Range_This11

If he says something snide back, she gets him to talk to her. If he says something nice back, she gets him to talk to her. Don't you people see how women work? :lol: Sam, if you want to move on, just ignore her. She is using her sister's Facebook account to talk to you. Think about it.

"Id love to change the world, But I don't know what to do" AND Back to back on the radio today. It was sweeeeet.

That is the best compliment you can give a woman. :lol:

I hate those wires. I have one on the bottom only and I wish it would just fall the eff out.

You see, that is where we need to define where we draw the line; We would need to define whom this person may be (there must be one person like this out of a whole 7 billion, mustnt there?) and if he truly posses qualities and would bring benefits which would merit allowing such 'cheating', in order for the greater good. Judging by the statement you made, we could formulate something similar in the likes 'If we let one person into University then we have to let all who applied in', which clearly doesn't happen, atleast here. I won't make any more replies on this since we have derailed too much lol. Acceptance to (most) Universities is based on merit. The cheating/ethical situation does not really apply.

I've been listening to a lot of Depeche Mode lately.

What if he/she actually DID turned out to make a difference? Would 1 million dollars be that costly if that politician did indeed turn out to be a man of quality? If it is okay for one politician to cheat on fundraising, then it would have to be okay for all politicians to do so and we all know that most politicians are not interested in pursuing the greater good. Cheating is dishonest and dishonesty does not belong anywhere near "the greater good".

That is a pretty big "what-if" hypothetical. I would find it far more likely that a player who cheats to gain one item will realize how easy cheating is and continue to cheat to attain other items or levels. The "greater good" argument makes sense, but apply it to the real world. If a politician stole a million dollars to fund his or her campaign because he or she really wanted to make a difference but could not be asked to do the required work necessary to raise a million dollars, would we consider that to be acceptable? Absolutely not.

I am with you on this one. I in no way would like an AI robot to do anything for me. It must be TERMINATED.

The sure-fire way is to find out her interests. That will give you a better idea of what she may like to do on a date. Something simple like going on a walk might do the trick. It is free and pretty much guaranteed to generate some conversation.

I would never reply to it, but seeing someone like Spork say that would make me laugh heartily.

Yeah, I have never watched anything on YouTube from Jagex. I rarely follow channels on YouTube anyways.

I think you should go on a few dates and let things play out before you confess your adoration for him. Telling him you are fond of him is one thing, but try not to come across as obsessed--whether you are or not. That tends to drive some guys away if it is revealed too soon. And Sam, good to hear brother. I think that should definitely help things :thumbup:

Prime example of why old school gamers are elitist to today's gamers. if you can't have it immediately, you want to cheat for it. If you have to put some brain power into it, you want to cheat for it. If it involves repetitive tasks, you want to cheat for it. There are plenty of single player games that can fulfill your childish need for instant gratification. I do not like such broad generalizations because I am sure that there are many adult players who cheat as well as many young players who do not, but I have to agree with this post. It seems to me that cheating and instant gratification are signs of impatience and that impatience is typically associated with children. I enjoy far too much the feeling of gaining a level I worked hard for; a botter who is 99 in multiple skills will never detract from that. I could really care less if some players want to bot or if Jagex made it legal. After all, almost all console and PC games have cheats. I have some friends who use cheat codes on a regular basis to unlock levels, cars, guns, etc. and that does not detract from my experience playing the game without cheat codes. Runescape, to me, is no different.

I agree 100% with this post.

If there was organization and demand, this could be done the same way as the 75 Albums You Should Own was.

This is what metal should sound like. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr9x9th1qkA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01QA90IuOYY

My parents told me today I have turned into a real "blue-collar" worker. I work 7-3 M-F, cash my check on Friday, then buy a case of beer on the way home from the bank and hang out with some friends all weekend drinking. I never really noticed it but it is true I guess. I cannot wait for this summer to fly by so I can go back to school in the fall. I am sick of working, I want to learn again.

They give out the Lady Byng Trophy for a reason. Brad Richards, 2003-2004 Lady Byng Memorial Trophy recipient, classy hockey player. Doesn't get along with Pronger. Gee, I wonder why. There's shading the rules to gain respect and having the drive to do anything it takes to win, and then there's being a class-A douche on skates. Pronger fits the latter category. My favorite memory of Chris Pronger: He tries to yard-sale an injured Yzerman and gets what he deserves http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bb_fmWpcbag

If I remember correctly, Calibri is a larger font than Times New Roman. Teachers and professors are going to stick with Times New Roman as it is the most accurate for judging the length of papers.

Believe me, I don't mind a dirty player because as Gordie Howe said "If you shade the rules a bit, then you get more respect. That respect gives you more room and you can be a better hockey player." Pronger seems the type of player that is unaffected by injuring players and often seeks out dirty play instead of using it as a tool. He just strikes me as a particularly class-less hockey player.

I heard the trade news on the radio this morning. I can't express how much I hate Pronger, even all those years he played with Blues I thuoght he was a dirty player--especially when he injured Steve Yzerman. I can see why there would have been a "rift" in the locker room, he seems like a jerk. There you go Y Guy, I posted in the hockey thread :shades:

People care about fonts? I just use Times New Roman because it is default in MS Word.