Yes, they agree with the wage or salary when they are given the job but it should be a constant negotiation. I believe that if a business (or government for that matter) is failing or cannot afford to pay their employees enough, the employees' wage should go down. I'm not arguing that companies should go bankrupt paying their employees, but eliminating the right to strike takes away any and all power a worker has. Sure, employers provide employees with a wage and the means to survive, but the employees also provide the business owners with a more than comfortable life and the assurance that the business owner's company will run smoothly. It is a two-way street; each are providing the other a service. Without the ability to negotiate your wage, you are powerless in the workplace. And yes, I realize you also have the right to leave your job and that someone that is willing to accept a lower wage will likely step in, but where does it end? What will happen when the lower-wage workers decide their time and skills are worth more and decide to strike? They will be replaced with workers that will accept less still and the cycle continues. As slippery-slopish as that argument may be, I believe it to be true. That being said, I have absolutely no idea if the Canada Post workers have any weight to their strike. I'm just arguing on principle here.