Ts_Stormrage Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Summoning... everyone tlks about it everyone makes their own threads... How do I think the skill will work? I know there is a TV show where 2 people toss out creatures against one another and have them fight eachother... POKEMON, I CHOOSE YOU!!! Think of it... Summoning pouches (pokeballs), limited time that your critter can be out, names that are hybrids of real animals (wolpertinger is part wolf, just look at the pics)... I'm willing to take bets on this :) Former Leader of The Tal Shiar Alliance - An Original Tip.it ClanMember of the Wilderness Guardians and Founder of the Silent GuardiansFounder of The Conclave - A Tip.it Clan institutionTip.it Times author (click for all my articles) - When I use the wrong reasons to make the right statement, argue the reason, not the statement.MSSW4 General - Did we kick your ass too?Check us out!==> No seriously, if you like FREE GP, XP and Dung tokens, as well as Community, Opportunity and above all FUN... <==CLICK IT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phata_elise Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 So you think that creatures need to be captured first and can then be used constantly without the use of some resources? Seems unlikely, don't you think? ;) So if that is not it, then what reminds you of pokemon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FooK-A-Ji Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 No you're wrong. They are familiars, familiars have existed in many rpg's for years, fighting ALONGSIDE the player. Not duking it out in an arena like som mongoloid beyblade or pokemon :lol: p.s.. SQUIRTLE SQUIRTLE SQUIRTLE!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omega_Pure1 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 No you're wrong. They are familiars, familiars have existed in many rpg's for years, fighting ALONGSIDE the player. Not duking it out in an arena like som mongoloid beyblade or pokemon :lol: p.s.. SQUIRTLE SQUIRTLE SQUIRTLE!!! ^^ What he said \ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mugged99 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 sounds fun, but aren't the animals supposed to aid to, and not be the main fighter? Help Tip.it create a new RANGED MAX HIT CALCULATOR ~ crossbows, darts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omali Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 so we will be summoining monsters with pouches? I personally can't wait for the rants forum to be filled with "OMG Jadex mak gam 4 kidz, summing mite as well call dem poke-pouches, cuz der just lik pokemon!" When I said that, I didn't actually think anyone would be that pathetic. Also: Wolpertinger is a real mythical creature, not a pokemon. I didn't realize that pokemon (Yes, I played red and blue when they first came out) could only be out for a certain amount of time, and needed to be trained with the summoning skill. When we have to get badges in Summoning by defeating "obleisk gym bosses" and are given a "Summon-dex" to record information on our summon-mon, then I'll believe you. Otherwise, /thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert_de_Sable Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 You want MY opinion? No. [English translation needed] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calum12 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 My idea of how summoning will work is that certain items must be used to summon the animal (eggs, karamthulhu, etc.) Each sumons will use an amount of summoning points, more for a higher animal, and these points can be recharged at the obelisks we know about? What do you think? maybe the pouches can be obtained from some minigame or something and each one contains the items needed for that monster? Hmmm.... I need a new siggy, get round to doing it later. Probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yaz Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Also: Wolpertinger is a real mythical creature Erm? :? But I'm pretty sure pokemon wasn't the first game to use pets to fight and I do feel that the main diference will be animals attacking people, not animals attacking animals. On the other hand... [hide][/hide] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omali Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Also: Wolpertinger is a real mythical creature Erm? :? But I'm pretty sure pokemon wasn't the first game to use pets to fight and I do feel that the main diference will be animals attacking people, not animals attacking animals. On the other hand... [hide][/hide] In World Of Warcraft, a jackalope-like creature called a "Wolpertinger", which resembles a jackalope with buzzard wings, is given away as a non-combat pet (companion) at a yearly in-game festival called Brewfest. And as for the picture, I'd choose that game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mystic7 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 You want MY opinion? No. Your avvy is perfect for this thread. :lol: Long live freedom, equality, creativity, and long live the music.CC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest xpoc454 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Something is just not logical when hearing the sentance. "Wolpertinger is a real mythical creature, not a pokemon." :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yaz Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Also: Wolpertinger is a real mythical creature Erm? :? But I'm pretty sure pokemon wasn't the first game to use pets to fight and I do feel that the main diference will be animals attacking people, not animals attacking animals. On the other hand... [hide][/hide] In World Of Warcraft, a jackalope-like creature called a "Wolpertinger", which resembles a jackalope with buzzard wings, is given away as a non-combat pet (companion) at a yearly in-game festival called Brewfest. And as for the picture, I'd choose that game. My point is that there's no such thing as a real mythical creature, some jackalope with wings is just as "real" as a charmander. Neither exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omali Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Also: Wolpertinger is a real mythical creature Erm? :? But I'm pretty sure pokemon wasn't the first game to use pets to fight and I do feel that the main diference will be animals attacking people, not animals attacking animals. On the other hand... [hide][/hide] In World Of Warcraft, a jackalope-like creature called a "Wolpertinger", which resembles a jackalope with buzzard wings, is given away as a non-combat pet (companion) at a yearly in-game festival called Brewfest. And as for the picture, I'd choose that game. My point is that there's no such thing as a real mythical creature, some jackalope with wings is just as "real" as a charmander. Neither exist. Sure there is. Grendel is a real mythical creature, although he didn't exist. Pokemon are real fictional monsters, the wolpertinger is a derivative of a real mythical creature, a germanic version of the Jackalope, IE: The Wolpertinger is not just a Jagex attempt at a pokemon-esque ripoff, but has real roots in an already existing fictional creature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FooK-A-Ji Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Omali, please stop using the word "real", when addressing thinks "not real". You'll end up confusing yourself ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palas1 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Summoning pouches = pokeballs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phata_elise Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Omali, please stop using the word "real", when addressing thinks "not real". You'll end up confusing yourself ;) you do realize that in philosophy the terms 'real' and 'not real' are very flexible definitions? ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phata_elise Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Summoning pouches = pokeballs. why? explain. your answer is too short, please elaborate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FooK-A-Ji Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Omali, please stop using the word "real", when addressing thinks "not real". You'll end up confusing yourself ;) you do realize that in philosophy the terms 'real' and 'not real' are very flexible definitions? ;) Yes, I do realize that. But we're hardly philosophizing. And in reality, the terms "real" and "not real" are very clearly defined ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nenga Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 so in your opion runescape is gonna be the next pokemon game...i highly doubt it. Ponies! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallettheif Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Your most likely gonna have a familiar as a hitman than as a pet. The game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeyboo2 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Your most likely gonna have a familiar as a hitman than as a pet. well since they released photos of obvious pets like dogs, monkeys etc of course your going to have pets! :-s Ok, yes they have fighting monsters aswell but not 'hitmen', they don't run round assasinating people for money. Just fighters, not hitmen. Anyway their not gona be pokemon either...you'll just use life runes to summon then and then tell em to fight, or to collect resources/aid skill or tell em to follow you (pet). Simple as. : Yeah...Some people just go out of their way to ruin other peoples fun.Sounds like Jagex to me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkan420 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 no life runes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Str4lif3 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 3k That it's not like pokemon. But like yu-gi-oh :o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravenkana Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 No you're wrong. They are familiars, familiars have existed in many rpg's for years, fighting ALONGSIDE the player. Not duking it out in an arena like som mongoloid beyblade or pokemon :lol: p.s.. SQUIRTLE SQUIRTLE SQUIRTLE!!!Hmm.... I agree with that. P.S. Bulba SAUR! If the CORPORAL beast is this hard, imagine how hard a GENERAL or COLONEL beast would be. a corporal is not even an admirable rank in armies that use that ranking system. Yeah, it is a pking minigame, so any arguments anybody makes will probably be biased.The best way this will end :Everybody just says,"I'm not arguing with you anymore, goodbye."The worst way this will end: I don't really know, psychological warfare? Worldwide thermonuclear war? Pie eating contest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts