August 2, 200718 yr Owned. I really wouldn't call it an era. It was more of a definitive time period during which dinstinctive characteristics were expressed in similar ways.
August 3, 200718 yr Author Meh, should have banned him from touching himself. Would have solved the problem there and then! This is how much you all raised for charity. Thank you.
August 3, 200718 yr :shock: :shock: All I can say is HAHAHAHAHAHA! How can you actually give a punishment like that? I think its hilarious lol and totally impractical. There is NO WAY they can enforce a punishment like that. It's not like a cop on the side of the road is going to see him talking to a woman and go interrogate him for talking to her :-s . This is so stupid yet so funny :lol: .
August 3, 200718 yr i think it's more of, if he gets another complaint against him, then he goes to jail, type of punishment Worth saying again. It's more likely to be an insurance that should he do something like this ever again, there'll be an additional charge to add to his name, allowing the judical system to punish him more harshly. Enforcing it as such isn't really the objective. -This message was deviously brought to you by:
August 3, 200718 yr Off-Topic though, does anyone know how that law suit by the judge against the dry cleaning company is coming along?I remember reading abit ago that the dry cleaners won. I was gonna post it on the thread that someone had made about it on here but i couldn't find it.
August 3, 200718 yr Author Even the man's picture in the news arcticle strikes me as: "D'oh, silly boy done wrong!" This is how much you all raised for charity. Thank you.
August 4, 200718 yr Hes 23 he grabbed between legs of 44 year old womens butt :shock: :-s :? bad dreams sucks for him lol
August 20, 200718 yr Man, that IS pretty funny. This has made my day! To think I found such a classy thread just looking for some of bubsa's music! I guess it is a bit of a stupid punishment, but it might actually work, I mean I'm not saying what he did was ok, but how serious was it really? Better than wasting a cell with him for a few months. I just hope they took away his bike.
August 20, 200718 yr If they really thought he was a danger he'd be in prison. I suppose this could be so if any whiff of an "assault" on a woman is heard of they can throw him in prison. Having said this i have no idea how the police are meant to stop him all the time, its not practical but its a sort of "dont try it again or we'll have you in prison for a long time".
August 20, 200718 yr Haha, oh man I can just picture the judges face when he read the papers for that case... But how will they enforce that kind of order? It's ridiculous, they should just make him wear a t-shirt that says "Prone to fondling" when around women. "Da mihi castitatem et continentam, sed noli modo"
August 20, 200718 yr You have to admit those jogging bottoms need grabbing 8-) :XD: In all honesty he got what he deserved A friend to all is a friend to none.
August 20, 200718 yr But how will they enforce that kind of order? It's ridiculous, they should just make him wear a t-shirt that says "Prone to fondling" when around women. What, and that's supposed to make him stand out as a more credible threat than other males? Varrock Library: Shattered Sky | Silent Thunder | The Emperor's FinestAstri @ MythWeavers
August 20, 200718 yr I think it was a bit of a harsh sentance for what he did, but come on, that stuff was just wrong, doing it to women he didnt even know :?
August 21, 200718 yr Wat happens if he's in a shop and there are only women serving, would he have to communicte by sign language? He deserved to be punsished, but this is an irrational punishment and just not sensible.
August 21, 200718 yr He should appeal his ban... Like I did HAHAHAHA :lol: :: Guess the Movie Contest Champion: pfilc23 ::
August 21, 200718 yr Author Haha :P I thought you'd recently popped back. This is how much you all raised for charity. Thank you.
August 21, 200718 yr BBC Source Now, it's right he was punished for what he did, it was totally unacceptable. But does anyone else see the punishment as impractical, archaic and, in all honesty, very, very funny? Don't talk to me, have you forgot what happened 2 years ago? :shame: Breaking your probation already! :XD: ~Defender~ If you love me, send me a PM. 8 - Love me2 - Hate me
August 21, 200718 yr What i see happening. Woman: excuse me sir, do you have the time? Man: *flails hands* Woman: Sir.. all i want is the time :-s Man: CANT TALK CANT TALK BAD BAD BLAUH *runs away* XD Lulz0r ftw.
August 21, 200718 yr I think he should just go to prison for about 2 years. Off topic: Those butts are almost irresistable. :XD: :XD: :XD: Just kiddin or am i? :-$
August 21, 200718 yr That's rediculous..probably the worst punishment ever, if you're gonna hand out a punishment at least choose it yourself rather than letting your 8 year old son choose it...who ever thought it up is a complete idiot. And as for some of the stuff some people have said, jail for 2 years? for squeezing someone. Sorry but law enforcement is getting stupid, people get community service for stealing, yet this guy cant talk to women for 5 years..for squeezing some women...what the hell. Sig by me....
August 21, 200718 yr If he was given the sentance for TOUCHING women, then how come he cant SPEAK to them?
August 21, 200718 yr Haha, oh man I can just picture the judges face when he read the papers for that case... But how will they enforce that kind of order? It's ridiculous, they should just make him wear a t-shirt that says "Prone to fondling" when around women. People these days wear shirts with texts like "serial killer" so nobody would take it as more than a joke :lol:
Create an account or sign in to comment