Agreed. He was clearly an anti-American if he really asserted that it was his duty to kill Americans, and thus it doesn't make much sense to let him benefit from the system he is so set on destroying. Free speech isn't as free as you'd like it to be. Try calling an official a [bleep]. I think rallying up for the next terrorist strike is a bit of a problem, as this isn't just speech with the incentive of causing controversy or feelings to be hurt - it's speech organizing the mass killing of innocents. Something I'd like to see avoided. Obama might have made a legal [bleep] up, which puts him in a bad position as a president. But let's not all forget why we have attained law and order in our society in the first place, and let's not let a few muddling technicalities get in the way of fixing real world problems. Extrajudicial killing =/= irrational, unjustified killing. Judicial punishment =/= rational, justified punishment.
I think countenance is the most important feature when it comes to appearance. Simply feeling more confident makes people look more attractive. Of course that's not all there is to it, but it really is of great importance.
Today I woke up with my eyes closed after a nice relaxing dream. I decided to just doze back off since I was so damn tired and that dream was so pleasant. Literally the next second, my alarm went off. Needless to say, I took a well-deserved nap right as soon as I came home from school.
Exactly, there are oddities in just about every group who unfairly give the group as a whole a bad name. I would say, for the purpose of clarity, one of our most basic morals is not to murder. The act of killing sends off quite a different vibe. Even if vegetarians do not agree that killing animals for their useful resources is ethical, washing your hands and killing millions of microscopic lives has always been considered fine. The main question we have to ask ourselves is whether a fetus constitutes as a "human life" at that given point in time or not. Personally, I see a lot of grayness there.
>Black paper with white ink "O M G racist! The white goes on top of the black and makes you pay more attention to it!" >White paper with black ink "O M G racist! The white paper is a foundation for the black ink!" >Gray paper with grey ink "O M G racist! I can't read it at all, so it must be a transcript of Mein Kampf!" > No paper or ink "O M G racist! Are you implying that [speaker's ethnicity] are all illiterate?!?" From what I've gathered on this planet, those who find any trivial little detail to blow out of proportion and label as "racist" are really the most racist ones themselves.
I love coming home from school to a great lunch. I had a pepperoni, salami, ham, turkey, and Swiss sandwich with potato chips and a hot green pepper on the side.
In my opinion, BF fixes all the things CoD just couldn't get right. (Hit detection, avatar movement, spawning, knifing, kill-streaks, pistol usefulness, and levels.) The only thing I preferred in CoD was the loadout system, but BF has something similar.
Why? If they're the type that thinks they know everything knowable, I don't blame you. (Off topic: Is the "type" in that sentence supposed to be plural or singular?)
I'll give some examples of what I meant: 1.) When a theist insists that you are blind if you don't believe that the questionable evidence provided for you is sufficient to believe a god. 2.) When an atheist draws questionable parallels, such as FSM and Santa, as a way of saying, "If you don't believe in Stupid-Ridiculous-Thing-Off-the-Top-of-My-Head-X, then you shouldn't believe god either". Basically, when someone is being an unreasonable douche just to get a jab at anyone who is not accepting of their illogical means for discerning the truth annoys the hell out of me. Being a(n) theist/atheist, having thought-provoking conversation with others of different belief systems, and being understanding of those who choose to remain skeptical is completely fine. Too bad that line almost always gets crossed.