Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Tip.It Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Rebdragon

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rebdragon

  1. I personally am not a fan of the tooth fairy comparison. As I said, I prefer the hypotheticals, like the FSM or the orbiting teacup. They're not striving to make a probability comparison (as that is futile), but rather a logical point (FSM: Anyone can make up a supernatural being, teacup: cannot disprove it's existence, yet that is still not evidence for). So, to answer your question, I don't like either of those comparisons, the tooth fairy and the dinosaurs. Those are worthless comparisons, ones that merely end with the point "God exists" or "God does not". These are worthless statements, making any such comparison based solely on probabilities moot.
  2. Interesting topic. The only thing I can think of is my chronic problem of using the phrase "straight up" too much.
  3. Those are hypothetical logical comparisons. Dinosaurs kind of ain't that.
  4. turkey? I don't know you well enough to tell whether you're joking or not.
  5. Rebdragon replied to RayOxide's topic in Off-Topic
    hahaha. wait for college. no one forces you to do homework. half the time they don't even look at it. good luck surviving without it.
  6. The expansion wasn't necessary; all that was required was your statement that you were not making a joke. The point is, regardless of how much you want to argue semantics, you're equating the possiblity of God's existence with that of the dinosaurs. Some would venture to call that dumb. Most of them have scientific minds. I'm going with them on this. Note: If you're merely arguing semantics, stop, it's annoying. If you're actually trying to go somewhere with this argument, uh, please stop.
  7. And are you denying the existence of God because you haven't actually seen him...or her? If you're serious, why is someone so dumb a mod? If you're not, why is someone so unfunny a... wait, that's the way they are :lol: . [i kid I kid. Well, about the mod stereotype, not about the sheer horridness of the above joke].
  8. Hm, yes, not to stroke an ego but you do have a good face. Not as good as my beautiful Aryan one, but it's up there. God, why is Aryan blocked. Aryan. Aryan. Ugh. Ethnicity? Looks like a nice mix, but I can't place it.
  9. Jupiter, Zeus, tomato, tomato.
  10. Epic failism? Dude, the moment you just described is when you're supposed to capitalize :thumbup: .
  11. not too hard to get a 6-pack tbh. just do 10 push up every morning and every night. This is why girls shouldn't talk about muscle-building. Ya, I said it.
  12. Oh dude, that's called a change in mannerisms, not a change in personality. Not only is that fine, but Confucious advocated it greatly. One is supposed to act in the way that the situation demands him to. Ya don't talk with the emperor the same way ya talk with yer dad. But, if you consider a girl a friend, how do you act? And if you act different around a girl to get with her, do get with her, and eventually act more like your regular self, how does she react? By singing that annoying Avril Lavigne song?
  13. Ha^, I actualy wasn't thinking that but nice lil' point :lol: . I've always found that a negative quality, personally. If you're going for [kitty], you're evading the emotional in relationships and heading straight for the physical; you don't see the woman but rather only what she can give you. If you're going for a relationship, you're being detrimentally fake and deceptive. Not to say you aren't for the former. Let the ancient words ring loud, Be yourself. ... Getting [kitty]'s a skill if you can actually obtain results though.
  14. 1. I'm a "IV". Well, technically an "XIII". Bow. 2. I'm currently attending an Ivy League institution. Not Brown, that doesn't count. 3. I love John Mayer. Take that as you will. 4. I'm amazing at soccer. In the one country where it doesn't matter. 5. I don't know why I act the way I do online. Although this may seem relavitely common, my character has become that of a split personality through my experiences online; I behave almost nothing like I do in the real world, and yet talking the way I do here comes completely naturally to me. And it's the same personality everywhere- my internet personality manifests universally.
  15. A good conversation is like a tennis rally. To have no desire to be able to return a serve is... bad.
  16. Okay, list time. If you have a non-physical characteristic that isn't on this list, if you can throw an interesting twist on one of these characteristics, or if you disagree with something on the list, feel free to post. Otherwise, the repetition gets old. For the record, I obviously don't have any authority, so I guess it goes without sayin': just sayin'. Good conversationalist. Fun. Chill. Athletic (to a degree). Funny. Intellegient. Caring. Witty. Stable. Self-confident. Charismatic.
  17. Are you sad because he called you an idiot or confused as to why?
  18. And so are 49 in 50 women in real life.
  19. Intellegience wouldn't be a factor I'd add; I'd prefer she were cultured. That may come with intelligence (reading), but I find a more creative type preferable. Someone somewhat athletic, and a little different with her wardrobe (a faint hint of tomboy-esque apparel). Beyond that it's just my own physical preferences and the stereotypic ideal mate stuff, which seems to be littered all over this thread. It kind of makes me sad feeling like there's this ideal personality for guys and girls, and if you don't fit it, you're screwed. Which sucks when I think about it (ideal mates, that is), because I know I need to improve myself beyond my absurdely amazing looks.
  20. Give this man a cookie, for he is a greater man than I. And I got a cookie.
  21. Rebdragon replied to Powman3's topic in Off-Topic
    It's called "what the bleep do we know - down the rabbit hole" there is a sequel to it and if you enjoy those principles you may also like to read about eckhart tolle, wayne dyer, allan watts, "the secret", the quantum doctor, Q is for quantum physics. I've held this concept since I was about 10 years old (before I read any books - I was excited as I thought it was my idea :wall:) - vibrational frequencies that we send out etc it just makes sense to me. Want to know how I attract money? I put a $100.00 note in my pocket, walk around the mall and imagine what I can buy with that $100.00 and create the feeling of having several thousand dollars ;) and then for some reason, I always find myself in circumstances where I'm constantly receiving offers or ideas for making money. if you want a good book, PM me. Gag. Just like my mom. Every time I try and explain theoretical and/or particle physics to her, she gets all spiritual on me. For the love of God, no, neurtino's are not the elementary particles of ghosts. Christ. It's all BS girl. Escape from it :ohnoes: .
  22. meol, did you miss the whole "natural" argument..? Chickens fight each other. It's in their blood. Ever heard of the phrase "pecking order"?
  23. Damnit, I want to laugh but I'd feel like a jerk.
  24. Don't flatter yourself.
  25. :lol: Someone give this kid a medal. Greatest troll to avoid ban (well almost). He is kind of right though

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.