Zierro Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 This thread proves this forum is [developmentally delayed]ed. (excluding no one) Didn't you just say, like yesterday, that it's dumb to say someone "isn't thinking" just for having differing opinions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jernlov Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 What does [cabbage] posting even mean...Doing what you do and posting like "indie music is indie because it sucks and nobody likes it" - I'm aware that you're most likely having a sarcastic crack but it's not really warranted and doesn't add anything. Normally, I wouldn't have taken an issue; however, this is "Music, Movies and Television". I see this as a forum where you can discuss what you like and what you don't like as much as you want, although it does need to be kept within reasonable bounds. It's not your taste I'm actually taking an issue with, or even you yourself; just how you present your posts in this forum. It looks kind of arrogant, for want of a better word. The following section isn't actually directed at anyone; it's more general. I don't want to come off as a pretentious jerk-off, so take it lightly. "I don't particularly enjoy independent or underground music that much. I find I tend to enjoy more mainstream-oriented music because of x reason, y reason and z reason." is a perfectly agreeable and respectful response. Problems arise when someone decides to go out of their way and be a complete tool and act like "your taste sucks 'cause you listen to AC/DC; get some Boring Post-Rock Band #3331 on instead". Then the whole argument spirals out of control and becomes completely pointless, like every argument over music. People take delight in arguing over subjective crap all the time, an argument that neither side can win. You get frustrated and there's no satisfaction from winning the argument because you actually can't. I don't have much against bold statements as long as you're prepared to stand by them and not give in or act all "well it's just too deep for you" when someone disagrees. Discourse about music is pretty much fine but debating and arguing completely subjective points doesn't belong. This post is useless because it's not like anyone is going to listen to what I have to say but I felt I needed to post it. Summary: this forum is inherently subjective. Arguing s**ts up the board and gets on everyone's nerves. Steam | Soup | Last.fm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saru Inc Posted August 21, 2010 Share Posted August 21, 2010 This thread proves this forum is [developmentally delayed]ed. (excluding no one) Didn't you just say, like yesterday, that it's dumb to say someone "isn't thinking" just for having differing opinions? Yea but I wasn't talking about the opinions themselves. What does [cabbage] posting even mean...Doing what you do and posting like "indie music is indie because it sucks and nobody likes it" - I'm aware that you're most likely having a sarcastic crack but it's not really warranted and doesn't add anything. Normally, I wouldn't have taken an issue; however, this is "Music, Movies and Television". I see this as a forum where you can discuss what you like and what you don't like as much as you want, although it does need to be kept within reasonable bounds. It's not your taste I'm actually taking an issue with, or even you yourself; just how you present your posts in this forum. It looks kind of arrogant, for want of a better word. The following section isn't actually directed at anyone; it's more general. I don't want to come off as a pretentious jerk-off, so take it lightly. "I don't particularly enjoy independent or underground music that much. I find I tend to enjoy more mainstream-oriented music because of x reason, y reason and z reason." is a perfectly agreeable and respectful response. Problems arise when someone decides to go out of their way and be a complete tool and act like "your taste sucks 'cause you listen to AC/DC; get some Boring Post-Rock Band #3331 on instead". Then the whole argument spirals out of control and becomes completely pointless, like every argument over music. People take delight in arguing over subjective crap all the time, an argument that neither side can win. You get frustrated and there's no satisfaction from winning the argument because you actually can't. I don't have much against bold statements as long as you're prepared to stand by them and not give in or act all "well it's just too deep for you" when someone disagrees. Discourse about music is pretty much fine but debating and arguing completely subjective points doesn't belong. This post is useless because it's not like anyone is going to listen to what I have to say but I felt I needed to post it. Summary: this forum is inherently subjective. Arguing s**ts up the board and gets on everyone's nerves. Yea I was just being sarcastic. While, actually I think I was more of mocking, I said that a while ago and honestly I forget what I was thinking at the time. I like a couple indie bands, I just really dislike hipsters who are all "mainstream is for unintelligent people." And I also agree wholeheartedly on the rest of your post. I have all the 99s, and have been playing since 2001. Comped 4/30/15 My Araxxi Kills: 459::Araxxi Drops(KC):Araxxi Hilts: 4x Eye (14/126/149/459), Web - (100) Fang (193) Araxxi Legs Completed: 5 ---Top (69/206/234/292/361), Middle (163/176/278/343/395), Bottom (135/256/350/359/397)Boss Pets: Supreme - 848 KCIf you play Xbox One - Add me! GT: Urtehnoes - Currently on a Destiny binge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zierro Posted August 21, 2010 Share Posted August 21, 2010 Yea but I wasn't talking about the opinions themselves. Okay then, what exactly inspired you to label the entire forum (excluding no one) mentally challenged based off of one thread that only about 2-3% of the entire forum even posted in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saru Inc Posted August 21, 2010 Share Posted August 21, 2010 Yea but I wasn't talking about the opinions themselves. Okay then, what exactly inspired you to label the entire forum (excluding no one) mentally challenged based off of one thread that only about 2-3% of the entire forum even posted in? It's not just this thread, every thread is like this thread. If you can't see that then cbf. I have all the 99s, and have been playing since 2001. Comped 4/30/15 My Araxxi Kills: 459::Araxxi Drops(KC):Araxxi Hilts: 4x Eye (14/126/149/459), Web - (100) Fang (193) Araxxi Legs Completed: 5 ---Top (69/206/234/292/361), Middle (163/176/278/343/395), Bottom (135/256/350/359/397)Boss Pets: Supreme - 848 KCIf you play Xbox One - Add me! GT: Urtehnoes - Currently on a Destiny binge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dupin Posted August 21, 2010 Share Posted August 21, 2010 What does [cabbage] posting even mean...Doing what you do and posting like "indie music is indie because it sucks and nobody likes it" - I'm aware that you're most likely having a sarcastic crack but it's not really warranted and doesn't add anything. Normally, I wouldn't have taken an issue; however, this is "Music, Movies and Television". I see this as a forum where you can discuss what you like and what you don't like as much as you want, although it does need to be kept within reasonable bounds. It's not your taste I'm actually taking an issue with, or even you yourself; just how you present your posts in this forum. It looks kind of arrogant, for want of a better word. The following section isn't actually directed at anyone; it's more general. I don't want to come off as a pretentious jerk-off, so take it lightly. "I don't particularly enjoy independent or underground music that much. I find I tend to enjoy more mainstream-oriented music because of x reason, y reason and z reason." is a perfectly agreeable and respectful response. Problems arise when someone decides to go out of their way and be a complete tool and act like "your taste sucks 'cause you listen to AC/DC; get some Boring Post-Rock Band #3331 on instead". Then the whole argument spirals out of control and becomes completely pointless, like every argument over music. People take delight in arguing over subjective crap all the time, an argument that neither side can win. You get frustrated and there's no satisfaction from winning the argument because you actually can't. I don't have much against bold statements as long as you're prepared to stand by them and not give in or act all "well it's just too deep for you" when someone disagrees. Discourse about music is pretty much fine but debating and arguing completely subjective points doesn't belong. This post is useless because it's not like anyone is going to listen to what I have to say but I felt I needed to post it. Summary: this forum is inherently subjective. Arguing s**ts up the board and gets on everyone's nerves. You know what annoys me? People who complain about complaining. This is a thread based on opinions, obviously people are going to butt heads. ALL OF YOUR MUSIC SUCKS BECAUSE IT SUCKS AND IS AWFUL AND THAT IS WHY IT SUCKS the only music I like is in Disney movies and also Brian Cincotta on iTunes he's sexy and nobody knows about him which makes me feel special and that is why I post my opinions on an online forum to be flamed. [unspam] I will say that any modern music that has any potential at all will be ruined within the first week by all the radio stations playing it five times each hour. I don't mind 3OH!3 if it's only for a few minutes (although I will turn it off immediately if I hear "do the Hellen Keller"). It's when the whole world decides a song is the best thing since "Soulja Boy" that I start to dislike it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x1strife Posted August 21, 2010 Share Posted August 21, 2010 Eminem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alg Posted August 21, 2010 Share Posted August 21, 2010 [hide]Doing what you do and posting like "indie music is indie because it sucks and nobody likes it" - I'm aware that you're most likely having a sarcastic crack but it's not really warranted and doesn't add anything. Normally, I wouldn't have taken an issue; however, this is "Music, Movies and Television". I see this as a forum where you can discuss what you like and what you don't like as much as you want, although it does need to be kept within reasonable bounds. It's not your taste I'm actually taking an issue with, or even you yourself; just how you present your posts in this forum. It looks kind of arrogant, for want of a better word. The following section isn't actually directed at anyone; it's more general. I don't want to come off as a pretentious jerk-off, so take it lightly. "I don't particularly enjoy independent or underground music that much. I find I tend to enjoy more mainstream-oriented music because of x reason, y reason and z reason." is a perfectly agreeable and respectful response. Problems arise when someone decides to go out of their way and be a complete tool and act like "your taste sucks 'cause you listen to AC/DC; get some Boring Post-Rock Band #3331 on instead". Then the whole argument spirals out of control and becomes completely pointless, like every argument over music. People take delight in arguing over subjective crap all the time, an argument that neither side can win. You get frustrated and there's no satisfaction from winning the argument because you actually can't. I don't have much against bold statements as long as you're prepared to stand by them and not give in or act all "well it's just too deep for you" when someone disagrees. Discourse about music is pretty much fine but debating and arguing completely subjective points doesn't belong. This post is useless because it's not like anyone is going to listen to what I have to say but I felt I needed to post it. Summary: this forum is inherently subjective. Arguing s**ts up the board and gets on everyone's nerves.[/hide]Thank you =D> I painted some stuff and put it on tumblr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harakiri Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 MetallicaRed Hot Chili PeppersGuns N RosesColdplayAC/DCThat is all. Just gonna address a couple I've seen across the thread. Metallica- America's answer to the much more talented (in my opinion) Iron Maiden. Metallica has great stuff. The thing is, they really went downhill fast. They haven't been good in twenty years, so if we are addressing how overrated they are nowadays, I can agree. But their older stuff is some of the best metal to rock out to. Red Hot Chili Peppers- I love Red Hot Chili Peppers. They are not rock, they just are all over the place. The vocalist is really good, but I can also see how people would dislike the nonsensical lyrics. I personally think Stadium Arcadium is one of the greatest albums I've ever heard. Guns N Roses- Again, Axl Rose's scratchy vocals are a turn off for a lot of people. But musically, they are very talented. They did some amazing songs throughout their career, though once again we look at their modern career and I can see why you would say their newer stuff is overrated. Coldplay- I agree. I like Clocks and that's it. AC/DC- God awful singer+ God awful lyrics and musical arrangements. I've never liked them. Evanescence- I will fully admit this was my first rock band I really got into. When I was ten, eleven, all I listened to was jazz and eighties pop. But Evanescence became one of my favorite bands. I love the vocals, and while a lot of their songs, I see nowadays, aren't really too exciting, they were still a very talented group. Pearl Jam- I own their greatest hits album because Jeremy and Even Flow are two of my favorite songs. They had some good songs before they became more...laid back. They kind of died out as a rock band and did their own thing which doesn't appeal to me at all. But their rock is great. Personally, I would put these bands down: Linkin Park- Despite the fact I like some of their songs, I think they are just way overrated. They got mainstream and they were suddenly singing crap rock for Transformers and such. I think they had potential but went a wrong way. Green Day- Their early stuff was great. Their new stuff is god awful. Do you know your enemy is the only song I've heard from them the past year or so and I thought it was awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dupin Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 Green Day- Their early stuff was great. Their new stuff is god awful. Do you know your enemy is the only song I've heard from them the past year or so and I thought it was awful. I do agree that "Know Your Enemy" is pretty bad, although not their worst. But how can you say their new stuff is awful if it's the only song you've heard from the new album? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElkNight Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 Three Days Grace.I don't think anything else needs to be said. 8,180WONGTONG IS THE BEST AND IS MORE SUPERIOR THAN ME#1 Wongtong stalker.Im looking for some No Limit soldiers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_love_burritos Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 Three Days Grace.I don't think anything else needs to be said.Well ... at least no one will disagree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangeor Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 They're practically unheard of, at least in my area. I think they're fun to listen to; they always have interesting melodies. But they aren't anything special. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElkNight Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 They're practically unheard of, at least in my area.Wat. Always on radio here. 8,180WONGTONG IS THE BEST AND IS MORE SUPERIOR THAN ME#1 Wongtong stalker.Im looking for some No Limit soldiers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate_Felix Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 MetallicaRed Hot Chili PeppersGuns N RosesColdplayAC/DCThat is all. Just gonna address a couple I've seen across the thread. Metallica- America's answer to the much more talented (in my opinion) Iron Maiden. Metallica has great stuff. The thing is, they really went downhill fast. They haven't been good in twenty years, so if we are addressing how overrated they are nowadays, I can agree. But their older stuff is some of the best metal to rock out to. Red Hot Chili Peppers- I love Red Hot Chili Peppers. They are not rock, they just are all over the place. The vocalist is really good, but I can also see how people would dislike the nonsensical lyrics. I personally think Stadium Arcadium is one of the greatest albums I've ever heard. Guns N Roses- Again, Axl Rose's scratchy vocals are a turn off for a lot of people. But musically, they are very talented. They did some amazing songs throughout their career, though once again we look at their modern career and I can see why you would say their newer stuff is overrated. Coldplay- I agree. I like Clocks and that's it. AC/DC- God awful singer+ God awful lyrics and musical arrangements. I've never liked them. Evanescence- I will fully admit this was my first rock band I really got into. When I was ten, eleven, all I listened to was jazz and eighties pop. But Evanescence became one of my favorite bands. I love the vocals, and while a lot of their songs, I see nowadays, aren't really too exciting, they were still a very talented group. Pearl Jam- I own their greatest hits album because Jeremy and Even Flow are two of my favorite songs. They had some good songs before they became more...laid back. They kind of died out as a rock band and did their own thing which doesn't appeal to me at all. But their rock is great. Personally, I would put these bands down: Linkin Park- Despite the fact I like some of their songs, I think they are just way overrated. They got mainstream and they were suddenly singing crap rock for Transformers and such. I think they had potential but went a wrong way. Green Day- Their early stuff was great. Their new stuff is god awful. Do you know your enemy is the only song I've heard from them the past year or so and I thought it was awful.If you dont like St. Anger you just dont like trash. Nothing is wrong with St. Anger. Also Iron Maiden and Metallica arent in the same league (NWOBHM and Trash). Load and ReLoad have great songs on them (Until It Sleeps, King Nothing, Fuel, The Memory Remains, Unforgiven II, Low Man's Lyric), Garage Inc is god, The Black Album is kinda commercial but nothing is wrong with it and S&M is AWESOME. I think you haven't even listened to any of those albums. [hide]Felix, je moeder.Je moeder felixJe vader, felix.Felix, je oma.Felix, je ongelofelijk gave pwnaze avatar B)Felix, je moeder.[/hide] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 The newer Metallica sucks, seriously. The older, more thrashy/prog Metallica were so much better. 2257AD.TUMBLR.COM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcneilp Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 The newer Metallica sucks, seriously. The older, more thrashy/prog Metallica were so much better.Kinda agree here. Although with their newer stuff, I prefer Death Magnetic to St.Anger but thats not saying much. It isn't in the castle, It isn't in the mist, It's a calling of the waters, As they break to show, The new Black Death, With reactors aglow, Do you think your security, Can keep you in purity, You will not shake us off above or belowScottish frictionScottish fiction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate_Felix Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 I know Death Magnetic is [cabbage] mastering and the worst solo ever (My Apocalypse) but i still like All Nightmare Long and BB&S. But i cant see how people cant like St. Anger. To me its pure trash (low guitars, fast playing, snare without snare.) [hide]Felix, je moeder.Je moeder felixJe vader, felix.Felix, je oma.Felix, je ongelofelijk gave pwnaze avatar B)Felix, je moeder.[/hide] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 Death Magnetic was recorded way too loud for my liking, I get distortion my speakers and I'm not even playing it that loud. St. Anger just..sucks. 2257AD.TUMBLR.COM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate_Felix Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 Death Magnetic was recorded way too loud for my liking, I get distortion my speakers and I'm not even playing it that loud. St. Anger just..sucks.K you dont like trash metal thats okay. [hide]Felix, je moeder.Je moeder felixJe vader, felix.Felix, je oma.Felix, je ongelofelijk gave pwnaze avatar B)Felix, je moeder.[/hide] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 That's what the later stuff is - trash. 2257AD.TUMBLR.COM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate_Felix Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 That's what the later stuff is - trash. [hide]Felix, je moeder.Je moeder felixJe vader, felix.Felix, je oma.Felix, je ongelofelijk gave pwnaze avatar B)Felix, je moeder.[/hide] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harakiri Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 MetallicaRed Hot Chili PeppersGuns N RosesColdplayAC/DCThat is all. Just gonna address a couple I've seen across the thread. Metallica- America's answer to the much more talented (in my opinion) Iron Maiden. Metallica has great stuff. The thing is, they really went downhill fast. They haven't been good in twenty years, so if we are addressing how overrated they are nowadays, I can agree. But their older stuff is some of the best metal to rock out to. Red Hot Chili Peppers- I love Red Hot Chili Peppers. They are not rock, they just are all over the place. The vocalist is really good, but I can also see how people would dislike the nonsensical lyrics. I personally think Stadium Arcadium is one of the greatest albums I've ever heard. Guns N Roses- Again, Axl Rose's scratchy vocals are a turn off for a lot of people. But musically, they are very talented. They did some amazing songs throughout their career, though once again we look at their modern career and I can see why you would say their newer stuff is overrated. Coldplay- I agree. I like Clocks and that's it. AC/DC- God awful singer+ God awful lyrics and musical arrangements. I've never liked them. Evanescence- I will fully admit this was my first rock band I really got into. When I was ten, eleven, all I listened to was jazz and eighties pop. But Evanescence became one of my favorite bands. I love the vocals, and while a lot of their songs, I see nowadays, aren't really too exciting, they were still a very talented group. Pearl Jam- I own their greatest hits album because Jeremy and Even Flow are two of my favorite songs. They had some good songs before they became more...laid back. They kind of died out as a rock band and did their own thing which doesn't appeal to me at all. But their rock is great. Personally, I would put these bands down: Linkin Park- Despite the fact I like some of their songs, I think they are just way overrated. They got mainstream and they were suddenly singing crap rock for Transformers and such. I think they had potential but went a wrong way. Green Day- Their early stuff was great. Their new stuff is god awful. Do you know your enemy is the only song I've heard from them the past year or so and I thought it was awful.If you dont like St. Anger you just dont like trash. Nothing is wrong with St. Anger. Also Iron Maiden and Metallica arent in the same league (NWOBHM and Trash). Load and ReLoad have great songs on them (Until It Sleeps, King Nothing, Fuel, The Memory Remains, Unforgiven II, Low Man's Lyric), Garage Inc is god, The Black Album is kinda commercial but nothing is wrong with it and S&M is AWESOME. I think you haven't even listened to any of those albums. I have heard Metallica from every CD including Death Magnetic. They suck. The black album is a great album, and then their later ones (Justice For All) are great as well. Garage Inc was awful and ReLoad was as well. And Metallica is America's Iron Maiden whether you deny it or not. They were the popular metal of America, while every where else in the world, Iron Maiden was the metal of choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElkNight Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 Kill Em All is awesome. 8,180WONGTONG IS THE BEST AND IS MORE SUPERIOR THAN ME#1 Wongtong stalker.Im looking for some No Limit soldiers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate_Felix Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 MetallicaRed Hot Chili PeppersGuns N RosesColdplayAC/DCThat is all. Just gonna address a couple I've seen across the thread. Metallica- America's answer to the much more talented (in my opinion) Iron Maiden. Metallica has great stuff. The thing is, they really went downhill fast. They haven't been good in twenty years, so if we are addressing how overrated they are nowadays, I can agree. But their older stuff is some of the best metal to rock out to. Red Hot Chili Peppers- I love Red Hot Chili Peppers. They are not rock, they just are all over the place. The vocalist is really good, but I can also see how people would dislike the nonsensical lyrics. I personally think Stadium Arcadium is one of the greatest albums I've ever heard. Guns N Roses- Again, Axl Rose's scratchy vocals are a turn off for a lot of people. But musically, they are very talented. They did some amazing songs throughout their career, though once again we look at their modern career and I can see why you would say their newer stuff is overrated. Coldplay- I agree. I like Clocks and that's it. AC/DC- God awful singer+ God awful lyrics and musical arrangements. I've never liked them. Evanescence- I will fully admit this was my first rock band I really got into. When I was ten, eleven, all I listened to was jazz and eighties pop. But Evanescence became one of my favorite bands. I love the vocals, and while a lot of their songs, I see nowadays, aren't really too exciting, they were still a very talented group. Pearl Jam- I own their greatest hits album because Jeremy and Even Flow are two of my favorite songs. They had some good songs before they became more...laid back. They kind of died out as a rock band and did their own thing which doesn't appeal to me at all. But their rock is great. Personally, I would put these bands down: Linkin Park- Despite the fact I like some of their songs, I think they are just way overrated. They got mainstream and they were suddenly singing crap rock for Transformers and such. I think they had potential but went a wrong way. Green Day- Their early stuff was great. Their new stuff is god awful. Do you know your enemy is the only song I've heard from them the past year or so and I thought it was awful.If you dont like St. Anger you just dont like trash. Nothing is wrong with St. Anger. Also Iron Maiden and Metallica arent in the same league (NWOBHM and Trash). Load and ReLoad have great songs on them (Until It Sleeps, King Nothing, Fuel, The Memory Remains, Unforgiven II, Low Man's Lyric), Garage Inc is god, The Black Album is kinda commercial but nothing is wrong with it and S&M is AWESOME. I think you haven't even listened to any of those albums. I have heard Metallica from every CD including Death Magnetic. They suck. The black album is a great album, and then their later ones (Justice For All) are great as well. Garage Inc was awful and ReLoad was as well. And Metallica is America's Iron Maiden whether you deny it or not. They were the popular metal of America, while every where else in the world, Iron Maiden was the metal of choice.Theres a hole in my desk now due to you. First you imply that you have listened to every CD then you say metallica sucks. Then you imply that ...And Justice For All was made after the black album and then you say Garage Inc was awful just like ReLoad. And then you compare them to a different band because Metallica was popular in America and Iron Maiden was popular in England.Right how to fix this.First of listen to these:[hide=proving garage inc is pro]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nm9A3J294Ichttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byAwUZOtkAIhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoolQUDWq-khttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-u-HCHCuHMg&feature=fvstAnd many more i wont list because you probably wont listen to the[/hide][hide=proving ReLoad is cool]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ovgu1X2sgNUhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wdqo9aO0fyohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIN2jUL0eS8http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJ4JvUDhzZo[/hide]Note i only listed the songs which i think are 5/5Now the other part.Metallica/The Black Album Studio album by MetallicaReleased August 13, 1991…And Justice for All Studio album by MetallicaReleased August 25, 1988 or September 6, 1988And then to compare:[hide=Iron Maiden's Signature Song]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mHe6FMs46o&feature=fvst[/hide][hide=Metallica's Signature Song]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_z-hEyVQDRA&feature=fvst[/hide]I dont think you are in your right mind to compare two songs like those. [hide]Felix, je moeder.Je moeder felixJe vader, felix.Felix, je oma.Felix, je ongelofelijk gave pwnaze avatar B)Felix, je moeder.[/hide] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now