I understand and can grasp, i.e., not the entirety of existence : .

^Rounding down to zero and equalling zero are two very different things Kashi :-w .

Which, ironically, is the hardest one of the set. F***kin' fast notes. FINGERS DON'T MOVE THAT FAST, DAMNIT.

What a great use of time.

So you hold all animals on level ground with humans; you believe all animals should be treated exactly like our species? Good luck with that.

Zoid, doesn't your hair get annoying when it gets in your front of your eyes :P ? Last time I had hair that long (that simply fell in front of my eyes -_-", two years ago, never again), it was so frikkin' annoying to play soccer that I had to cut it short the instant it started limiting my vision #-o . I can't imagine you ever being blind in any less than one eye at a time with that cut...

What you call cowardice someone else might call realism- knowing that this is twenty years in a confined area with no human contact, twenty years of being absent from the real world- not just some silly chance to get some reading done even though the person never read before when they had the time. Some people know their limits, some are just idealistic about their's, and some just plain don't and don't admit to knowing them. Unlike the majority of members here, not everyone's an introvert people. Don't act like the better man, like this guy, just because you are one. Sorry, back to the fun, that post just irked me -_-".

I don't wear glasses, but most of the guys at my school who do only wear them occasionally (as most don't fully need them), and most actually look pretty good and sophisticated in them :lol: . So, can't really say I've got any experiences with glasses being detrimental to one's social status, neither of my own or of anyone else.

I believe he's inquiring about the odd correlation between intelligence and the wearing of glasses, one that occurs even though there's no biological reason for such a thing to happen. Correct?

Or, you know, the game just gets boring for some of us, and we just cluster into the OT.