darkmage099 Posted February 12, 2007 Share Posted February 12, 2007 Either a Mascot or a golf player. Golfers get like 900bil* a year. *not an exaggerationOnly if you win ;) Oh, I'll win alright. Don't doubt my golfing skills. They are pretty 1337 8-) Really cool golfing story: There's this kid on my hockey team, and his dad is Stewart Cink! He's like the 5th best golfer in the world Trix.--quit WoW as of 12/07Thank you 4be2jue for the wonderful sig and avatar! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy500fan Posted February 12, 2007 Share Posted February 12, 2007 Anyone said Pope yet? Dibs on Pope. Dibs on being the popemobile driver! I'd tap you on the head with a blunt objected thus rendering you unconscious, and then I'd hijack the popemobile with the pope still in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obsessive_Passion Posted February 12, 2007 Share Posted February 12, 2007 You may or may not find the word morally offensive, but you seem to hold the view that males only [this is from my perception of your posts] enjoy watching or being in it. This isn't true, there is a fair amount of the female population there that also enjoys watching it. I think your comment that "this is geared towards everyone" is applicable also in this context, although not in the original manner you applied it. A forum is for the discussion of topics, why shouldn't **** be discussed, so long as no one attempts to impose their view onto yours? In essence, what I'm trying to say is that I doubt the discussion of said topic would truly affect you in such a manner that you couldn't ignore it. Personally, I find **** fine, as the females and males who act in them have consented to and even getting paid for what they're doing. If they want to do it, and people want to buy it, then I see no confliction there. The same principle applies - there is talk of the topic, but I think it is obvious that the views held are not being imposed upon anyone, and thus not an issue. If we were to try to cater for every minority group [as you've suggested yourself as being] and their beliefs, well, ineffectuality and chaos would reign. I added it as a figure of speech - to prevent others from thinking I was flaming a particular person. Hopefully, I made it clear enough to see I was attacking the attitude, not the person. Or is that considered flaming, too? Rargh. This is how I interpreted the line of posts: you only live once --> why not try pr0n? From a Romantic's POV, I'm a product of my environment, one which is highly critical of others' occupations and reputation. The problem isn't the issue; it was someone's attitude to the issue. Yes, of course, it was light-hearted, joking around. But that was only clarified after I posted. My first reply was aimed at the first post. Yet, misterpretation upon misterpretation has led to a discussion based on the morality of the act? This is not what I intended, may I stress wholeheartedly. I reacted to the attitude conveyed - the use of language, sentences structures. Being an extension 2 English and also a French Extension student has trained me to be highly critical of techniques and their effects on twisting intended meaning and consequential interpretation. I simply misinterpreted too far. It conveyed to me a sense of nonchalance: that everyone does it, hence, why not me, too? Indeed! It's just as acceptable as picking up a bottle of mineral water and drinking from it. We are dealing with words. Typed letters on a screen. We cannot read one's tone of voice, one's intention. Pardon me, and I apologise a thousand times, for having started this snowball of misinterpretation, for that's all this seems to be. EDIT: To clarify, somehow, it went from my reaction towards an attitude, to a suggestion of how one can live their life (a viable suggestion, may I add) to the morality of pr0n? I seem to have to increasingly defend the true intended meaning behind my words due to recurring misinterpretation. I feel victimised, yet that, too, is simply a misinterpretation, surely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forsaken Posted February 13, 2007 Share Posted February 13, 2007 You may or may not find the word morally offensive, but you seem to hold the view that males only [this is from my perception of your posts] enjoy watching or being in it. This isn't true, there is a fair amount of the female population there that also enjoys watching it. I think your comment that "this is geared towards everyone" is applicable also in this context, although not in the original manner you applied it. A forum is for the discussion of topics, why shouldn't **** be discussed, so long as no one attempts to impose their view onto yours? In essence, what I'm trying to say is that I doubt the discussion of said topic would truly affect you in such a manner that you couldn't ignore it. Personally, I find **** fine, as the females and males who act in them have consented to and even getting paid for what they're doing. If they want to do it, and people want to buy it, then I see no confliction there. The same principle applies - there is talk of the topic, but I think it is obvious that the views held are not being imposed upon anyone, and thus not an issue. If we were to try to cater for every minority group [as you've suggested yourself as being] and their beliefs, well, ineffectuality and chaos would reign. I added it as a figure of speech - to prevent others from thinking I was flaming a particular person. Hopefully, I made it clear enough to see I was attacking the attitude, not the person. Or is that considered flaming, too? Rargh. This is how I interpreted the line of posts: you only live once --> why not try pr0n? From a Romantic's POV, I'm a product of my environment, one which is highly critical of others' occupations and reputation. The problem isn't the issue; it was someone's attitude to the issue. Yes, of course, it was light-hearted, joking around. But that was only clarified after I posted. My first reply was aimed at the first post. Yet, misterpretation upon misterpretation has led to a discussion based on the morality of the act? This is not what I intended, may I stress wholeheartedly. I reacted to the attitude conveyed - the use of language, sentences structures. Being an extension 2 English and also a French Extension student has trained me to be highly critical of techniques and their effects on twisting intended meaning and consequential interpretation. I simply misinterpreted too far. It conveyed to me a sense of nonchalance: that everyone does it, hence, why not me, too? Indeed! It's just as acceptable as picking up a bottle of mineral water and drinking from it. We are dealing with words. Typed letters on a screen. We cannot read one's tone of voice, one's intention. Pardon me, and I apologise a thousand times, for having started this snowball of misinterpretation, for that's all this seems to be. EDIT: To clarify, somehow, it went from my reaction towards an attitude, to a suggestion of how one can live their life (a viable suggestion, may I add) to the morality of pr0n? I seem to have to increasingly defend the true intended meaning behind my words due to recurring misinterpretation. I feel victimised, yet that, too, is simply a misinterpretation, surely? Haha, I do believe it was mostly misinterpretation. Having been a victim of English subject and its tendency to stray into pointless profundity, I can understand where you're coming from. For the record, I don't find anything wrong with what you've said, as everyone is entitled to their own opinions - as my former post mentioned - so I'll just leave it at that. [: . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keep_It_Real Posted February 13, 2007 Share Posted February 13, 2007 professional billionaire How did you know what I wanted to be. But honestly, I want to be rich, and them I'm going to spend i in Sudan and Uganda. : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedepressedsquirrel Posted February 13, 2007 Share Posted February 13, 2007 Anyone said Pope yet? Dibs on Pope. Dibs on being the popemobile driver! Dibs on being teh pope sniper! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash6110 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 1. Bassist 2. Fighter Pilot (Hey its possible, I just got accepted to the air force academy) 3. Video games box art/advertising 4. Editor in Cheif of gaming magazine http://www.draynor.net/code/bar/Noobin\Please join my very new up and coming forumshttp://s3.freepowerboards.com/runeboards Feel free to AIM or MSNM me anytime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myridden Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 I'd be a scientist "I am free of all prejudices. I hate every one equally." -W. C. Fields Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenslime89 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Professional photographer would be my dream job, but for a realistic job, perhaps working in a camera shop or a dentist if I can work hard enough. Photos! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celt23 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Anyone said Pope yet? Dibs on Pope. Dibs on being the popemobile driver! Dibs on being teh pope sniper! That's not fair! I've always wanted to drive the popemobile! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGBR Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 If you were guaranteed to make money off of it? Philosopher Guitarist Writer Video Game Tester Video Game Designer The world would be a whole lot better if little green men in UFO's came down to earth to abduct rednecks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trapical Posted February 17, 2007 Share Posted February 17, 2007 Member of task force 145. Elite of the elite military unit. 30 or so agents hand picked and individually trained. The very best people individually chosen from NATO special forces. People who are now it in were chosen from the top members of... -Army̢̢̮ââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢s 1st Special Forces (Delta Force) -The Navy̢̢̮ââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢s most elite Navy SEAL Team, DEVGRU -Air Force̢̢̮ââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢s 24th Special Tactics Squadron -British paratroopers from the Special Forces Support Group -British Special Air Service ̢̢̮ââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¢â¬ÅSabre squadron." -Members of the CIA's elite Special Activities Division paramilitary unit, So these people are essentially all James Bonds/Jack Bauers. Each is a master of building infiltration, sniping, explosives, and unstoppable at hand to hand combat. No one in the team has even been killed or even injured on the job. Now do their sort of work or be a professional soccer player or millionaire? For me, its hands down, the job with the action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Try Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 Professional poker player :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faux Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 I just thought about going into Law recently :-k :: Guess the Movie Contest Champion: pfilc23 :: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AshKaYu Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 I'd be a scientist What kind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamyj2 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 Well, Ive Always had a knack for compiter repair, i youst to have a garage in my old house and it was full of broken pcs that i was fixing, got through 20/50 before we had to move and i had to dump them -.- PLAYER QUEST: The Spoils of War Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now