Bauke

That'll be quite productive.

Yes, that could be considered lucky. Luck is when you get something where it isn't statistically expected. A whip after 1 abyssal kill is extremely luck. A whip after 10 kills is a little less lucky, but still lucky, and one after 450 kills is just what you'd expect. My point is, when you're talking about general gameplay, then you don't have more or less luck than anyone else. Individual experiences, like the one you described above can be about luck. If you haven't gotten a good drop in 7 years, then you haven't tried enough.

No. Don't try and play RS in school. Instead, pay attention in grammar and spelling classes, kay?

Another state one step further in civilization :thumbup:

9/10, it'll be 10/10 when you get there :P

I did 10km yesterday. It was my first try (usually do 5km, and 7.5km) so I took it slowly. Got me a time of 47.30. Not bad for a first try I'd say. Wasn't even tired afterwards. Just need to take a few minutes off that time, so I can beat my old man :D

Bank: 4/10. You're poor for the stats you have. I mean, you can do double nats. Stats: 8/10. I like your mining and rc. Decent allround stats as well. Although all skills 70+ would be even better.

That's quite a meaningless thing to say. You were simply wrong about the rings. There. Edit: Oh, and decent'ish bank.

Why can Jagex decide what browser I use to play Runescape in? They have nothing to do with what I have installed on my pc. SK doesn't breach any of their rules, it just shows the Runescape webpage, and has some features that are built around it. I don't use SK, but this is [bleep]ing [developmentally delayed]ed.

True, but over a certain period of time, that luck evens out. People that have gotten a lot of rare drops in years time probably tried much longer to get them as well.

Proof for what? How about you supply some proof hmm? You're the one claiming RSC was all that much better. I played it, and didn't see it.

Your poverty has nothing to do with the system. Drop Rate luck then. Smarty-Pants. -.- Drop rate is the same for everyone. It has nothing to do with luck. It's simply a matter of statistics.

Stats are decent, not all that great.. but your bank is really good. Definitely a nice amount of cash.

7/10 Not bad for your first two 99's.

Camping is not bad, it's just something that doesn't yield any respect. So when posting here, and it's obvious that you're a camper, you shouldn't be expecting a high rating. Otherwise, just be a happy camper, I'd say.

No pic, no proof. Ask anyone that played RSC after March 2004. Wrong.

I'd only do them because they yield extra money, and yes I'm banking them. I've calced it, and it seems that when I'm using an adze + pack yak, they give 56k xp an hour. Considering I can get almost 80k an hour with teaks, I'd say they're not worth it, after all.

And what the hell does that have to do with anything?

I pay for this game. Having my access restricted is not what I pay for. People need to take their own responsibility. Jagex does not need to parent their players.

Well, this was to be expected. I'm interested in the quest.

Jagex wants your money, not your hard work.

Low skills and common 99's. 4/10 To be honest, I'd keep the cooking cape. But that's my personal taste.

What about mahogany instead of teak? I've been doing a bit of mahogany for a short while, and noticed it's not that much slower than teaks, while they give aproximately 1.5 times the xp. I'm lvl 99 woodcutting though. Does anyone have numbers regarding this subject? Mahogany logs bring in more money, so if it's the same xp rate (or just mildly less) it'd be worth it to switch to mahogany.

Yet, there was a lot more scamming and macroing in RSC. And the incidence of spot stealing hasn't changed over the years.

I don't expect Jagex to keep teasing us for months about a particular quest. I expect the quest to be out very soon. Maybe tomorrow. But at least in a month time.