Bubsa

Well, the first thing we'll need to know is what's putting you under this pressure.

People don't always have a lot of patience for those who can't provide for themselves.

Not really that funny for me, because he's being comedic through sense of purely being offensive, which isn't enough. He isn't offending by finding the truth or traits of things, just being deliberately provocative. Poor effort. People on this forum could do better.

Because FM actually requires you to put input in as a manager, unlike previous versions where you find a tactic and win everygame, it's infuriating? I mean, I could go ahead and break down all those points with explanation and a remedy, but that would be missing the point. My vote goes to The Lion King on the lava/volcano level on the SNES - because I always forget it until I reach the bit where the game glitched and you cannot progress past it. Every smegging time.

^ I'm going to have to agree. The point of having the tatts seems so diluted as it's so cliche. Could you also explain what 'Fear is nothing' actually means? It doesn't make sense.

Your opinions have value now.. not. ~Bubsa~

Fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit.

Smeg, no wonder it won.

It can be argued that the bombs resulted in more lives being saved over many more moths or years of combat. However, you can never justify the loss of innocent life. Justifying a war is a thankless task.

What was it up against? Can't say I'm surprised, it's a classic :)

Too tough for your own good.

What a stupid thing to say here. Why's that, fish murderer?

\

I'm going to have to agree. But seriously, get over it.

Because it's the team that gets him out there, does his strategy and makes his success possible, with input from the driver, of course. But I think it's pretty obvious that a team with a functioning relationship would succeed more often than not than a team without. No, I'm sorry. Hamilton is talking about his team mate as though he is Alonso's superior. I find that attitude, especially considering Hamilton is in his first year in F1 racing, to be frankly inappropriate. If he has feelings about the way Alonso is behaving, then he raises that with his team, not the international press. Second to that, from the way I look at things McLaren have treated Alonso second-rate to Hamilton. Alonso at the end of the day isn't there to win a Championship for McLaren, he's there to try and be the best F1 driver in the world. And then Hamilton complains when he tries to do exactly that by closing him off in the opening lap? What makes Hamilton think he has a right to go past Alonso anyway? I just find something about Hamilton that just makes me wanna cringe. His attitude has smelled of something in the past few weeks. That's completely a matter of opinion, in regards to Hamilton's attitude. I'd also have to add that the general consensus thinks the opposite of it. This may be due to media bias, but while Hamilton has held racing etiquette and Alonso did anything but during his racing at Spa this weekend, I'd say that's a pretty accurate testimony. In McLaren's treatment of Alonso as 'second-rate' - that's near on impossible. If you don't know how a racing team works, particularly one without a clear lead driver (like Schumi was with Ferrari), the garage is basically split into 2. Alonso will have people working for him and Hamilton his own troops. The only people the 2 sides will both digress to his Ron Dennis and the Chief Engineer - who will only inform the other side should they deem it necessary. Hence, why Hamilton had no involvement in obtaining the data from the engineer. I'd say if Alonso and De La Rosa are privvy to such valuable information from the 2nd most important man in the team, and Hamilton is not, I wouldn't say Alonso is suffering 'second-rate' treatment. Not to mention the gastronomical difference in wages - appropiate though given their levels of success and experience in the sport. McLaren have never been a team to have a first or second driver and this is obvious through history. Look at Hakkinenn/Coulthard, Raikkonen/Montoya and, of course, Senna/Prost. Alonso, when signing for McLaren most have known this and agreed to it, especially considering at the time of signing, he wouldn't know his driving partner (which could have well been JPM had it not been for his defection). Quote: "The Spaniard, 26, is perceived to have tried to blackmail team boss Ron Dennis at the Hungarian Grand Prix last month. In the course of a heated row with Dennis over, among other things, his desire to have number one status over Hamilton, Alonso threatened to hand over e-mails incriminating his own team to Formula One's governing body, the FIA." Now, what was that exactly about second-rate behaviour? Again, this is a miscued fact. Hamilton wasn't complaining about Alonso's right to defend - he couldn't after doing the same thing in Hungary, which incidentally put the relationship in the melting pot. Rather, Hamilton was complaining about the manner of which Alonso defended, which was reckless, petulant and most importantly dangerous. One of the most important rules of racing is that the leading car always gives a car's length and/or width to the other driver to ensure their safety. It's blatantly apparent that Alonso did not, running Hamilton off the track. Any driver would complain about this manouvre, and it now seems Alonso is resorting to the tactics that tarnished Schumacher's career. Incidentally, Hamilton respected that rule in the next corner, the legendary Eau Rouge: "At Eau Rouge it's impossible to take two Formula One cars through there without taking each other out, so I just lifted," said Hamilton. "Eau Rouge is always going to be a tricky one. He had the momentum on me and was a bit quicker." I wouldn't say anyone is whiter than white in this team's season, but consdering his teammate is pulling out all the stops to try and take the title, on the track, in the mind and through the courts, I'd say Hamilton is remaining remarkably cool and amicable for a driver so young.

That's the only part that makes me doubt it's entirely her fault - mind you, any mother who lets their child grow up thinking that way could be to blame I guess.

Lolhumans aren't the same. They fun part comes from a cat doing the actions.

Aw, this game is lovely ^-^ Really relaxing, fluffy, cute. 'Bout time I had a girly moment.

Sheesh, talk about a [bleep]. What the hell were the sons thinking, though? I mean, alcohol isn't a be all and end all defence.

I always got hungry when I watched Fievel goes West. I think it was the Cat on the train.

Why is it disturbing?

Because it's the team that gets him out there, does his strategy and makes his success possible, with input from the driver, of course. But I think it's pretty obvious that a team with a functioning relationship would succeed more often than not than a team without.

His style can probably be summed up after finishing runner up to Richard Burns in the RWC one year. McRae was leading going into the final stage, the UK rally - which he won to pip Carlos Sainz to the title to pick up his solitary RWC triumph. Most drivers in McRae's decision could have easily gone conservative to try and secure the win - but McRae stuck to the only driving style he knew, showing his respect to Burns' talents and the legions of fans he had. Pushing as hard as he could, McRae retired and finished 2nd in the championship. His cavalier style endeared him to so many racing fans of all varieties.

Or her even :lol: Was it ever decided whether it was a he or she? Well, yeah. She did. By not having a johnson.

They'll probably come out with a new 'metal' after Dragon. Hell, it's not the end of the world. WoW does the same kinda thing with Tier 4,5,6 armours. Just an incentive to do the new, harder and challenging additions to the content.