Jump to content

obfuscator

Members
  • Posts

    20310
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96

Everything posted by obfuscator

  1. P2p wars certainly do occur, although the majority of them don't happen here. That isn't to say they aren't posted at all, I can think of a few examples right now. http://forum.tip.it/topic/246588-rdk-v-brut-single-spells-3hr-pkri/ http://forum.tip.it/topic/246676-damage-inc-vs-rot-p2p-multi/
  2. There is always Illusion[/endrecruitmentmode] I'm sure theres a clan out there that you'd enjoy ;p If I shared that opinion, I'd have joined already ;)
  3. Nice win :P I remember you guys from my time in PKM.
  4. I'm staying retired, sorry. Plus neither TT or Exodus really appeals to me :P
  5. I remember I hated piano lessons at the time, but certainly am grateful now. And St. John's ambulance was completely useless.
  6. Lol. Every scientific organization in the world agrees that global warming exists and is attributed to human factors (or they are non-committal, NONE have dissented). Not actually. There are many scientists who disagree, but scientific journals won't publish their papers. Global warming is a "popular belief", one that, when strayed from, isn't taken well.
  7. Congrats on making it to the gallery, best picture there by far.
  8. Best case scenario: Water on the moon. Worst case scenario: Another hole in the moon and several million dollars wasted. But yes, as Nick said I can't see the moon being knocked out of orbit. And I'm sure NASA has thought this through. I don't see how this is going to work if the impact is going to be weak compared to what the Moon has taken so far. Aren't they trying to get inside the Moon? They'll need a large collision to do that. I guess it's a very small, centered collision. It should be designed to bore straight through in a long narrow hole, and the other one will improve the original hole. I admit I can't see this working, unless the moon is actually hollow (and I haven't seen any evidence that supports that theory).
  9. I'm happy for him, and certainly glad of some of the things he's done to help make the world a better place. However, the prematurity of this award is ridiculous. He hadn't even held office for a month at the time of the nominations, and the only thing he had done by then was announce the plan to close Guantanamo. I'd much prefer if he received this post presidency, after he'd actually done something noteworthy.
  10. I really think we should stick to something similar to what we had on the old forum - basically matching the site. I'd really like to see a lot of blue :P And I love how deflection is "so 2006" XD
  11. But how they are dealt with can and will be different. A bad member on RSC can be a good member elsewhere.
  12. Best case scenario: Water on the moon. Worst case scenario: Another hole in the moon and several million dollars wasted. But yes, as Nick said I can't see the moon being knocked out of orbit. And I'm sure NASA has thought this through.
  13. I don't see the need, there's a link to the main site right next to it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.