May 7, 200719 yr quoting an accepted word i used and then replying with an unaccepted adjective... pointless come up with better insults for me in future i may then take notice :
May 7, 200719 yr quoting an accepted word i used and then replying with an unaccepted adjective... pointless come up with better insults for me in future i may then take notice : I don't think you used the word "crap," I was just giving a short summary of your post. Also, I wasn't try to insult you as much as point out my feelings on the subject.
May 7, 200719 yr Well i should've used the word crap to sum up Nadril's post Well then carry on your venting of thoughts and if you do it again about me in future, please put effort in :|
May 7, 200719 yr Stuff he didn't say but thinks he might have so he might get mad about but I'm putting this here anyways.. I agree with indy, you are kind of annoying.. Internet Marketing For Newbies
May 7, 200719 yr \there would have to be more than the three dimensions we can perceive at work. That's a big word in my dictionary, as it was humans ourselves that created the concept/thory/law of dimensions, so why shouldn't there be more to the three that we have created based on what we alone know? There are four easily measured dimensions. Height, width, depth, time. Yes, time is a dimension. @bbalking, You don't go to university. K. You barely know what you're talking about. Yes, we know you can't see a black hole - even if they had no gravitational mass at all, you wouldn't be able to see them. The thing about a black hole is that it's as small as an object can possibly be - or even smaller. However, you could easily observe a black hole without being close enough to be pulled in. We can observe black holes from earth. Even through the naked eye, we could observe them safely. Looking directly at one from a good distance, you'd see something very similar to the original picture.
May 7, 200719 yr \there would have to be more than the three dimensions we can perceive at work. That's a big word in my dictionary, as it was humans ourselves that created the concept/thory/law of dimensions, so why shouldn't there be more to the three that we have created based on what we alone know? There are four easily measured dimensions. Height, width, depth, time. Yes, time is a dimension. @bbalking, You don't go to university. K. You barely know what you're talking about. Yes, we know you can't see a black hole - even if they had no gravitational mass at all, you wouldn't be able to see them. The thing about a black hole is that it's as small as an object can possibly be - or even smaller. However, you could easily observe a black hole without being close enough to be pulled in. We can observe black holes from earth. Even through the naked eye, we could observe them safely. Looking directly at one from a good distance, you'd see something very similar to the original picture. Wrong, you cannot observe a black hole, you can only see its affects. Don't question me about what i've learnt mm'kay. There has never been a sighting of a blackhole only possible affects no big round black swirly circle has ever and will ever be viewed. :-$
May 7, 200719 yr K. Observing something is not the same as seeing it with your eyes. I can observe the wind. I can't see it. I see its effects. That is what observation is. That being said, it is very likely that at some point in humanity's future we will observe a black hole via telescope, or even up close. And I'm damn well going to question what you've "learnt" if you're going to say stupid things.
May 8, 200719 yr Black holes do exist however u cannot see them! Every picture that is made is an interpretation of what they are like. The shere size of them and gravitational force means that getting anyway near to view them would mean being sucked in. Sorry to say it but it actually true, Physics at uni all the way 8-) Thank you for saying what the people on the first page said.. and the second... and well, the third and forth as well. However you have big text so that must mean you are important in which case I will let it slide. Thanks for letting it "slide" i was so worried that u would not let it go! And sorry for choosing not to read the usual drivel people write and saying straight what i think? Hope u let this "slide" I'm not sure if I can let this one slide. You see, I don't think the text size is quite large enough to get the point across. It should be something more like... This To be truely effective. This topic seems to have veered off into a black hole. Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
May 8, 200719 yr Bballking, stop trying to disprove people who are > you and obviously know the meanings of words that we learned when we were 10. Was that big enough to get the point across? I <3 obnoxiousness :thumbsup: Now to contribute to the topic, so I don't get banned: I remember reading that black holes just decompose anything that enters them into nuclear particles and spreads these newly-acquired particles around. Anyone know more on this? Mugutu
May 8, 200719 yr Wrong, you cannot observe a black hole, you can only see its affects. Don't question me about what i've learnt mm'kay. There has never been a sighting of a blackhole only possible affects no big round black swirly circle has ever and will ever be viewed. :-$ Has it not occurred to you that maybe our telescopes just aren't powerful enough? "Da mihi castitatem et continentam, sed noli modo"
May 8, 200719 yr scientists can observe black holes by the effescts on stars around them for example, if there is a star orbiting an invisible object(assuming its a black hole)the orbit would be incredibley fast and most of the time it is a small brown dwarf star. also, most scientists believe there is a MASSIVE black hole at the centre of most galaxy's. ON-Topic, that black hole looks so photoshopped its hard to believe someone could think thats real. but at least it is the closest yet : 360 GT: hotdogstandyeah
May 8, 200719 yr Black holes will always be above and beyong my understanding and I don't see why people on this thread are trying to explain things that even top researchers cant. I fail to see how its possible to take a picture of something that is basicly the absense of light. Mercifull <3 Suzi "We don't want players to be able to buy their way to success in RuneScape. If we let players start doing this, it devalues RuneScape for others. We feel your status in real-life shouldn't affect your ability to be successful in RuneScape" Jagex 01/04/01 - 02/03/12
May 9, 200719 yr Wrong, you cannot observe a black hole, you can only see its affects. Don't question me about what i've learnt mm'kay. There has never been a sighting of a blackhole only possible affects no big round black swirly circle has ever and will ever be viewed. :-$ Has it not occurred to you that maybe our telescopes just aren't powerful enough? Read my other posts on this topic before accusing me of something I've already said. Mm'kay?
May 9, 200719 yr Wrong, you cannot observe a black hole, you can only see its affects. Don't question me about what i've learnt mm'kay. There has never been a sighting of a blackhole only possible affects no big round black swirly circle has ever and will ever be viewed. :-$ Has it not occurred to you that maybe our telescopes just aren't powerful enough? Read my other posts on this topic before accusing me of something I've already said. Mm'kay? No, not mm'kay. I've read your other posts (they're hard to miss) and I still don't think it's occurred to you that if you were close enough to a black hole it could be possible to observe the event horizon (not the singularity). But of course, you've done physics at uni so you must be right, sorry for questioning you. "Da mihi castitatem et continentam, sed noli modo"
May 9, 200719 yr i balck hole absorbs light, so if we lit up the whole universe (yes i know its impossible) would we be able to see them then?
May 9, 200719 yr i balck hole absorbs light, so if we lit up the whole universe (yes i know its impossible) would we be able to see them then? What the hell is that. With so many trees in the city you could see the spring coming each day until a night of warm wind would bring it suddenly in one morning. Sometimes the heavy cold rains would beat it back so that it would seem that it would never come and that you were losing a season out of your life. But you knew that there would always be the spring as you knew the river would flow again after it was frozen. When the cold rains kept on and killed the spring, it was as though a young person had died for no reason. In those days though the spring always came finally but it was frightening that it had nearly failed.
May 9, 200719 yr i balck hole absorbs light, so if we lit up the whole universe (yes i know its impossible) would we be able to see them then? I'll get right on to phoning god about turning the lightswitch 'on' from 'off'.
May 9, 200719 yr i balck hole absorbs light, so if we lit up the whole universe (yes i know its impossible) would we be able to see them then? I'll get right on to phoning god about turning the lightswitch 'on' from 'off'. LOL.
May 9, 200719 yr i balck hole absorbs light, so if we lit up the whole universe (yes i know its impossible) would we be able to see them then? I'll get right on to phoning god about turning the lightswitch 'on' from 'off'. Let me know when this will take place. I want to make sure to close my eyes, things might get pretty bright.
May 9, 200719 yr Wrong, you cannot observe a black hole, you can only see its affects. Don't question me about what i've learnt mm'kay. There has never been a sighting of a blackhole only possible affects no big round black swirly circle has ever and will ever be viewed. :-$ Has it not occurred to you that maybe our telescopes just aren't powerful enough? Read my other posts on this topic before accusing me of something I've already said. Mm'kay? bbalking, I've read all the posts on this thread, so allow me to say: Has it not occurred to you that maybe our telescopes just aren't powerful enough?
May 9, 200719 yr i balck hole absorbs light, so if we lit up the whole universe (yes i know its impossible) would we be able to see them then? um 20 old men in one place? Sounds like an internet chat room! :D ...Anyone? Anyone?
May 9, 200719 yr You cannot see a black hole, scientists just see the universe getting sucked into somewhere and call it a black hole. You can't see a real one. Ponies!
May 10, 200719 yr Dude. Read the whole freaking thread before you make stupid posts like this. To recap: 1. You can see black holes, for a given value of see 2. This value is, "you notice a large patch of absolute nothingness". 3. You can, however, observe them. 4. bbalking has apperantly taking "a course at uni", and is therefore the master of black holes. 5. Therefore, he is entitled to claim seeing = observing, thus we cannot see black holes. 6. Read the whole thread or go aways.
Create an account or sign in to comment