sees_all1

Well, we did it. Number 1 overall pick. And in other news, Bill Polian and his son Chris Polian fired. While Bill built the Colt's superbowl team, Chris stunk it up big time. Not sad to see either one go. Now if only we can get rid of Jim Caldwell and replace him with Jim Tressel. If I was Jim Irsay and I had the number 1 overall pick, I'd try to trade for 3-4 first round draft picks.

I've been using RuneTracker so far. Unfortunately I'm not a robot and can't remember to check every day. Is this going anywhere? Links to P H A T, Magebank, and Mr 9 http://runetracker.org/track-p+++h+a+t http://runetracker.org/track-magebank http://runetracker.org/track-mr+9

Interesting take, however yours is a philosophical issue which is somewhat apples and oranges when it's about legal terms. If someone is financially forced into a bad paying job they hate, using your logic couldn't you call it slave labour? I'm not saying either case is right, but with such a complex society you get a lot of grey area. That's fine, but there is more dignity in working a job than selling yourself for sex.

This. i'll remember 2011 because the few negatives were well outweighed by some great decisions, notable FT+W and the bot nuke. And still they managed to put out good, and consistent content. The bot nuke was long overdue. When a company starts policing its own rules and people think its a good update, you know there's a big problem.

This is virtuallly never the case. If a prostitute isn't forced into it by armed gangs, she's forced into it socio-economically. It's a service that people want but only those who are forced to give, by in large. If you put it that way, then a McDonald's fry-flipper is forced into it socio-economically. Let's face it, there are many people out there who have to do jobs they are not proud of, yet they do it, and do it legally. Fine, we'll call barely making a living at a fast food restaurant minimum wage, but forced sex in any circumstance is rape.

Chris Christie vs Michael Moore Wiki: http://en.wikipedia..../Chris_christie http://en.wikipedia....i/Michael_Moore POI: http://www.politico....stie_jokes.html http://sithoughts.mu...ves/028112.html Aftermath: Wall getting to the stage, both Christie and Moore had a heart attack. Christie was able to survive just long enough to have a flat bed truck get him to the hospital, Moore died before getting there. Christie ended up needing quadruple bypass surgery, but survived. Chris Christie wins, 9-6. Fight 10, Santa vs Jesus. Who will win?

Right, so the first page is and will probably always be http://services.runescape.com/m=hiscore/hiscores.ws The last page is in a link at the bottom, right now its at 32040, which takes us to the very last player in the hiscores, Magebank at 704878ish. If Magebank stays member, you can find the last person by searching for their rank.

Can we get a script to check how many users are on the hiscores every day? I think that data would be pretty interesting to look at.

http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/185659/prostitute-song

So as not to disturb this thread going down the page, I'll edit in my thoughts. Given the recent scandals with green energy, in my humble opinion this is the exact reason government should have no part in the free market. Government's job isn't to pick winners and losers, government's job is to create rules and enforce it's rules. Anywho, I could go on and on but there doesn't seem to be much interest... PM me if you'd like to debate. http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/16192 I'll add my thoughts later.

Unfortunately, legalizing, regulating and taxing something doesn't make it safe, just harder to prosecute. A good example of this is moonshine. With prostitution, you have to worry about human trafficking, pimps and sex slaves. The debate that you have framed does not truly represent what actually goes on, and is never as clean as you'd like it.

I wonder how many 5 year plans he went through...

I have a P2P account, I won't resubscribe on it. It'll go idle. Also, as it stands, I've been playing RuneScape less and less on my free account.

I expect the ACLU to challenge this law at the Supreme Court. Anyhow, I blame the Republicans in Congress for passing such a steaming pile, and Obama for demanding it. Hopefully Harry Reid throws a hissy-fit and buries it in committee. Or maybe Rand Paul will step up and filibuster it.

How about you write an article about something different? We would love to have a different perspective.

I think that's slightly disingenuous of you. You can't possibly have any understanding of this issue without acknowledging that those who want guns banned aren't doing so necessarily as a knee-jerk reaction. There are many people who would have them banned anyway for other reasons; this only highlights those reasons, but it isn't the reason itself. Doesn't matter what their motive is, and it probably isn't knee-jerk. Bringing forth your argument publicly, and immediately following a tragedy to gain support or get a new law rushed through is exactly the opposite of what should happen.

It wouldn't be a rational argument if we used that particular incident as a reason that guns must be banned. But nobody thus far has done that. It just brings up the topic again. It's the same as arguing against nuclear power after Fukushima. The accident itself shouldn't be the argument - but it brings up the topic again. I disagree. Specifically because people are arguing in this thread, and not in a different one. Or because the argument to ban guns only occurs immediately after a tragedy like this occurs. Also as far as nuclear power - once again bringing the debate up immediately following the worst of events is riding people's emotions. Look at how AWFUL and CATASTROPHIC this event was, we need to BAN nuclear power so something like this NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN. Average people are less likely to think logically about an event and let it take over their emotions, like a mob mentality.

Tragedy involving a firearm occurs, "We must BAN GUNS!" Are you even trying to make a rational argument anymore?

Well, that would be your problem. Try replacing the line: private static String[] elements; With this : private static String[] elements = {"Honesty","Kindness","Laughter","Generosity","Loyalty","Magic"}; //Remember to initialize this array to something before trying to access it. Princess Luna is the best Pony. Honestly do not use this code in the final version of this program, from wyvren2000 The array is 103 inputs and they are supposed to be read from a file that I have. The file is an excel chart with every element in the periodic table that looks like this: | Name | Atomic Number | Atomic Weight | Symbol | 1| | | | | 2| | | | | 3| | | | | 4| | | | | etc. all the way down to 103. I have another question (yeah, I'm pretty bad at this) I am trying to set up a method that is used like this: mol.displayAtomicMakeUp(); I have initialized mol in the main and I'm trying to get the displayAtomicMakeUp() method to read in what mol actually is. It might sound a bit strange, but I'm not sure how to word it. If it was displayAtomicMakeUp(mol) it would make more sense to me, as I know how to actually take what mol (a string) is from that but what do I do for mol.displayAtomicMakeUp()? mol.displayAtomicMakeUp() should be defined in mol, or whatever type of class mol is. Sounds like its similar to a toString() method. You can write the method the same way as if you had it in a different class, except you can access all its elements without having to use get() methods. Hope that makes a bit more sense.

Unfortunately you can't test this with a placebo...

How many F2P worlds did you login to during that time? During that time, seeing a real person on F2P not at the GE/dungeoneering was a rare sight.

Or new sunspot activity triggers a new equilibrium temperature. I wouldn't care to try to explain the data, but what I do know is that the sun's activity is not on earth, unlike both temperature and greenhouse gases, which means that if any link exists its the sun causing stuff on earth, not stuff on earth causing the sun.