Bladewing

This is why i dont understand when people say" they can bot all they want, it doesnt effect me" If you play team activities, the bots on the pc boat arent going to play according to how the game is going along, they just do what they are programmed for and that results in a loss. the only team activities i do are dungeoneering (in which i have never met a bot) and castlewars (if there are bots at all they don't really interfere). the bots only affect me indirectly through market interference. which really isn't even a negative effect for a player who makes most his money from solo monsterhunting and merchanting. edit: forgot about snipe bots, but i don't snipe anyway.

rock cake still work?

fire cape prayer bonus is unimportant as long as you can bring enough ppots to do a whole task without banking. since you have high combat stats and gear, and have turmoil (which drains more slowly than piety), you will be able to carry enough ppots to any task even with 9 prayer bonus (fury, fire cape, bandos chestplate and tassets). oh and 4 strength and 1 attack is superior to 6 attack on every melee-able monster in runescape.

no need, we know it's ranged based.

lol nice herb level :roll:

okay, so basically this topic is: "i don't use money in f2p, just a PSA so you guys all know this"

people contemplating suicide can be net producers to society.

bots don't have an unfair advantage. they have less fun than humans do.

your argument: money is useless in F2P others' response: why not? X, Y, and Z are all fun and cost money your counterargument: no they are not you have basically said that any and every F2P action that costs money is not fun.

obviously OP is offended by one or more of these, else this topic wouldn't exist

Based on what friends have told me, wouldn't the CLS be better in any PvP situation? my friends told me law staff is the best. because they say it is best does not make it so.

your argument suggests that f2p is not fun

no that does not work. if you have no free spaces you cannot loot a nest.

soloing bandos is a bad idea. team bandos is an even worse idea. try tds.

summoning is one of the best skills for monster hunting and is much more affordable than prayer or herblore. go get 88, and when you have money for it go get 96.

1. we don't need to counter inflation - price levels are falling (deflation) 2. here are two ideas when you kill someone, you get everything they are wearing except the one item they may protect (as in old wildy back we pay we say w66 fally riot)when someone dies, all of their items are put into a "lottery". when you kill someone, the value of your loot is determined as usual (like in the current system if you get an ancient stat that's a determined 5mil drop), but the loot is selected at random from the lottery of drops. this guarantees that the distribution of items lost is equivalent to the distribution of items gained, but prevents the kind of direct transfers that the first solution allows which the runescape community is so irrationally against.

Consider the blessed spirit shield unless the +5 str bonus is that vital. BSS has less ranged defence and costs 10x as much as the obsidian shield.

my playing RS is what keeps me at TIF, not vice versa.

you obviously misread or completely ignored my post. i suggest you go read it. edit: you are implying that my post is an opinion. it is not. take a brief read about the CPI, then you'll actually have some education in economics so you might have a clue what you are talking about.

That's nonsense, of course there's a difference. As aforementioned, I'll take an example of a painting. Lets say it was worth $3000 in 1800. But now, it's worth $3,000,000. Does that accurately measure inflation? Did prices of all commodities 300,000%? No. Of course you could argue that that's only a specific example but the logic still stands. There's a difference between price rise and money devaluation.

if you are at dks then defence is an issue. if you lack the money for a DFS then obsidian can substitute and is very cheap.

there is no practical difference between "an overall rise in price level" and "a decrease in the value (purchasing power) of money".

whip + a shield imo, you are only going to be killing supreme like 25% of the time (maybe 30% if you cannon)

because capital and money (or wealth, which is what the correct term is in the context of the titular question) have two (three) very different meanings. it doesn't make you sound smarter when you misuse the terms :thumbup:

source?