h3art

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lyg0viIUaFM

Alternately, doesn't want to play what they consider to be tedious aspects of the game (referring to casual bot users rather than professional Gold Farmers).

Watched this documentary, thought it was absolutely chilling - especially 36 minutes onwards. http://freedocumentaries.org/teatro.php?filmID=226&lan=en&size=big

Always need a little more racial pride. <3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnl1W66_i7M

I didn't support it then and I don't support it now, though my country still has troops deployed over there and has the second highest non NATO presence (after Australia). Iraq, however, is a very different kettle of fish.

I'm just floored by the level of details, especially in the flowers. They look so snuggly and cute - I will trade you 12 Camels? :-P

Certainly, but one justifies a pro-abortion stance by placing a higher value on present human life.

You draw the line at infanticide. Besides, I discount the utility of any future person at about 7%. :wink:

I've been reading a lot of economics papers, honestly. Currently looking at a book called The Calculus of Consent by James Buchanan.

I can think of plenty of other reasons not to be in a relationship with Woody Allen. :-) But yes, as I mentioned in immediately previous post (on another thread, no less D=) I'd have difficulty dating a heavily religious person, which is unlikely to occur anyway.

I have absolutely no problem with them and have been in several. What is of more concern to me is when the cultures and religious views clash significantly, which can make things pretty hard.

Fixed that for you, Cros. Found the first article inappropriate and unnecessary. You seem to be (poorly) attacking consumerism and materialism - being materially successful is a sign of *doing something right* and thus we model ourselves on those who are materially successful (via Gp,Skills etc). I'm just utterly amazed - I don't see how personal value judgements on real life events have any place in a gaming article. Keep it to yourself, thanks. :x @Sees Found myself agreeing, nothing more to say.

Would it be worth it to take Rapier over Gravite Bow? :-)

... a balanced selection of Gravite weaponry. And a 2h which is consistent with others. Currently it's more like graphite weaponry outside of the 2h.

Amazing levels. <3: I'm currently working on a purely FtP account after getting fed up with Jagex & refusing to give them monies. I'm in the process of Dungeoneering for pretty things, and was wondering if you'd recommend the Rapier or Longsword in terms of training?

I think he meant. Nice to hear, will be even nicer if they take actions to do so.

Disenchanted enough that I've put my money where my mouth is (or not, as it were) and cancelled my membership, for this among other reasons. I'll still attempt to enjoy the free game, primarily on foreign servers for obvious reasons.

As someone who regularly asks this question, stop being such self righteous muppets. We're asking why, not stating that you shouldn't do something. A particular player may not be aware of more efficient methods, might be slaying etc.

This would be better off in the PKing subsection. :unsure: Ultimately, it depends how much work you want to put in and quite how you want to PK. If you're willing to Dungeoneer for quite some time, Gravite 2h and such are good, but obviously this will require you to have unquested Prayer, which is bad if you plan to transition to P2P. A low level Range/2h Pker is always solid, something along the lines of: 40 Attack 65 Strength 1 Defence 1 Prayer 70 Range 60 Magic In terms of questing, everything but Blood Pact/Dragon Slayer/Restless Ghost.

Just confirmed that you do infact need both requirements. tried to purchase both Arcane Stream & Rapier and was told I needed 70 Magic and 80 Attack respectively (82 Dungeoneering).

A quick question - is it possible to purchase dungeoneering items without having the requirement to use and then bank them? E.g. Scroll of Cleansing w/o 49 Herblore or Chaotic Rapier w/o 80 Attack?

Blog is now functional, but could do with some more colour methinks. Any advice on layout is definitely appreciated. :thumbup:

Endeared's Lovable Blawg. ... is now ready for deployment! :razz:

As someone with a bunch of butterfly tattoos, I'd rather not hear such a condescending tone. Of course, they're quite wide spread as flash - but some are quite beautifully inked and designed. But hey, to each their own.

Edit: wouldn't this be more appropriate in the PKing H&A subforum? I realise that it's pretty dead, but the fact that people don't post there is one of those reasons. :unsure: Most stakes these days are armour off, so Defence is far less necessary than with boxing/mage boxing. I'd go for 80 Attack, 90~ Strength and 90 + Hitpoints with 1 Defence/Summoning/Prayer ideally. If staking in that level range you need to wary of players with lower attack using CVLS/CSH. :thumbup: Basically, if you plan to get Defence, you need 99 Strength. The advantage of not having it & staking higher levels is that although you might have a ~40% chance to win, if they 2x you'll come out ahead. As for other Chaotics, some people like a CLS for last hitting/juking with Obstacles On (the fact that you're not standing toe to toe negates the faster speed of a Rapier). Examples: - with Obstacles. - at lower levels (68 or so, I'm guessing).