People are saying not to stereotype all Muslims because of these riots or whtever you would call them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry, it were Muslims that crashed a plane into the world trade centre.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry, it were muslims who bombed Madrid 911 days after the above.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry, it were Muslims that bombed London last year.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Islam is not a religion of peace, because it was founded by war. You can expect people who were brought up with a bloody and violent religion to react to somethign so trivial with violence.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In Britain, Muslims are certainly different PUBLICALLY to the Muslims in the Middle-East. Why? Because if you said that you should spread Islam with the sword in a non-Muslim country you can expect trouble.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am no using this to critisize or insult Islam, but to understand why these "extremists" act the way you do you have to examine their deep-rooted view of the world. That view comes from Islam.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I look forward to being warned for this....maybe even threatened with death....

Sorry, it were Muslims that crashed a plane into the world trade centre.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Although I see you point, and it is legitimate to what you see. But understand that there is a whole different perspective when I look at things such as 9/11, and who did it. Im not going to post this video yet, but I know of a video that PROVES someone else did the 9/11 attacks. And until I recieve an administrators consent, I wont reveal this video.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have seen it many times, the video evidence is the exact same evidence as seen on television, but it reveals things that one would never imagine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dont say Muslims crashed a plane into the WTC, because I, and a lot of other people who saw this video belive otherwise.

None of you live in Denmark like I do, here in Denmark no muslims have reacted in a way that the muslims in arabic countries do, in fact polls have shown that the situation has helped integration more, the muslims here in Denmark believe that is is overreacting to burn and slaughter innocent people.

Although I see you point, and it is legitimate to what you see. But understand that there is a whole different perspective when I look at things such as 9/11, and who did it. Im not going to post this video yet, but I know of a video that PROVES someone else did the 9/11 attacks. And until I recieve an administrators consent, I wont reveal this video.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have seen it many times, the video evidence is the exact same evidence as seen on television, but it reveals things that one would never imagine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dont say Muslims crashed a plane into the WTC, because I, and a lot of other people who saw this video belive otherwise.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yeah, I'm waiting for an Admin's permission to post the video of the wizard who killed Kennedy with a magic silver bullet.

yea funny guy... your all jokes... har har

I'm not exactly defending the riots that are going on in the Middle East but to stereotype ALL Muslims as radical, militant extremists is wrong.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, the people that flew the planes into the WTC and the Pentagon were Muslim but not every single Muslim in the world supported or helped that operation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The same applies to the other situations pointed out earlier. These terrorists are using the Islamic religion as an excuse to wage a political war on America and the West. Their political views should not be confused with the Islamic faith.

I'd love to post what I think of what's going on, but I'll prolly get in trouble for it :(

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But hey, look at another example why Islam is great and everything http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/a ... oryid=5183

I'd love to post what I think of what's going on, but I'll prolly get in trouble for it :(

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But hey, look at another example why Islam is great and everything http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/a ... oryid=5183

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Know that there are 2 types of muslims. Sunni and Sheites. Iran is Sheite, and is more strict in their ruling. Sunni Muslims follow the prophet Muhammed, and are the ones who are peaceful, trying to follow the daily life inwhich Muhammed would live. And yes, there are Sunni extremists who wanna blow up things, burn flags and stuff... But Iran is Sheite... makesure you know the difference.

 

 

 

Know that there are 2 types of muslims. Sunni and Sheites. Iran is Sheite, and is more strict in their ruling. Sunni Muslims follow the prophet Muhammed, and are the ones who are peaceful, trying to follow the daily life inwhich Muhammed would live. And yes, there are Sunni extremists who wanna blow up things, burn flags and stuff... But Iran is Sheite... makesure you know the difference.

Know that there are not 2 "types" of muslims. Know that there are several additional ones. The main difference between the two most popular versions of Islam is a different idea of who should be in charge (there are most likely websites which explains this compliacted historical issue in detail, and hence I fail to see the need go into details), mainly of spiritual issues. There is no factual basis to what you are implying, namely that Shia is a more violent faith than Sunni. You see, Shia muslims also follow the prophet Muhammed and strive to be peacefull. Yes, it is within the realm of possibilties that there are more Shiite extremists than Sunni extremists. However, using that suspicion as grounds for claiming that Sunni equals peace and Shia equals oppression is unbelievable foolish.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am of the belief that there have been more Catholic extremists than Protestantic extremists. This does not by any means imply that Catholics are more violent than Protestants. The same applies to Islam.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dont say Muslims crashed a plane into the WTC, because I, and a lot of other people who saw this video belive otherwise.

For your information I, and a lot of other enlightened souls who do not consider an online video factual evidence strong enough to invalidize information provided to us over the course of several years, believe you to be the kind of person who is easily fooled by theories of conspiracy because it makes them feel special.

I'm not exactly defending the riots that are going on in the Middle East but to stereotype ALL Muslims as radical, militant extremists is wrong.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, the people that flew the planes into the WTC and the Pentagon were Muslim but not every single Muslim in the world supported or helped that operation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The same applies to the other situations pointed out earlier. These terrorists are using the Islamic religion as an excuse to wage a political war on America and the West. Their political views should not be confused with the Islamic faith.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I kind of agree with you but I can see where pur304 is coming from. It's hard not to be stereotypical when this stuff keeps happening. Now its even over something as trivial as a cartoon. Even the peaceful muslims are protesting and I don't understand why. I see cartoons about Jesus all the time that could be considered "blashphamas (sp?)" (just watch family guy and see how many times they portray Jesus as something that is against the Bible :lol: (and its funny) ) but I just take it as a joke and even think its funny sometimes. Protesting over a cartoon that was meant to be taken as a joke shows something about their faith.

I apologize... that is true. Extremists in any religion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For your information I, and a lot of other enlightened souls who do not consider an online video factual evidence strong enough to invalidize information provided to us over the course of several years, believe you to be the kind of person who is easily fooled by theories of conspiracy because it makes them feel special.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ok, enlightened souls.... considering online videos are not true ok ok... And you have seen the video to say that the evidence isnt strong???? And me being fooled? I have seen this video countless times. My Advanced Law teacher has seen this video, and even showed it to us. I could easily say that your being fooled by the media, but I chose not too, cause thats your belief, and I respect that. And saying that Im being fooled is ignorant, cause you dont even know what video Im talking about, you have no idea who directed in it, nor do you know the evidence they featured.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And I dont feel special. I dont see myself any different than you, or the next guy. Yes, Ive seen COUNTLESS videos suggesting a conspiracy, and YES I believe them.. but I certainly dont feel privilaged over anyone. I could careless what you think, nor could carless what the next guy does.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bottom line - stop assuming you know what Im talking about when you clearly dont, because I didnt say anything about the video (and I made sure I didnt), and stop assuming that I think Im special or privilaged over you, because I dont!

And you have seen the video to say that the evidence isnt strong???? And me being fooled? I have seen this video countless times. My Advanced Law teacher has seen this video, and even showed it to us. I could easily say that your being fooled by the media, but I chose not too, cause thats your belief, and I respect that. And saying that Im being fooled is ignorant, cause you dont even know what video Im talking about, you have no idea who directed in it, nor do you know the evidence they featured.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I wouldn't think a video of the WTC towers going down would have a director.

Har har, you funny guy... at it again... looking a lil mistakes I make, and announce it to everyone in the forum. Your post is completely useless, and irrelevent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And what I meant was the director of the film! You knew exactly what I meant, just you cant miss a chance to be funny guy.

Har har, you funny guy... at it again... looking a lil mistakes I make, and announce it to everyone in the forum. Your post is completely useless, and irrelevent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And what I meant was the director of the film! You knew exactly what I meant, just you cant miss a chance to be funny guy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think he is trying to point out how rediculous you're idea of someone directing 9/11 as a fake. Do you truely think it was all fake or something?

are you crazy? Who got the bright idea of me saying someone directing 9/11?! I was refering to a video, about 9/11! I didnt say anything about 9/11 the movie... maybe you and rocketman should look at the previous posts, and get a clear idea of what I was really talking about... ok?

are you crazy? Who got the bright idea of me saying someone directing 9/11?! I was refering to a video, about 9/11! I didnt say anything about 9/11 the movie... maybe you and rocketman should look at the previous posts, and get a clear idea of what I was really talking about... ok?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ahh you were talking about who directed your conspericy movie?

 

 

 

Misunderstanding I guess. Was just caught up in the rediculousness of the idea of it being a conspericy.

You know what.. thats ok. Call my beliefs ridiculous... but know that I wouldnt believe in something unless I knew for a fact there is a slight possibility its true..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I expected everyone in the forum to call me a fool, think what Im talking about is ridiculous. I knew I wouldnt get any support what-so-ever. And thats kool with me.. but know that I would never inturn kick you down cause your beliefs seem radical to me.

are you crazy? Who got the bright idea of me saying someone directing 9/11?! I was refering to a video, about 9/11! I didnt say anything about 9/11 the movie... maybe you and rocketman should look at the previous posts, and get a clear idea of what I was really talking about... ok?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No, you never mentioned a movie about 9/11, you mentioned a tape that revealed more than the general public saw (which I interpreted as you created a tape in your head that runs longer, shows more, whatever).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I read all the previous posts, you're just insane.

Ok funny guy, if you actrualy read the post.... I said that I know of a video that shows more than the public has seen, ABOUT 9/11! And your interpretation is based on what exactly? And Im insane... your the saying you read all previous posts but you missed the one about the 9/11 vid?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry, it were Muslims that crashed a plane into the world trade centre.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Although I see you point, and it is legitimate to what you see. But understand that there is a whole different perspective when I look at things such as 9/11, and who did it. Im not going to post this video yet, but I know of a video that PROVES someone else did the 9/11 attacks. And until I recieve an administrators consent, I wont reveal this video.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have seen it many times, the video evidence is the exact same evidence as seen on television, but it reveals things that one would never imagine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dont say Muslims crashed a plane into the WTC, because I, and a lot of other people who saw this video belive otherwise.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Right there..... in black and white.... I believe it was page 9-10.. something like that

And Im insane... your the saying you read all previous posts but you missed the one about the 9/11 vid?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actually, every time I've quoted your posts and posted on this thread, it's been related to your posting about your video. Look, I didn't understand you were talking about a documentary, you made it seem like it was just bonus footage. It's just really hard to take you seriously when you give such a vague description about the video (more like no description), and then go on to say you won't post it until someone tells you you can. Just grow some cohones and post the video or don't bother talking about it.

Maybe.... JUST MAYBE.... The description was vague because I didnt want to 1. Offend anyone 2. Get in trouble by Admins 3. Completely change this whole posts topic into 9/11, when its clearly about Extremists getting a lil out of hand. And I did ask if I could post it, and I was told no I shouldnt, because it would reopen scars.. And I dont know about you, I am going to respect what the Admins want, because this is their forum. And the only reason I keep talking about it is cause funny guys like you keep talking about it... and I really want to post it, but I cant... so the next best thing is talking about it with funny guys.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Geesh.. :?

Maybe.... JUST MAYBE.... The description was vague because I didnt want to 1. Offend anyone 2. Get in trouble by Admins 3. Completely change this whole posts topic into 9/11, when its clearly about Extremists getting a lil out of hand. And I did ask if I could post it, and I was told no I shouldnt, because it would reopen scars.. And I dont know about you, I am going to respect what the Admins want, because this is their forum. And the only reason I keep talking about it is cause funny guys like you keep talking about it... and I really want to post it, but I cant... so the next best thing is talking about it with funny guys.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Geesh.. :?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh, okay, well when you get a chance, pm that movie to me, I wond't get 1: Offended 2: You won't get in trouble by the admins 3: I'm cool about 9/11 talk.

 

 

 

Ok, enlightened souls.... considering online videos are not true ok ok... And you have seen the video to say that the evidence isnt strong???? And me being fooled? I have seen this video countless times. My Advanced Law teacher has seen this video, and even showed it to us. I could easily say that your being fooled by the media, but I chose not too, cause thats your belief, and I respect that. And saying that Im being fooled is ignorant, cause you dont even know what video Im talking about, you have no idea who directed in it, nor do you know the evidence they featured.

 

 

 

You seem to be missinformed. You see, in order to be able to form an educated idea of the events of the world it is not necesary to watch or read every article/movie published on the subject.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As an example: There are several documentaries that claim man never landed on the moon. I find this claim stupid beyond belief, and I belittle those who believe this without even having seen the actual documentaries themselves, though I have heard the arguments used in these vidoes aswell as the counter-arguments countless times.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To continue with the examples, let's assume someone here claims the Holocaust never occured. As proof he claims to have seen a video. Now, anyone with half a brain would realize how ignorant that claim is and they would do so without having watched said media, simply because it is an historical fact. You can alter a video, but you cannot alter history (though you can alter the interpretation if it).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let us assume there is a video in circulation which proves beyond reasonable doubt that those who captured the planes used in the WTC attack were not Muslims. It wouldn't take long before newspapers all around the world found this, and since the #1 goal for the majority of the newspapers out there is to make money, most of them would publish it. Yes, it is possible that a few newspapers would lie to cover this up because they have an agenda. But all of them? That is not very realistic. However, claiming that the media conspires to hide the truth from the masses is one of the most popular excuses used by the conspiracy theorists.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is also the fact that with the technology available today it is possible to modify video footage in nearly any way you can imagine. If a professional were to cut together a video where you could see who shot Kennedy, neither you nor me would be able to see if it was authentic or not.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hence we reach the following conclusions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- It is impossible to read/watch every article/video of a subject, and hence it is not necesary to truly understand the events of the world.

 

 

 

- It is not particularily likely that the media is controlled by a world-wide conspiracy seeking to put blame on Islam.

 

 

 

- It is possible to create digital "proof".

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Because of the above, I find it unnescesary to "respect your belief". It is just another conspiracy theory, and shall be belittled as such. You ARE being fooled, and I assure you that one day you will be aware of that. However, I doubt that day will be today, and because of this I can only argue for the benefit of others who may be influenced by similar videos. The world would be a better place if people were more sceptical to things they see.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

but know that I wouldnt believe in something unless I knew for a fact there is a slight possibility its true..

Of course there is a slight possibility that it is true, just as there is a slight possible that I shot Kennedy, that man didn't land on the moon and that the media is being controlled by a worldwide conspiracy. It's just not particularily likely.

Attacking an embassy is an act of war. I'm surprised there wasn't a UN response after that. I can understand protesting.

Attacking an embassy is an act of war. I'm surprised there wasn't a UN response after that. I can understand protesting.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maybe because the UN can't declare war? :idea: