August 18, 200718 yr Total xp for total level shows more then combat level. Nice pic though, i suppose i'm more of a total xp person with lvls from 50-99 Doomy edit: I like sheep
August 18, 200718 yr level all your skills together.. and maybe you can have a gigantic party where you get all 23 99s at the same time. remb to invite me. =)
August 18, 200718 yr I used to be a major skiller, rather than combat so my total exp was relatively low, I would be the lowest for every total level. I gave up and didnt care for it much anymore and decided to have fun where I felt needed without worrying about my exp. A reflection is just a distorted reality held by glass and your mind.
August 18, 200718 yr I am currently 1260 total and 97m+ exp. I do level skills past 99 also. [spoiler=Stats:]Updated December 22, 2011: Total level - 1442 - 170M+ XP , Combat level - 115Combat skills: Attack - 90, Defence - 99 (24.45m+ XP), Strength - 90, Constitution - 99 (16.42M+ XP) Ranged - 99 (13.32M+ XP), Prayer - 60, Magic - 99 (13.25M+ XP)Non-Combat skills: Cooking - 99 (13.80M+ XP), Woodcutting - 99 (31.95M+ XP), Fishing - 90, Firemaking - 99 (24.82M+), Crafting - 90, Smithing - 90, Mining - 85, Runecrafting - 60, Dungeoneering - 85
August 18, 200718 yr Well, I guess my total xp is kinda high for my total level, because of my woodcutting and fletching. I like high total xp, but total level is what really matters in the highscores. Yes, I'm greedy of xp. 6,521th to 99 woodcutting | Fletching 98/99 | Idarodo | Combat 90 | Total 1565+ | 38m+ total exp Retired.
August 18, 200718 yr I think total level is more important. It shows that you have done all aspects of the game, and not just grind the easy skills to 200mil xp.
August 18, 200718 yr i just did my total exp devided by 23 skills and i got 5.6mill exp meaning i should have 90 skill average meaning i got very low total exp and tbh i couldn't care less if i wanted it higher i would just get 200m cook exp 180th to 99 Divination + 1st W36er Rambo, cannot pk call your friends bro :). Wait nevermind none of SAPK/PKS can. Kappa.
August 18, 200718 yr total skill (number) isn't an accurate depiction of effort put into the game. The actual xp amount shines light on the subject like nothing else can. So by your theory someone with 2 99's maxed to 200 mil exp would be considered a better player than me someone with 18 99's and just over 320 mil exp :roll: lover romeo can pull that off, it depends on what the skills are. if you max out cooking and fletching 200m xp its no harder than getting 1500 total. i can see what your saying if you mean that finishing all the 99s means you are capable of going beyond the skills anyway, but if you have the patience to do 200m mining and agility xp before any other skill im pretty sure its not hard to get 13m xp in everything else. 4000000657th to 99 cookin555555406th to 99 flethcin
August 18, 200718 yr I like to see myself with a high total xp compared to my combat lvl, i just see my xp as the amount of effort put into the game. I have 1232 total lvl with 10.7m xp, but i have 3 farming and i havent even started construction or hunter, so i could easily add another 150 at least to my skill total but i normally train the skills i enjoy. P2P offers more and better ways of making money than f2p. That's one of the cons you just have to play with if you don't feel like having 1 bigmac meal less per month.
August 18, 200718 yr I like my total zp more than total level. I like total level more than combat level. XP shows you can powertrain a skill which is what i do most of the time. I shall take my flock underneath my own wing, and kick them right the [bleep] out of the tree. If they were meant to fly, they won't break their necks on the concrete.So, what is 1.111... equal to?10/9. Please don't continue.
August 18, 200718 yr Total exp is the best way to compare which players is better... like the word says, exp is compared between the 2 players, the one with the highest prob worked harder then the one with lower but higher total level. Most of the time i just ask everyone their total levels, but then they always say something higher then me since i have skills that arn't even ranked yet, but when i ask for their total level, they have barely half the total exp i have. which means that if i used the time and put those exp in the skill of my lacking, my total level would probably be way higher then his... It shouldn't be total level that you should judge, but the total exp. I would rather value a level 3 with 200mil exp then a level 3 with 1400 total level but only 40 mil exp Right...
Create an account or sign in to comment