Hajutze

Uh, that's more like 2 dots. Not even connected in a line. No extremes and the current combat level sounds just fine. No extremes because it's not shown to the level > Rework the level > No Extremes ... It looks like a circle to me and no, it doesnt sound just fine ... wasn't the wildy supposed to be .. dangerous .. or it's supposed to be dangerous for skillers but not for pkers who don't want to skill ? Am I getting it right ?

It's like an effin circle. "They should not be able to use extremes in wildy because herblore is not part of the combat level" "Don't change the combat level it works just fine"

I'd like a whole new group/spellbook of spells that doesn't need any runes + the ability to enchant items for various effects based on magic and runecrafting levels (so rc wont be fked up with the new spellbook) but this wont happen anytime soon ... in other words - never :unsure:

I am just saying that for some reason some people are disregarding the possibility for a separate vote (I want wildy and FT, I want only FT, I want only wildy) with a strange argument. And it wouldn't hurt to know how many people want only the one without the other (it might be inefficient to implement only one of them but it's not a bad idea to have such information)

Until they keep HA as the best F2P and a decent P2P training option the statues are not the biggest problem (the current deflation is mostly because of some sort of a panic and it won't bring the old prices)

It makes sense to return free trading if you are going to re-implement old wildy. But in no possible universe it makes sense to return wildy if you are going to re-implement free trade. Why not? I'm genuinely curious, I haven't given it much thought. The old wildy is pretty much based on wealth transfer (the current PvP is based on removing wealth from the game while introducing different kind of wealth at the same time), it would be logical to reintroduce a system for free/non-limited wealth transfer when you reintroduce non-limited wealth transfer based PvP. On the other side - the non-limited wealth transfer has nothing to do with PvP. Considering that I find the current PvP being if not better at least comparable with the old system (this has nothing to do with the needed amount of danger in wildy) you'd find it more logical to introduce the old drop system with the current PvP but PvP area in every world is not a logical next step from introducing a different trade system ... In other words it's logical to add the trade system in the PvP, adding PvP in every world because of a trade system is not.

It makes sense to return free trading if you are going to re-implement old wildy. But in no possible universe it makes sense to return wildy if you are going to re-implement free trade.

What's with everyone saying this. It's possible to have free trade without old wildy.

You're doing it wrong :lol: Wut

Tanking :shock: It's funny how the glitchs are more awesome than the normal ingame animations ... lazy asses <_<

Easily fixable - time gap - the level is recalculated few minutes after you change your equipment so even if you drop everything your opponent has the time to finish you off .. easily considering your lack of equipment.

Problem with herblore is that it's validity comes only at very high levels.. someone with 80 herblore will have 80 extra "combat" levels - however he isn't any stronger than someone with "1" herblore. Now why would you start adding from level 1 ? Add X levels when they reach 88 (1 level would not be appropriate) but no combat level increase before that.

The update message didn't quite answer to the question - how many gloves can you get/use ?

Not the best example but it should be comparable to overloads/extremes - Korasi's Sword. I am fairly sure that there are a lot of single attack zones in the wilderness where korasi's sword will shine. It can be replaced by only 200k (The same principle as a potion which costs 30-40k). And I doubt they are going to ban it in wildy.

From personal experience - near the 3rd day you start to play/move/talk literally like a robot. It's fairly possible that you'll scape even better then usual (thank god that my sister just pushed me to the bed ... I couldn't get up and eventually I gave up ...)

Implication: something implied or suggested as naturally to be inferred or understood: to resent an implication of dishonesty. A smart person would naturally understand that there is a chance of a vote being rigged (if it happens rl, .. meh it's easier to do it virtually), not that the vote was rigged. It would be the other way around if in our universe everything had 100% chance to happen. But hey ... It's not always like that <_<

I clearly said that votes COULD BE manipulated very easily. Not that they were. It means that I'm saying .. that there IS a chance of manipulation (they can if they want to), not that there WAS a manipulation. Two different things.

If you are not familiar with my opinion on the case, don't spill [cabbage] on the forums. I was one of the only people AGAINST the change but supporting the reliability of the vote results. Don't make assumptions from just 1 post - it makes you look dumb (in other words, smarter than you actually are). <_<

Nope. Because I'd rather it to be the year of [bleep]ING EPIC BRAIN EXPLOSION GOD DAMN WIN quests. :thumbup: I agree. Quests>clans. tbh I dont care .. BUT Runescape is (or should be ... well at least it's classified as) a MMO game massive MULTIPLAYER online ... and the clans are multiplayer..er than quests :unsure:

That would have been awesome lol :P. But Jagex knows their players at least as good as that they knew that that would never happen ;) And they could easily manipulate the vote ... you can never be sure about the results.

Surely the second vote proves that 91% of voters did indeed want the wilderness back. Whether or not Jagex did lie about the first vote being a petition is irrelevant to the fact that the second vote shows without a doubt that over 90% of players want the old systems back. Due to various reasons you can't be sure that there are 90%+ players that want it, but this is irrelevant .. because it clearly shows that MORE people want it, which is enough.

It'd be more original if you were a sister .. but meh

I don't see the problem. Once you cross to Zaros' side you can't go back to the other part of GWD.

She/he looks like Raiel from Legacy Of Kain It looks like the child of a Naga and the Evil Chicken to me ...

it's .. totally .. worth it!