July 9, 200718 yr At level 65, you shouldn't be training on 92's in the first place... Most level 50-70 members train on a level 13 monster... (Rock Crabs) But if you insist on attacking higher-leveled monsters, here are your choices 50+ I completely disagree with your idea because of the reasoning you put behind it. ~ Clicky for the blog of No Cb Skils ~
July 9, 200718 yr Would be nice if they threw a couple of greaters among the lessers in volcano on Karamja. [spoiler=Stats:]Updated December 22, 2011: Total level - 1442 - 170M+ XP , Combat level - 115Combat skills: Attack - 90, Defence - 99 (24.45m+ XP), Strength - 90, Constitution - 99 (16.42M+ XP) Ranged - 99 (13.32M+ XP), Prayer - 60, Magic - 99 (13.25M+ XP)Non-Combat skills: Cooking - 99 (13.80M+ XP), Woodcutting - 99 (31.95M+ XP), Fishing - 90, Firemaking - 99 (24.82M+), Crafting - 90, Smithing - 90, Mining - 85, Runecrafting - 60, Dungeoneering - 85
July 9, 200718 yr a comat lv 65 training on lv 100+ monsters... i see something wrong with that picture. If you want to level up, train on something better suited to your level. If your lv 65, or want to get to 65, train on guards or skeletons. they have good hp, and if you dont care about drops, as you say nothing about monster drops, then you could train here until 70+. And take this into consideration. Im cb lv 98, and up until cb 90, the only high lv creatures i had ever fought were the monsters i had fought were the boss monsters in Desert Treasure, and some other high level quest monsters. never once did i train on lv 100+. There are plenty of good hp monsters in f2p. Hill giants Moss giants, skeletons, guards, al kahrid warriors, scorpions. and many of those are usually empty, other than mossies and hills. Personally, i don't see any reason to add any creatures to f2p. 99 Fletching 99 Attack 99 Constitution 99 Cooking 99 StrengthGamertag: H8tebringer
July 9, 200718 yr There's massive potential for a good argument here. But, sadly, yours is lackluster, to be kind. I'm f2p myself, if you must know. And, to reiterate another's point, you shouldn't be training on lessers in the first place! go for ice warriors or something like that, if you need money and exp. Lessers should be only trained on by the higher ups (85+) if you don't want to burn food. You never know which rabbit hole you jump into will lead to Wonderland. - Ember3579Aku Soku Zan. - ShinsengumiYou wanna mess with me or my friends? Pick your poison.If you have any complaints about me, please refer to this link. Your problems are important to me.Don't talk smack if you're not willing to say it to the person's face. On the same line, if you're not willing to back up your opinions no matter what, your opinion may as well be nonexistent.
July 9, 200718 yr First of all, you said you want a monster to train on. There are quite alot of monsters to train on. For some reason everyone thinks that training on a high-level moster is better than a low-levelled one. That is quite wrong, ignoring drops. The only reason a high-levelled monster would be wanted is for a challenge or the drops. If you ask me, you can go pking if you want either of those. That means that xp is what everryone should be after. Probably the best way Jagex can give F2P and P2P another way to gain xp is that you gain xp for attacking other players. There's no such thing as regret. A regret means you are unhappy with the person you are now,and if you're unhappy with the person you are, you change yourself. Thatregret will no longer be a regret, because it will help to form the new,better you. So really, a regret isn't a regret. It's experience.
July 9, 200718 yr I had 80 combat before I got members :lol:, nothing to train on? You just want more variety, and thats what P2p is for. Jagex can't give f2p too much variety of monsters otherwise nothing would intice (sp?) them to finally make the switch to p2p. Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Oscar Wilde
July 10, 200718 yr i agree that there should be more stronger monsters to kill... lol and maybe some better drops :D
July 10, 200718 yr I don't see the need for higher lvl'ed monsters, I'm f2p, 82 combat, and I ought it good enough to train on hobgoblins and ice warriors. Achieved quest (07/08/2009), woodcutting (28/06/2010), attack (21/07/2010), strength + constitution (07/08/2010), defence (26/09/2010), summoning (13/01/2011), herblore (03/03/2011), cook (31/08/2012), firemaking (01/09/2012), magic (08/09/2012), prayer (16/09/2012) and ranged (29/10/2012) capes.
July 10, 200718 yr I agree. Even though some of the lower leveled monsters give better experience. Although, it would be great to have better drops. Like a Rune Platebody or something.
July 10, 200718 yr Jagex wants you to be P2P. Therefore, they put things in P2P that you want. WHEN will people understand? :roll: No, I really don't play anymore.
July 11, 200718 yr I agree Lessers should be only trained on by the higher ups (85+) if you don't want to burn food. hello i'm combat 62 and i train on lessers We definatly need more high levle monsters f2p for lifeI apologize for my terrible spelling
July 11, 200718 yr I agree Lessers should be only trained on by the higher ups (85+) if you don't want to burn food. hello i'm combat 62 and i train on lessers We definatly need more high levle monsters Congratulations, you can train on lessers, a remarkabl achievement for you. You have also increased a stupidity and food-burning level. I definatly think you should be training on lower levle monsters. But tbh, you should actually take a second to comprehend what the content of the post means before you attempt to argue. And more high level f2p monsters? Why not just give them magic trees, fishing sharks, castle wars, duel arena, whips, and everything else while we are at it? A wise saying "You get what you pay for." Guide to Making a Foolproof RuneScape Password
Create an account or sign in to comment