Sam Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 Kill Em All is awesome. SEEEEK AND, SEEEK AND DESTROY! 2257AD.TUMBLR.COM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zierro Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 I dont think you are in your right mind to compare two songs like those. Iron Maiden and Metallica do have a world of difference between them, but surely there has to be something about them that brings the same bunch of people to these same two bands? They're like the peanut butter and jelly of music. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alg Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Theres a hole in my desk now due to you. First you imply that you have listened to every CD then you say metallica sucks. Then you imply that ...And Justice For All was made after the black album and then you say Garage Inc was awful just like ReLoad. And then you compare them to a different band because Metallica was popular in America and Iron Maiden was popular in England.Right how to fix this.First of listen to these:[hide=proving garage inc is pro]vids[/hide][hide=proving ReLoad is cool]vids[/hide]Note i only listed the songs which i think are 5/5Now the other part.Metallica/The Black Album Studio album by MetallicaReleased August 13, 1991And Justice for All Studio album by MetallicaReleased August 25, 1988 or September 6, 1988And then to compare:more vidsI dont think you are in your right mind to compare two songs like those.You also have a few like this in their favor:[hide]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlpiUyoRw64[/hide] I painted some stuff and put it on tumblr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naraku893 Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Justin BeiberMiley CyrusThe Jonas BrothersLady GagaKe$haAll rap musicThe Beatles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harakiri Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 I dont think you are in your right mind to compare two songs like those. Iron Maiden and Metallica do have a world of difference between them, but surely there has to be something about them that brings the same bunch of people to these same two bands? They're like the peanut butter and jelly of music. It's just the fact the two are heavy metal from the eighties at the same time. Metallica was the most popular metal band in America, Iron Maiden everywhere but America. While musically I've always found Metallica to be a lot more metal and Iron Maiden to be more of thinking man's metal, though some songs more so than others, just because they were the first really popular metal bands I think that's why they are compared as often as they are. And personally I do think they are the bread and butter of metal. I just hate any post eighties Metallica. Likewise, Iron Maiden has had some terrible albums as well during the nineties. And I agree a bit with Naraku on The Beatles. I like some of their stuff, but otherwise they just don't sound great. It's like the music is doing one thing and the singer another... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Justin BeiberMiley CyrusThe Jonas BrothersLady GagaKe$haAll rap musicThe Beatles What makes you say The Beatles are overrated? 2257AD.TUMBLR.COM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzcut3 Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 I love both Iron Maiden and Metallica, but come on, you just can't compare the two, and it's very hard to call one more over rated than the other. Metallica: Early stuff is godlike. Older stuff is decent, not great. There are some good songs on Load and Reload, despite popular opinion. If they had made only one album and just combined the two, IMO it would have sold more copies than Black. Yes, Metallica did change after Cliff died. And Death Magnetic is better than people on this topic are giving credit for. If you have an issue with how it was recorded, go on Youtube and listen to live performances of the songs. Iron Maiden: I love Maiden, but it seems there are more Maiden lovers than haters. Metallica haters are using the logic that Cliff died ruined Metallica, and there is no denying that the sound vastly changed, but what was Maiden when Bruce decided he'd go solo? They weren't exactly putting out top material. Out of their recent stuff, Dance of Death is amazing, A Matter of Life and Death.... not so much. [email protected] - EoS Former Leader - Message if you need anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surprise Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Pop. Sorry I would list them all but I would be here forever doing that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 You don't like 'popular' music? 2257AD.TUMBLR.COM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alg Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Pop really isn't used to mean "popular" anymore as much as referring to a style of music I think... I painted some stuff and put it on tumblr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harakiri Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 I love both Iron Maiden and Metallica, but come on, you just can't compare the two, and it's very hard to call one more over rated than the other. Metallica: Early stuff is godlike. Older stuff is decent, not great. There are some good songs on Load and Reload, despite popular opinion. If they had made only one album and just combined the two, IMO it would have sold more copies than Black. Yes, Metallica did change after Cliff died. And Death Magnetic is better than people on this topic are giving credit for. If you have an issue with how it was recorded, go on Youtube and listen to live performances of the songs. Iron Maiden: I love Maiden, but it seems there are more Maiden lovers than haters. Metallica haters are using the logic that Cliff died ruined Metallica, and there is no denying that the sound vastly changed, but what was Maiden when Bruce decided he'd go solo? They weren't exactly putting out top material. Out of their recent stuff, Dance of Death is amazing, A Matter of Life and Death.... not so much. I agree that despite the fact I think Iron Maiden tops Metallica, Iron Maiden was terrible without Bruce [bleep]ensen. Live After Death is the single worst album in my collection because the guy who took his place can't sing worth a crap. Bruce may be old, but he is still a great singer, even live. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dax Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 The abomination that is 'pop' music makes me lose hope for people that enjoy it. ;_; #KERR2016/17/18/19/20/21. #rpgformod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wisp Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 Justin BeiberMiley CyrusThe Jonas BrothersLady GagaKe$haAll rap musicThe Beatles What makes you say The Beatles are overrated?And all rap? I'd be willing to bet Naraku hasn't spent much time listening to rap, other than the mainstream crap. Hegemony-Spain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mrmegakirby Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 It seems that if someone likes a band or artist, they're over rated by them. If they dislike a band/artist, then they're under rated by that person. As a whole, though, most MTV artists are over-rated (but not untalented, just over rated). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dupin Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 Justin BeiberMiley CyrusThe Jonas BrothersLady GagaKe$haAll rap musicThe Beatles What makes you say The Beatles are overrated?And all rap? I'd be willing to bet Naraku hasn't spent much time listening to rap, other than the mainstream crap. It's not that unusual to not like rap. If he doesn't like songs where there isn't any singing, I would understand why he wouldn't bother searching for rap that isn't full of auto-tuning and rich guys talking about how badass they are. Fort Minor=Good rap, mostly. And Eminem has some decent stuff. As for the Beatles, I sort of agree. I like some of their songs, but there are people out there who are just crazy about them. People like to act like they were gods when really they were just druggies with some musical talent. Seriously, when someone quotes "We Are the Walrus" it's gone too far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 It's not so much, but I personally think that The Beatles were a driving force of rock 'n roll as it is today. Without The Beatles (and a fair few other bands) music wouldn't be what it is today. The earlier material they made may not of been influential but the later drug infused music really was. It's fair to say they are a little overrated but the influence they had on modern music can't be denied. 2257AD.TUMBLR.COM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bows Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 It's not so much, but I personally think that The Beatles were a driving force of rock 'n roll as it is today. Without The Beatles (and a fair few other bands) music wouldn't be what it is today. The earlier material they made may not of been influential but the later drug infused music really was. It's fair to say they are a little overrated but the influence they had on modern music can't be denied.I agree Sam. The Beatles were also the first real 'boy-band.' So, N`Sync and The Backstreet Boys are offspring of The Beatles. Think of it that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obtaurian Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 About Metallica: It's not really that their newer stuff is "bad" (though a LOT of it is), it's more that their first four albums offered something "new" to music, and then they completely stopped trying. Newer songs like Fuel and St. Anger aren't that bad (I actually really like Fuel), but there's nothing innovative, creative, or progressive about them. They just stopped trying, really. Iron Maiden and Metallica aren't really comparable. Iron Maiden is more comparable to Slayer, where both bands had a great thing and kept doing their great thing without really changing it over the years (difference being that Iron Maiden had a few flop albums). You can pretty much pick up any Slayer album and enjoy it, but the first few are always going to be better because they were doing something new back then. To put it bluntly, [bleep] off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 It's not so much, but I personally think that The Beatles were a driving force of rock 'n roll as it is today. Without The Beatles (and a fair few other bands) music wouldn't be what it is today. The earlier material they made may not of been influential but the later drug infused music really was. It's fair to say they are a little overrated but the influence they had on modern music can't be denied.I agree Sam. The Beatles were also the first real 'boy-band.' So, N`Sync and The Backstreet Boys are offspring of The Beatles. Think of it that way. I wouldn't say they were the first 'boy-band', they just built upon the foundations of rock 'n roll and changed it forever. 2257AD.TUMBLR.COM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dupin Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 Right. The problem is that while many bands may have been revolutionary in their time, they don't seem so great looking back on it. Nirvana comes to mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 I wouldn't say Nirvana were revolutionary, in all honesty. I think they're actually a tad overrated. 2257AD.TUMBLR.COM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgehog Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 I wouldn't say Nirvana were revolutionary, in all honesty. I think they're actually a tad overrated. Couldn't agree more. I had a huge post typed out about how Nirvana did very little to the music community compared to what most people think they did. I didn't end up posting it, though, because I realized i sounded like a total douche halfway through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alg Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 I wouldn't say Nirvana were revolutionary, in all honesty. I think they're actually a tad overrated. Couldn't agree more. I had a huge post typed out about how Nirvana did very little to the music community compared to what most people think they did. I didn't end up posting it, though, because I realized i sounded like a total douche halfway through.I'm thinking a lot of their influence comes from the fact that Cobain died young. I painted some stuff and put it on tumblr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jernlov Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 Nirvana effectively gave us Nickelback and Creed. Steam | Soup | Last.fm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dax Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 I'm not a fan of Nirvana, though I will keep the best of. :anxious: #KERR2016/17/18/19/20/21. #rpgformod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now