Bauke

^What he said. I'm not going to switch.

Not only does it take a lot more time, the game has only like 10% of the content and the graphics suck. Why would people want to play a game with a fragment of the content and bad graphics? Especially people that don't know the feel of RSC from the old days. I'd check it out, just to get that feeling again (not to play). But people who haven't played RSC won't have that feeling and won't like a single bit of it. And don't give me that crap that training on RS2 doesn't cost time. Else tell me why you haven't gotten all 99's yet. I prefer rsc graphics to rs2's slow moving graphics. You're one of the few then. Why not? Because you want only the elitist veterans to play the game? Right.. xp just magically appears in your sleep. Then why do you want to play RSC? No but RSC lacks graphics, content and technology. It's crippled on all sides.

I pray them. Food makes your stay a lot shorter.

I do them in the chaos tunnels with a combat familiar.

How much do you "lose" in an hour if you don't use the range bonus pray? Is it worth the pray pots?

Check if your fan is still working correctly. You might be able to notice that by measuring temperatures. Or just look into your case to check if it's still blowing properly. Also, scan the disk on errors. There are numerous tools available if you do a quick Google search. Might be bad blocks on the drive.

Actually, one could say that religion was the first stab at actually understanding the world around us; It's only fantasy because a lot of questions posed 2,000+ years ago were answered. How did we get here? We were created this way. Why do we suffer? Our creator is punishing us for something. What happens when I die? You go to live with your creator if you're good. Why are we 'intelligent' when animals are not? Because God made us after Him. Even now, religion is there to answer the unanswered... The flaws existing because we're greedy when we have power. "Give me that thing." "No." "But God says you have to. " I want my answers based on something that was not made up by man and I want it backed up by proof. So no religion for me. If it wasn't for science, the world would still be flat. And that's the last thing I'm going to say about it, damnit. I want to hear stuff about the fossil, no religious muttering that I've heard over and over.

Wow, that's definitely a good list of suggestions. Though, I'm not particularly fond of suggestion #1. But the rest... yes please.

It has to be greaters, no lessers. And I don't know where you can cannon them.

By that logic, no skill would ever get another 90+ addition. Slayer needs another 90+ to provide contuinity in training the skill and give a purpose after lvl 90. Other skills are a different story. Perhaps they deserve an addition as well, perhaps they don't. In either case slayer needs an addition past lvl 90.

Nice 2000 total, 7/10.

I totally agree with Green Day. Who in his right mind filters content from cd's? If you don't want to hear it, don't buy the album. I hate all forms of censoring with a passion. Luckily such policies barely exist in my country.

Science does not seek to disprove religion, because religion is based on fantasy and can thus not be scientifically disproven. There needs to be at least something that can be tried to disprove. Instead science just focuses on improving the knowledge of the things that happen around us, based on actual evidence and empirical findings.

Yes.

Woops, that was a typo.

I'd advice against prayer. That is, if you can use a pony. I've been doing fine at 99 def and void, with the use of a pony.

Votes only make an actual difference if your vote could balance the outcome from one side to the other. Usually that's not the case. Certainly not with the elections. Though, voting is good, because if everyone just dropped their vote because it wouldn't make a difference, then you don't have an accurate representation of what the people want. And that is important. Funny example though. We've had for the city council. And I decided not to vote. After the elections I heard that "my" party needed one more vote for an extra seat in the city council :D Well, that's just a small community, so that's why this could've happened. Though it was quite funny.

Yes, but it isn't naturally occuring. It does, although not quite often, and mostly in a pathological way. Though, in the past, these mechanisms have helped to build up our DNA strands. It doesn't destroy the cell, nor is it artificial. Yes it is, in the lab, but we use the same mechanisms found in nature. But it has not occured and it is pretty much impossible that it will happen. Today, a virus is a pathological particle. But in the early stages of life, it could have been the source of our primary building blocks, a virus-like particle able to accumulate DNA, and mutate, and thus promote diversion. I think the antibiotics resistance of bacteria is a perfect example of how information can be gained. It can just happen in all ways possible. Selection pressure, changeable DNA, and you see that over time new genes are added to the genome, built out of the same strand of DNA, but with different nucleotides, and thus a different subset of information. It's not that hard to imagine either. Lets say we have a bit of junk DNA. We induce a few mutations, so that a TATA sequence arises. A TATA sequence is usually a promotor region, so transcription factors can bind. Add a few more proteins and mutations over time, and RNA polymerase II is able to bind, and transcribe the DNA. A few more mutations downstream the bit of DNA, and we have a stop codon. Since DNA is changeable, it can all happen. Highly unlikely the way I described it, but in the course of evolution information has been added continuously. No. I have no idea how you've came up with this, but this is just totally wrong. DNA is very changeable. We have 6 billion nucleotides, and only a part of them provide information. It is no more than logic that Wrong. Basic biological principles point in the other direction. And gain of function is something EVERY biologist works with. This is established knowledge in the field of genetics.

Religion should just stay out of a topic that discusses an evolutionary phenomenon. Religions should just [bleep] off and die in general, but hey, everyone's entitled to their own beliefs, even if they're [developmentally delayed]ed.

You basically would have to play full time. Or just know how to play efficiently. I can get the xp to 80 in two weeks, and I don't even have to try that hard. Sure, I have my skills maxed, but it shouldn't take ages for those who have lower levels. That is, if you want to play efficiently. If you look at that guy's total stats, you do not get there in one year merely by "playing efficiently." You would have to play A LOT AND efficiently. I was talking about slayer in specific, not about his stats. In fact, I didn't even look at them.

Yeah, that's what Fx does as well. Well, I guess it ain't that bad.

Yes, mutations can cause a gain of function. That is undisputably true, Actual extra information, in terms of nucleotides can be achieved by incorporating extra DNA into the genome. There are various ways to take up extra DNA, which I've expressed in my post. Nope, like I said nucleotides can be added, and changes can be altered. The molecular mechanisms underlying these processes can be used in the lab to create and customize our bacteria. Viruses can incorporate themselves in our genome, using our molecular machineries that are present in the cell. It's a flaw in your understanding of evolution. A fish can't indeed turn into a man. That's not the point evolution is trying to make. The point is that a fish and a man, somewhere in evolution have had a common ancestor. After that point, the fish and the man took their own ways in the development of their genomes (influenced by point mutation, homologeous recombination, translocations, deletions, incorporation of new DNA (with the aid of viruses and bacteria), etc, etc. And you'd be surprised to know how much we have in common with the fish. Our embryo's look the same, for example. And all the other things I've stated before in my post. I don't see how. It's just that your argument is flawed. New information can be gained, and is gained all of the time. That is indisputably true. There are gazillions of examples available, and the resistance of bacteria against antibiotics is one of them. Then how are they related? Abiogenesis speaks of the creation of life from "dead" material, while evolution speaks about the development of one species to another one. Excuse me? Have you actually read my post? You're coming up with factual wrong arguments and you accuse me of vagueness and irrelevant information? And how is my grammar bad, or sub par compared to the rest of the forums? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahah There really is middle ground you guys. We have a lot of laughs. Glad you like my post, though it saddens me that this is the most intelligent you can come up with.

Not only does it take a lot more time, the game has only like 10% of the content and the graphics suck. Why would people want to play a game with a fragment of the content and bad graphics? Especially people that don't know the feel of RSC from the old days. I'd check it out, just to get that feeling again (not to play). But people who haven't played RSC won't have that feeling and won't like a single bit of it. And don't give me that crap that training on RS2 doesn't cost time. Else tell me why you haven't gotten all 99's yet.

I totally agree that low levelled miners win too much over the high levelled miners. I've experienced that myself, and I've noticed that it's pretty much useless to have a high mining level in terms of speed. There really should be a greater difference. I mean, you have a higher level for a reason.

You basically would have to play full time. Or just know how to play efficiently. I can get the xp to 80 in two weeks, and I don't even have to try that hard. Sure, I have my skills maxed, but it shouldn't take ages for those who have lower levels. That is, if you want to play efficiently.