S-Net is overwhelmingly against the war of aggression by Japan.

Swiss public opinion is very slightly interventionalist in pay back for India's support, but they really don't care that much.

Sere, does South Asia respond like this?

Except that you cannot control a neutral country, since after all most of the Southeast Asian countries are controlled by Japan and are helping Japan. (Not Thailand, and whatever those countries)

The PRC has revealed that it's surgical robot has been complete, and is being used in hospitals, and tested for use in military field hospitals. Work continues on the classified project with several more facilities being built. It is rumored that Cambodia is almost finished with political talks.

 

Research:

Surgical robot: complete

Classified project II: (2/5)

Improved fuel cell: (3/6)

 

Annexation:

Cambodia: (4/5)

Switzerland drops an incendiary bomb, crashing onto one of the Japanese supercarriers, destroying 40 aircraft.

Japan withdraws from the conflict. India (probaly) stops firing. Mysteriously, there were absolutely no casualties.

 

Japan asks China to ask India to get the troops out of Malaysia.

Russia asks both India and Japan to stop fighting

Retech. There were casualties, since you engaged in full scale battle. Plus the aircraft carriers and such. You can't just revive everything because you decided it was a bad idea...

 

Video footage of the heroic acts of Australian soldiers to rescue civilians from a conflict which they didn't need to be involved in is spread across S-Net and Asian Television/radio stations.

(I said that there were basically no casualties because the war system is really bogus right now)(Not to mention Archi's somehow invincible bombers which he somehow developed with little money and a year)

 

Japan pulls back its blockade to around the (it's hard to explain, but sorta like from the tip of Indonesia around Malaysia and ends up off the coast of China, not too close to China of close)

 

Now there is no blockade on Malaysia.

We need to do something about the war system...

I propose a new thread dedicated to battles, with a war moderator, two, so no one is banned from war

 

Turn based, kind of like dungeoneering actions, one action, but you can do anything with your troops in that action. You have to say which troops you have deployed and reinforcements you have ready.

Well I guess it was sorta a good thing that I initiated that attack. Oh, I switch my vote from non-moderator to having Sere as moderator.

 

----

 

Somehow Rocco's submarines (of which there were 40) somehow bypassed 60 or so of my submarines + the superior amount of destroyers and frigates with his own navy.

Ummmm....no. (I think Laos is already going under China)

Rocco, play fair.

There are faults on both sides...

Well two can play at that game.

 

Anyways, my objections to your calculation:

1. You mobilized 4 million soldiers and somehow got them to Malaysia in a day.

2. Submarines normally don't pass other submarines that easily.

3. The international community did not send any soldiers.

4. Switzerland possesses an overpowered uber-bomber, which was ignored.

The PRC responds to India that Laos has already been annexed peacefully.

Russia offers most Asian countries that aren't either super powers or under potectorate, but if they are half way through becoming one, they're still asked

 

They offer them to sign a contract with Russia, if Japan or India tries to influence them, they will disagree, also Russia sends each country 500 Million to an economy going in their countries. I also offer them military protection, its up to vote if they decide it.

 

I've had enough Retech and Rocco [bleep]ing around with Asia, I swear to god...

Retech, don't ignore my weapons.

Well, I am just going to ignore it, like you ignored me. So you can choose to recognize it if you want, so enjoy your losses.

 

The 500,000 troops were contributed from Singapore and Indonesia. They're not that far away, and I'm sure the ships can hold them.

 

-------

 

In which case my fighters (not all of them were attacking of course) intercepted them, because of their superior technology.

Japan, Switzerland, need any missiles? I've got all sorts of them. :thumbsup:

Sigh....We really need a moderator...this is just getting stupid now.

Errr Mather, I'm good. There's already a better defence for that.

Japan losses:

1 battleship

8 destroyers

8 other assorted ships

6 subs

43,000 men

 

India losses:

1 carrier

24 destroyers

16 subs

96,000 men

 

 

Japan wins naval battle

India wins land battle

 

--

 

Indian troops now occupy Malaysia, though Indian sea supremacy has been hit hard and will need at least 5 years to recover.

 

*Is this agreeable for both parties?

 

--

 

Also I'd like to remind everyone that the logistics of supplying over a million men (land), or co-ordinating an attack of over 200,000 (naval) would be a nightmare. However, since this was a relatively short engagement it doesn't really matter. But if this had lasted longer than 6 months (in-game) the Indian army would've been decimated by disease and starvation, and the Japanese would've likely resorted to shooting nails for lack of bullets.

Mather you do not have ICBM's though ;). 4/5 for the annexation of france projects continue...