Also Archi, can you give me the price for those Boeing Avenger SAM launchers?

Hey Rocco, do you have msn or steam?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Laser_Avenger

 

That one?

The US has started selling weapons to you?

No, the mount:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AN/TWQ-1_Avenger

 

Retech, they're really old... though maybe I should be looking for Swedish ones instead.

So not Boeing...

 

Probably around 5 Million.

They're still advanced military technology.

 

Archi, for that post with troop numbers, which country is that?

Inonesia just has a million Sarcasm and Irony missiles.

Not Germany, has to be European though

 

I think it's Italy.

Boeing's the manufacturer.

 

 

Wait a minute, I have some equally good ones made localy.

What do you estimate is the price for these?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_93_Surface-to-air_missile

Same?

I'll take those then, 1,000 of them.

Thanks Mather, for reminding me of the importance of not only having a strong air force, but a strong anti-air defence system. Thusly, we are investing 3 billion into that and 6 billion into submarines. (All OOC, if it matters)

 

All for defensive purposes, I assure you!

What else can you expect from a nation that is still recovering from an air raid?

Defencive yes, SAM missiles aren't practical for assault... unless you plan on staying for a while.

I don't think SAMs really work against ICBMs.

Well, ICBMs are just about as big as fighters, actually they're more often than not both bigger and slower, plus they don't try to shake them off.

They still make a big boom when the ICBM is hit.

 

 

Hence why they don't put SAMs in major cities to prevent nuclear annhialation.

No, retech high explosives and nukes generally don't work like gunpowder. Take C-4 for example, it can be burnt safely and can be hit relatively safely but if (and only if) you combine increased pressure and temperature will it detonate to cause an explosion and Most likely a SAM wouldn't cause the necessary stimulus. Nukes are generally a fair bit more picky than high explosives as to what stimuli are needed to detonate them (the splitting of an atom/implosion of fissile material are not caused by impact with a SAM generally). Rather they don't use SAMs because even if they could hit the nuke carrying ICBM (which is damned close to impossible) you've just distributed radioactive material into the upper atmosphere! I hope Detroit likes being even more [cabbage]ty now.

ICBMs also have an average speed of 3 Kilometers per Second, with the fastest at 7 KM/s

Compared to Missiles, which rarely go above mach 4, or 1.2 Kilometers per Second.

I think it's Italy.

 

I've invested 11b in vehicles + 4b in troops. So, (unless I can get that for 10b?) not me. :P

 

By the way; Unless I post otherwise, this will be my budget for last year and future years:

 

5b-Military Vehicles

4b-Troops

6b -Vehicles

40b - Project A

40b - Project B

THIS YEAR ONLY: 2.5b in troops, 2.5b in vehicles, 5b to be paid off to grim. (has already been paid)

2b - Project green

 

Anything remaining is infrastructure.

I believe that America still owns the rights to the f-35 fighters. Therefore nobody since us should have them, seeing as I posted earlier that all military contracts with foreign nations are cancelled.

Though I asked this, seems it didn't get posted;

What's the price for a missile shield?

Depends what sort of defence you are gonna go with.

Regional, National, Boost Phase, Mid Phase, Terminal Phase, Exoatmospheric, Endoatomspheric, Strategic, Tactical, Theater.

Lasers, Missiles, Brilliant Pebbles

 

Generally, the wider the net you try to throw, the less efficent the net is.

You can only ever intercept an equal number of missiles to your effective defence...You cannot take down twenty missiles with five.

And, of course, whether you want to to launch an overwhelming defence (Say fifty missiles per missle) or just a 1:1 sort of thing. Since, at present, missiles have a 60% chance of hitting, two missiles should be able to intercept 1 missile. However:

8,10,1,8,8,4,10,3,9,1,3,2,2,1,1,8,6,3,1,6,6,10,4,1,3,3,8,9,7,4,6,2,6,3,6,5,1,8,8,10,3,2,8,8,7,3,6,6,4,10,

 

So 6 out of 25 Missile got through on this test.

On a 3:1 thing would let through 2 out of 12.

ect.

I only understood about half of what you said there.

I think what I want would be a national laser-type, how's the efficiency there?

Ground-based National Lasers system.

About 400 Billion, can hit about 200 missiles at any given time, needs a decently powerful power grid, 55% chance.