Jump to content

My problem with Ahrim's and Karil's armor


fires_scape

Recommended Posts

Why does Ahrim's and Karil's armor have to have 70 defence requirenment, that's freaking crazy. :wall: Rangers and mages don't really gain defence levels as fast as the melees. I completely understand having 70 def req on the melee barrows but not on the mages and rangers. Jagex should atleast drop it down to 60. Oh and Karil's special is the worst special there is. How useful is having your opponents agility lowered? Maybe they will regain a bit less energy, but that it. They should atleast make it so that is slows down the opponent or takes away their energy.

2999860181_8824737a1a.jpg?v=0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

karils and torags go hand in hand while in the wildy, but the effects are of no use as there is the 20 second(or 10 in some cases) hold from ice barrage

 

 

 

 

 

i would also believe that this topic would belong in rants

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does Ahrim's and Karil's armor have to have 70 defence requirenment, that's freaking crazy. :wall: Rangers and mages don't really gain defence levels as fast as the melees. I completely understand having 70 def req on the melee barrows but not on the mages and rangers. Jagex should atleast drop it down to 60. Oh and Karil's special is the worst special there is. How useful is having your opponents agility lowered? Maybe they will regain a bit less energy, but that it. They should atleast make it so that is slows down the opponent or takes away their energy.

 

i dont see a problem here, barrows are mean to be 70defence amour, it is like asking why ahrim staff need 70 attack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont see a problem here, barrows are mean to be 70defence amour, it is like asking why ahrim staff need 70 attack

 

 

 

because staves double as a melee weapon? :roll:

 

 

 

 

 

and barrows are superior forms of armour, you wouldnt go with blue mage robes if you were to pk with 90+ mage unless you really wanted to lose the things you are carrying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Karils has awesome defence.

 

 

 

And why would a 1 def pure want to wear karils? It's a 70 defence requirment for a reason.

If anyone remembers me... PM ME. having nostaligia issues D:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many actual, true rangers/mages are there though? Hardly any... By true I mean only have Ranging/mage + defence on a main account.

sig3xj6.png

 

newbankofrsyq0.gif

^^ Support it or get confused by pixel-mess :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They all need a def leve as def is not specific to any set attack type

 

 

 

hence it is a general requirement for the armour

 

 

 

The weapins then have the set specific requirements

Plv6Dz6.jpg

Operation Gold Sparkles :: Chompy Kills ::  Full Profound :: Champions :: Barbarian Notes :: Champions Tackle Box :: MA Rewards

Dragonkin Journals :: Ports Stories :: Elder Chronicles :: Boss Slayer :: Penance King :: Kal'gerion Titles :: Gold Statue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i only agree that karils is a bad special and have low defense 70 defense requirement is to high for its low defense also ahrim should have same defenses as rune armour (withouth shield) and karil have a bit more than black d hide

Give a man a lighter, and he will be warm for a while.

Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to see a lvl 70 pure with 82 magic and strength in full Ahrims -.- . Imo the defence reqs are needed, and to teh guy that wanst Ahrims to have teh same stats as rune armour: Why give mages armour that gives a +100 mage bonus the same stats as rune armour???? Rune armour has a huge mage penalty and you want rune armour with a huge mage bonus? =; No way.

 

 

 

Oh and the Krils spec is bad it should be changed.

Retired

2146 overall - 136 combat - 6 skillcapes

 

Plus I think the whole teenage girl thing will end soon (hopefully), because my girlfriend is absolutely in love with him(she is 18), and im beginning to feel threatened by his [Justin Bieber] dashing looks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the defence requirement was lowered, that would mean they have to lower the defence stats...is that what you want?

bflinty1.png

Drops: Barrows: 60+ DK: 4... Dragon: 60+ Whips: 2... GWD: 0...ouch!

Main Goal: 2000 total with no 99's

bflinty1.png

bflinty1.png

bflinty1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im testing my avatar

 

 

 

i think that is so that peoples combat arent lvl 50 in that armour

_______________

Excuisador 90 att 46 def 99 str @ 100.89cb

Ar--edhel 84 def 85 hp 93 range 92 magic @93

FarCry - retired

Ar-edhel 99 att 99 str 99 hp 99 range 97 magic @117

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO:

 

They should keep the reqs. The reqs for the armour are basic for Barrows, all of them have to be 70... Thats because Barrows armour is the best there is (might be dragon, but thats way too expensive).

 

All of the armour has 70 def req, and thats for a reason.

 

 

 

They however should change the Karils set effect. To lower someone's agility is only usefull at the wildy agility course, so your target cant search for cover at the agility course. But the people who want to raise their agility there, dont really have anything with them (except for food/agi pots)... So it still is pretty useless..

Why do we bake cookies, but cook bacon


99/99/80+ looking for monster hunting group


RS07: mb nb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many actual, true rangers/mages are there though? Hardly any... By true I mean only have Ranging/mage + defence on a main account.

 

 

 

Well you have to have some attk and str lvls to quicken the def training :roll:

 

 

 

I dont agree with the 70 def requirment being crazy but i do agree that karils was a big dissappointment... since its the same range bonus as black dhide. Ahrims is better than infinity tho and torag, guthans, dharok, and verac are all better than dragon. I guess after rangers had their period of dominance jagex decided to bring them back down

sigbv9.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.