That is your opinion, not everyone shares it. Just because you view one band as good and another as as just being a fun listen, dosent mean others cant view other bands the same way. That is a close minded statment.... ...And how it is a closeminded statement? As far as I can see, what Quer Skull said is perfectly true. It IS true to say that 'bad' music, let's say, poor-quality recording and a squeaky violin noise, may be enjoyable to listen to. If anyone here is being closeminded, it's you, Lionheart. Yes, but what defines music as "good" is mostly subjective. Where do you draw the line between good and all else? Does the word "good" mean it has a good beat, or genius themes and canons, or moving lyrics, or difficult guitar solos, or makes you want to dance? These are all valid qualifications someone might have for defining "good" music. There is no objectively "good' music because good is a definitively subjective word. Yes, that's what I mean. Quer Skull is referring to music as 'good' because it makes him feel like the music does, or he particularly enjoys it. Lionheart is referring to it as, say, top quality recording and a pretty, in-tune voice.