Marco

Wow learn to spell? sorry i'm not english, no one borns knowing everything. i just hope that you can write as good as i wrote english, every other language in the world that isn't your birth language, even if english isn't it, you should understand that not everyone can spell perfect english, not even some people that english is their birth language, so if you can, answer me in portuguese, german, japanese, and so on, all perfect and then i will say sorry to you for all this that i wrote, until then think before post.. please The point is you're supposed to use english here, if I went to a forum where the native language was french and you were supposed to use it there I wouldn't get annoyed if people flamed me for my terrible french. I'm not taking his side, but if you can run your posts through an english spellchecker then you'll eliminate that kind of response, and to be fair I thought you were talking about [bleep]ing your gloves at first. It's not right to flame him for it though. Okay, he could have used a spellchecker, but the amount of time that'd take if you post frequently is just silly. The guy's got to learn English somehow. Perfection through practice. I'm sure you don't mean it when you say you'd be okay with people flaming you about your poor French, how could it possibly be your fault that you're not French? :-s Anywho, anyone know how much Agility Xp you get with the Karmanja gloves for multiple tickets? 10/100/1000.

Uhh... Um Bongo.. so I'd have the power of.. some juice.. :-s Unless it's one of the stupid majority of players who read my name.. then I guess I'd have the power of a certain Class-C (or is it B now) drug..

Hmm.. I'd swap 82 Attack with 68 Runecrafting, and... 81 Defense with 45 Farming. :

Yeah, as far as I'm aware it is true. I haven't tried it with Red Chincompas, but when I was training on Grey Chincompas I noticed I caught a lot more (like at least 25% more) per minute with someone also catching them just a few paces North of me. If I was on my own I'd see about 3/4 Chincompas would spread out around the area and get stuck behind trees/rocks, meaning I would only really catch about 2 or 3 different Chincompas over and over again.

I, for one, am seriously looking foreward to the May updates, I love Lunar Magic and my favourite quest in the whole game is - and probably always will be - Lunar Diplomacy. The new upcoming Achievement Diaries sound amazing, adding strange and random (ish) cheecklists for each area to earn rewards like "teleports, better shop prices and incread Agility rewards in the Brimhaven Agility Arena." does honestly sound like fun. Hopefully players with, say 80+ Agility wont complain about Jagex making Agility easier for lower levels. How? I'm thinking if Jagex create a reward like more Xp points in the Arena, the task to earn that reward on Karmanja will be extreamly tough. And then there's the graphical updates! Finally, an update to the poor shady south side and the rich shiny north side of Varrock, as well as "arguably the best looking graphics in the game" for the Kalphite Queen, Scorpions and Spiders. :

Do you mean the 'hide' stuff? What do you want it to do? *runs up... takes a low drive to the bottom left...*

So why do you even care if sex is censored? You think someone should die because they want to censor it? YOU should die. Not literally die you know.. And I used the word sex as an example of the stupidity of the censor, although the word sex has come up countless times and it's flipping annoying not being able to say it.. -.-

At first I thought their goal with the censor was to preserve a mature and adult community. Keeping the immature childish remarks out. Now with the teachers, noobs, "dumbing" down the game and such I'm starting to think their goals have changed Damn.. I typo'd 'stupid' to 'stupod'... That's annoying.. wont edit it though :lol: Anyway, I think they've completly lost sight of any goal with the censor, and are banning words as soon as anyone becomes offended by them in the hope to keep a member.. You can't even say 'Damn' Damnit! How can I vent my frustration properly with the substitute word 'nuts'...

Clay tablets infused with a teleportation spell. With one click you get teleported by the spell on the tablet. Made using the Construction skill with a Study room in your House. Use the Help & Advice forum too.

I've always thought whoever does the censor at Jagex should be hanged.. The word 'Sex' is censored! How damn stupod, Runescape is 13+, and if you find reproduction offensive then you should be shot. Yes, we all know how it could be used to make something offensive, but so can almost any word in the English language, grow up Jagex..

Well it's definatly not anywhere near the hardest cape to get, but personally a Quest Cape beats any Cooking/Fletching Cape hands down.

Druminator did! :lol:

Hey! You snuck your Hunter level up quietly! Just a few levels below mine : We should go Hunting some time, although... it's quite a hard skill to train with another person.. What position do you play in football by the by? :-s I'm an attacking midfielder :D (long shots ftw!)

My new laptop came with Vista, no problems with it in any way so far. Translucency ftw! :

You've got to be kidding... Okay, you know the shortcut to open a new window in your browser (which is also usually Ctrl+T anyway). Not everyone has your browser, and the majority of the people who will already know the shortcuct. You're new to the board, so remember; General P2P is for discussions around Runescape only.

Hmm.. came out with 1 784 235xp for Hitpoint, when my actual Hitpoints Xp is..... 2 541 329xp... That's pretty damn far off, yet, I've never used Pest Control, and infact got to 100 Combat in my F2p days.. :-s

Thank you.

a. It wouldn't be completly outlawed. If you're legally entitled to a gun, you would have one (the police for example, but to be honest I can't really think of any other groups that should in any way have such a weapon apart from Farmers for dealing with animals). But I don't really get your point here, are you saying the murderers who want to go shoot someone would complain... and that's a bad thing? b. If you're innocent you've got nothing to fear. I'm also only using the example of a police state to be used with gun offences, so it's not like the punishment for robbery would be any harsher. c. If it were a law then of course other laws would change with it. For example if there really was a crackdown on carrying guns then the ol' stop & search laws would certainly be loosened. As I've said before, if you never carry a gun then you wouldn't mind being Stopped & Searched in the street as long as you knew that no one was ever able to unlawfully carry a gun again. d. Well there's simply no need to ever carry a gun unlawfully, so why does the punishment matter? Just don't do it, you don't need to posses something specifically designed to take someone's life. e. Maybe that's the problem. I'm glad you're a nice person to debate with. :P Hunting - Lawful. As it is now for farmers to carry guns without prosecution. Hunting of course wouldn't ever happen in an urban area, so it's not like anyone could use it as an excuse. Licences and proper training would be needed to hunt, just like it is now. The punishment doesn't fit the crime? How does that make any difference? You shouldn't ever be carrying one! Don't do it or you'll die, you have no need to ever carry one man.. It's a weapon made to kill. "America is supposed to be built on freedom and fairness." And look where it got them.. Some freedoms should never be given, like allowing people to carry around grenades, in case you need to defend yourself from a group of 3-8 people.

Could you tell me why it would be so atrocious to be killed if you carry a gun? If absolutely no one was allowed to carry a gun, then there would be no need for anyone else to carry one. Yes, people would still find and use the many other ways of killing a person, but why make it easy for them and legalise one of those methods (guns). Anyway, I just want to know your reasoning for why it would be so horrible. :)

Okay, let's use Victor's example from below. If the punishment for using a gun to kill someone was death, d'you think it'd have no effect? How about we take it another step and lets say the punishment for unlawfully owning a gun was death too. Just like a damn police state, if you get caught possesing a gun you get death, there would be no 'Oh! But he's innocent!' crap, because there are very very few reasons for anyone to ever actually carry a gun without malice aforethought. Would there or would there not be a huge reduction in gun crime? America is so addicted to its gun culture that it will simply never change.

Yeah, only in case of foreign invasion so that the citizens can defend themselves and form a militia...that clause is outdated and the only reason it still exists is because of gun companies and the NRA bribing congressmen. I don't think that amendment is right in any way by the by. I personally think the whole 'banning guns will do nothing' argument is ridiculous, you yourself have shown that people cannot bring in Switzerland into the debate because the people with guns actually know how to use them there. What exactly is the punishment in America for shooting someone causing GBH or death? I know here in England the punishments for certian crimes are amazingly leniant. Life imprisonment here is on average 15 years.

There is a HUGE difference between a semi-auto pistol and a full auto rifle. A semi-auto pistol means that every time you pull the trigger a shot is fired; there is no need to [rooster] it back for each shot. A full auto rifle means you can hold down the trigger and unleash hell very quickly. Also, rifles have much better aim...you can mount a scope and they are made for engaging multiple targets and targets at medium range. Furthermore, a rifle's clip and be modified to hold over 100 rounds (typically about 90), whereas a pistol usually holds between 7 and 19 shots. A rifle is much, much more deadly. The law is not stupid, trust me. Does the Second Amendment not allow the American citizen the right to bear arms? What I'm trying to say is why does it matter how deadly each gun is? Are they not all made for the same princliple, that is to kill someone? If you really want to get into the specifics of each type of gun then why are Assualt Rifles not allowed if, like you say, they have a "much better aim". Isn't it better to have a rifle that will hit your target rather than a clumsy pistol? Also what difference does the bigger clip size make in this debate? If you're going to kill one, maybe two people for your own "self-defence" then why does the legal pistol hold up to 19 shots? Will you really miss 18 times and have time to get off your nineteenth shot? The law is stupid, why have all these school shootings occured if the law worked as it should?

No...the guy had a semi-auto 9mm pistol and a semi-auto .22 pistol. Dual 9mm's actually.... Does it really matter? Well the Assualt Rifle is illegal, and the 9mm isn't. It makes a huge difference. Apparenly it's okay to carry one kind of gun, but not others. If one of them was semi-automatic then why is it that a fully automatic gun (assualt rifle) isn't allowed? Another example of the complete and utter stupidty of America's laws. -.- Idiot nation.. By the by, has anyone seen the film 'Idiocracy'?

That was your school?! Wow... first Epididymitis and now this. :shock: I heard about this like 10 minutes ago on BBC Radio 5 Live, were you in school at the time?

As with 'Tripsis the night owl' and 'Hellbellz the womanizer' I embrace an absence of light, not complete darkness, but not far off that is fine with me. : :D