Range_This11

I think he improved that reputation with Inception :P <_<

It wasn't even cool then. That was probably the least interesting thing the Joker said. Nothing about that movie was cool. People who get hard over The Dark Knight annoy me. Nolan is a hack. That was the best movie evarr :( In all seriousness, it was okay...HL's performance was quite good but other than that there was nothing special about it. Yeah, I kind of take the extreme opposite stance to balance out the mass amounts of fanboy hardness that came with it. I did not hate it and I thought Ledger's role was interesting and not typical of his style, but Christopher Nolan is still a hack. He really has a knack for making emotionless films.

It wasn't even cool then. That was probably the least interesting thing the Joker said. Nothing about that movie was cool. People who get hard over The Dark Knight annoy me. Nolan is a hack.

I want that purple stuff.

I typically do not watch television unless it is for sports events. The only shows I watch I download on my computer and the last show I watched on television was Lost, but that is obviously not airing anymore. When I am at school, we do not order television service for our apartment. I rely strictly on downloading to watch older series or series that air on HBO, ShowTime, etc.

Sure, women are attracted to outgoing guys and they do have a higher likelihood of acquiring girlfriends, but once a guy shows the complete jerk side of himself wouldn't it make sense for the woman to realize what he is like and leave? That is the part I do not understand.

RPG, I see what you are saying. Christ, it has been over four years since I had a relationship end in nearly the exact same way as Sam is describing his, and I obviously have not forgotten about that girl. I do not know if I can qualify my feelings as "caring" for her. Sure, there are still feelings there but I have not talked to her or seen her in at least two years so I am not really sure how anyone can "care" for someone in that situation. My point is that yes, there will be feelings for that person, but the difficult ones will fade with time. The best thing is to learn as much as you can about yourself from a failed relationship and move the eff on with your life. Every time you get some of those feelings back for an ex, put them out of your mind as quickly as you can or they will lead to dwelling and personal anguish. Bows-- It sounds like you two have a good physical connection. How are things beyond that? Try taking a break from the physical aspects and see if you still enjoy being with her.

It will never be fixed. Nice guys and nice girls will rarely date. It is always the jerk guys with the nice girls and the bossy mean girls with the nice guys. But yeah, it does suck.

Sex does funny things to a person's mind. It is natural that you still care, it has only been a couple weeks or so. It will fade if you let it. These things take time.

I was late to work and on the way there a truck pulling a trailer with lawn mowers on it kicked up a rock that put a small crack in my windshield. GREAT. :mad:

For a second there I thought "pens" was going to be a euphemism....

They may have been powerful twenty years earlier, but the Revolution left them without a central authority and essentially without the means to project the power they previously had on a global level. I am not saying that they were in the same situation economy-wise as Germany was, but a nation without a central government has almost no power or influence outside its borders.

Granted, though, that both countries were pretty much in shambles (for different reasons) when their respective leaders began the turnaround. I think that is what he was going for, not that Napoleon had any say in the Revolution.

To each his own. I drank when I was 15. I did not do it often as I am sure is the case with her.

What's wrong with drinking? Sheesh...

There are zero stereotypes that are accurate. Each individual's interests are different from every other person on this planet. Sure, there are people that share interests or traits, but stereotypes, no matter how harmless, are inaccurate and harmful. Instead of saying "x group of people does y", why not just say x person does y. I will never understand people that think any type of stereotype is acceptable. :mellow:

If he says something snide back, she gets him to talk to her. If he says something nice back, she gets him to talk to her. Don't you people see how women work? :lol: Sam, if you want to move on, just ignore her. She is using her sister's Facebook account to talk to you. Think about it.

"Id love to change the world, But I don't know what to do" AND Back to back on the radio today. It was sweeeeet.

That is the best compliment you can give a woman. :lol:

I hate those wires. I have one on the bottom only and I wish it would just fall the eff out.

You see, that is where we need to define where we draw the line; We would need to define whom this person may be (there must be one person like this out of a whole 7 billion, mustnt there?) and if he truly posses qualities and would bring benefits which would merit allowing such 'cheating', in order for the greater good. Judging by the statement you made, we could formulate something similar in the likes 'If we let one person into University then we have to let all who applied in', which clearly doesn't happen, atleast here. I won't make any more replies on this since we have derailed too much lol. Acceptance to (most) Universities is based on merit. The cheating/ethical situation does not really apply.

I've been listening to a lot of Depeche Mode lately.

What if he/she actually DID turned out to make a difference? Would 1 million dollars be that costly if that politician did indeed turn out to be a man of quality? If it is okay for one politician to cheat on fundraising, then it would have to be okay for all politicians to do so and we all know that most politicians are not interested in pursuing the greater good. Cheating is dishonest and dishonesty does not belong anywhere near "the greater good".

That is a pretty big "what-if" hypothetical. I would find it far more likely that a player who cheats to gain one item will realize how easy cheating is and continue to cheat to attain other items or levels. The "greater good" argument makes sense, but apply it to the real world. If a politician stole a million dollars to fund his or her campaign because he or she really wanted to make a difference but could not be asked to do the required work necessary to raise a million dollars, would we consider that to be acceptable? Absolutely not.