Ammako

2.

Yeah, you're right, should've been "Cannonball to the knee"

SHould probably tell us stats/items you already have first.

lolgpwaste

Sounds good to me.

Even 70 ranged would be enough.

Looks like they were carrying a loaded rifle and in an instant a wizard replaced it with a bigass sword. Not to mention their legs have mysteriously been detached from their body.

lol wtf

They support microtransactions, not RWT. RWT is the act of illegally selling Jagex's intellectual property. In this case, Jagex owns the copyright to anything in the game, so they are legally allowed to sell it for real money. However, players do not, so if you sell in-game items for real money, you're illegally making money off Jagex's intellectual property, which is why it's not allowed.

Well, he already explained why he wasn't mad about it.

To be fair, it already had exp lamps + Lucky items at release.

On the contrary, I don't lose any sleep over it, nor do I obsess over other people purchasing micro transactions. It is something that I strongly disapprove of, and I have made that known in this thread, but that's it. It's rather like botting, another thing which I strongly disapprove of, but it has no immediate bearing on me. I am a relatively high-level player whose training spots are bot-free, so bots aren't a daily annoyance to me like they are to others, but I still disapprove of people using them, and I still think they have disastrous social consequences for the general RS community, particularly lower-level players. I am not "butthurt" over them, though, much like I am not "butthurt" over micro transactions. Ironically though, you seem to be struggling with the notion that there are actually people like me that simply disapprove(it isn't as if I go around rioting, or harassing micro transactors, I simply hold an opinion on their action which I have made public herein) of micro transactions, you can't seem to bear it, and insist that merely holding the opinion of disapproving of the act of micro transacting is "shoving down my opinion down other people's throat", it seems you are the one butthurt over people simply holding an opinion. Please answer my question instead of dodging it.

Your personal opinion on the matter is irrelevant;words and phrases have a specific meaning. The phrase "shoving one's opinion down someone else's throat" specifically denotes repeatedly stating your opinion(often when it is unwanted), and insisting people adopt it. I have done no such thing. Simply stating your opinion, even if it happens to be judgemental of someone else is not "shoving my opinion down other people's throats". If you need any further help with understanding basic English phrases and idioms, I'd be happy to help, I know you've been struggling with these. Refer to my statement above. Predictably, you have failed to read or perhaps understand what was said yet again. What part of "their personal decisions have social consequences" do you not understand? Would you prefer that I break down that statement, and explain the meaning of each individual word to you? Actually, yes, do it. Because right now, it just sounds to me like you're butthurt because people chose to enjoy something you strongly dislike. RS enjoyed, prior to the current regime, a proud tradition that it would never engage in micro-transactions of any kind. By partaking in and tolerating a subset of micro transactions(e.g., cosmetic gear), these players are directly and actively undermining that tradition, which as stated above, has grave consequences for the rest of us. Yes. But you know what? Those who were in charge of Jagex back then aren't there anymore. Do you know what that means? I fail to see how switching over to a strict no microtransactions policy to having microtransactions has grave consequences on everyone.

Voicing your opinion once in a thread, even if it happens to be judgemental is not tantamount to "shoving one's opinion down other people's throat". If you are going to come in and try to save the day, try actually understanding what your tired old cliches mean before using them. That way you won't make a fool out of yourself. Pr0 phr33 tip,bro! If you're going to be judging people based on whether or not they buy Runecoins, I'm going to take that as "shoving your opinion down others' throats." I already explained the social consequences of their personal choices, thus immediately making this my problem, and that of others. So in addition to not knowing what your own cliches mean, you also aren't terribly good at reading comprehension either. Not too surprising. It's supposed to be your problem that others decide to enjoy their money however they want by buying purely cosmetic items? That only detracts time and resources from real updates, and encourages Jagex to develop even more micro-transactions:including cosmetic and substantive game altering ones. Except that if IVP sees that more player buy the cosmetic microtransaction content than those that give advantages, then they'll see they can squeeze more money out of cosmetic ones. It already has happened to an extent(with the XP lamps) and Solomon's general store is simply one more step in that direction. Solomon's general store is one more step in that direction? If anything, it's a step back in the "unfair advantages" department, considering SoF had exp lamps + Lucky items from the start while Solomon's General Store has none of it. Sorry, but I haven't seen anything non-cosmetic in Solomon's General Store so far.

Stop attempting to shove your opinion down everyone's throat. If these people enjoy microtransactions, then it's not your problem. The people buy the items in Solomon's General Store. Ok. If anything, doing that is showing that people support purely cosmetic microtransactions. If Jagex does release microtransactions that provide "unfair" advantage, then sure, complain all you want. For now, this hasn't happened yet, and the players buying 100% cosmetic upgrades from Solomon's Store aren't showing support for that right now. How narrow-minded do you have to be to think that? If you pay for something, you create a demand. When a demand is created, someone will attempt to meet that demand by increasing the supply. By increasing the supply of the current demand. They're showing that they support the current 100% cosmetic things bought with microtransactions, not those that give in-game advantage. Increasing demand = increasing supply of something entirely different? I think not.

Except it doesn't apply pressure to the wound, and it can't miraculously stitch a broken blood vessel back together. So, basically, instead of the blood being outside of the body, inducing shock, you now have the blood inside the body inducing shock and also causing a haematoma. Brilliant advice. How about, if you're anywhere near a restaurant or a big public building, it's almost certainly a legal requirement on their part to have a first aid kit with a large dressing? Or 999? What you meant to say is that petroleum jelly has (some minor) wound healing properties, but it's not a substitute for basic emergency wound care. In a pinch.

I know right!

Then how has it been ruined for those who "legitly" earned it? By your logic, anyone who used ZMI or the Abyss cheated for their cape.

Stop attempting to shove your opinion down everyone's throat. If these people enjoy microtransactions, then it's not your problem. The people buy the items in Solomon's General Store. Ok. If anything, doing that is showing that people support purely cosmetic microtransactions. If Jagex does release microtransactions that provide "unfair" advantage, then sure, complain all you want. For now, this hasn't happened yet, and the players buying 100% cosmetic upgrades from Solomon's Store aren't showing support for that right now.

Attempt to destroy the bow.

TBH, the bow is a better reward.

We all know the real "reward" was having 200M in super-rare spots on SoF.

Worst place: G.E. North West, G.E. South West, G.E. South East. Best: G.E. North East.