Zaaps1

Use a Berseker Necklace and an Obby Mace at Waterfiends. That allows you to train defense while still using crush. Therefore, Waterfiends would be the best option for you. It's speed is slightly worse than using a ZS or SS, but slightly better than the Godsword, and far better than stuff like T hammers, V flail, and Barrelchest Anchor. If that doesn't appeal to you, you could try Scarabites as well. Very high danger though.

Fine. You need 10 defense for black right? 1 defense OR 1 hitpoints level both equal 1/4 of a combat level. So getting 10 defense levels... That equals 2.5 combat levels. Level 10 defense is 1154 defense xp, so that equals 384 hitpoints xp. Too bad for you, that JUST gets over 11 hitpoints (by like 15 xp). However, that doesn't matter, since that takes it up to a 2.75 combat level gain. Not enough to get you level 6 combat. So you can have a level 5 with 10 defense, you'll just have to accept 11 hitpoints along with it. Beware, gaining a SINGLE level of ANY combat skill type (magic, ranged, prayer, hitpoints, defense, attack, strength, summoning, ANY of those) will get you 6 combat. EDIT: I may not have been clear, here's a summary: while you can't get defense xp w/o gaining hp xp, you CAN accomplish your overall goal. If you want a level 5 with Black (g) armor, you'll just have to train exclusively defense. You'll gain 9 defense levels and 1 hitpoints level doing so, but you will be 5 combat.

Are you in school atm? If not you have plenty of time. The Diaries are worth the time. For example, with Varrock armor 3, you are making money at a rate of 14.4m per hour, spread out over 144 days. (That is to say, all the time you spent buying battlestaves over 144 days is equal to 1 hour of total time. And in those 144 days, you profit 14.4m.) And all it requires are 3-4 hours, excluding time training, which you will probably do eventually anyway. Plus they're fun :thumbsup:

You mean STEAM runes. There's a big difference. I believe it is 45k xp per hour, but that's with the Giant pouch, which you don't have atm. Google "Mega Runecrafting Guide 4". Click on the first result. There's a more in-depth guide in there somewhere, I think on the second or third page.

You can do the tasks in any order, but you must claim all of the lower level rewards before claiming the higher leveled ones. Ex. must have easy reward to get medium.

Tasks done before completion of Smoking Kills do not count toward the 4.

Varrock and Seers should be done ASAP (free flax and the battlestaves add up quickly). Fremmy can be very useful if you do a lot of stuff in that area. Falador is extremely useful for the prayer restore, esp if you slay a lot, that should be done right after Varrock and before Seers. Lumbridge is really optional imo. The Cabbage tele is extremely useful if you farm a lot, which you should be.

You're most likely going to run into some big trouble then. I would recommend against killing Ankous, but if you really want to, then just wear your next best metal armor, or green dragonhide if it's below steel.

Duradel. Anyone over level 100 w/ 50+ slayer should go to him.

It's a few posts above you.

After your fourth task you will get points, as long as none of those tasks are from Burthope.

Could've just used a guide. 2.5k chins should be more than enough, and it's always better to take too much than to take too little.

No.

Player mods (silver crown) do not get paid. Jagex mods (gold crown) are paid by Jagex because they are Jagex employees. They work at Jagex, so it's fairly easy to mail them/give them their paycheck.

So, what are they? Like gift cards? Pretty much... http://lmgtfy.com/?q=wallie+card

Very old. AT LEAST since Fairy Tale Part 1, since he's in that quest.

This. Although you would be sacrificing 2 inventory spots and a familiar by doing so.

I'd go with the bolts too, since you can get fletching xp as well from adding the feathers.

Yew logs at 200 gp each, I don't think so. Before GE and trade limits, anything was possible.

Wouldn't it be easier to just get more lanterns, as using the box would take up a space anyway. you can drop a box w/o it hindering you later, but if you drop a lantern, you wont be going back ne time soone if it was your only one lol Then don't make it your only one?

I just dont like the way he was created. He should be a clone of Mario and Weegee should get his own set completely imo. He farts, rides a bike and looks like a loon :lol: My opinion. :? Mine as well, I think he's pretty much a "wtf" character. Kinda like G&W in melee.

if they are fully developed why are they still opening up coal burring power stations and coal mines all over the place. and why is Mcdonalds still expanding at a much faster rate than in the US. if they are developed this assumes that they are already done developing and are simply expanding with the population, witch they are not. China is still trying to catch up to it's population unlike Europe or the US. If the US is fully industrialized, why is it still trying to find new reserves of coal and oil? McDonald's isn't an industry, it's a corporation. It would be like any new store expanding in the US. It's irrelevant. Thanks for the perspective. But you must admit that neither Russia or China are Communist nations- the USSR failed and China adapted to a more free market. And you do gloss over the fact that China restricts the freedoms of its citizens far more than the classic free nations, as shown by the way they restrict internet usage, news, and family size. Furthermore, cities are not all of China. Of course they're going to look nice and free- after all, they do support tourism. Places where tourists do not go are probably far, far worse. Admittedly, you could say the exact same thing of the U.S., but the difference is the government doesn't force tourists to only visit certain places. Russia and China WERE Communist (and China, in name, still is). That's what I meant. Decades ago, they were only considered "inferior" to the West because they were Communist. Since then, both nations have released their tight Communist hold and are no longer fully Communist. That's what I mean when I say "first world" and the like are outdated terms. Restriction of freedoms has nothing to do with China's economy and industry, which is the focus. You're right in that second paragraph, but that doesn't make China less industrialized. All it means is that it is POLITICALLY more harsh, not ECONOMICALLY. There isn't a restriction to places you can visit in China, as far as I know. (Ofc, excluding off-limits places such as Nuclear Plants, etc.) Plus, the US has poor countrysides as well. There's not much difference except for the amount of people, and that is explained by China's greater population.

Double post is my bad

China is NOT a poor country. I've been there myself, and most of my family lives there. It's not the socialist/communist place you all seem to think it is. There are clearly signs of capitalism there, and there are limits to them much like the US. So China is only so much of a "poor" country as the US is. Both have poor people, which is the unfortunate and inevitable result of any form of free-market economy. Both have rich people. Both have middle classes. The difference is: since China's population is so much bigger, there are a lot more people who are poor, and a lot more people who are rich. 5% of 100 is only 5, but 5% of 10000 is 500, but it's still 5%. Half a century ago, was China impoverished? Yes it was. Back then, it was a much darker place. But since then, much of China has improved. China is not a technologically backward country, and many of you imply. Many of the things you can get in the US you can buy in China. My cousin has a blu-ray DVD player, if you desire an example, and many of my relatives enjoy the same gaming consoles we do here (although many more people use the Wii than in the US). "First world", "Second world" and "third world" are outdated terms. They were made during the COLD WAR by NATO nations. Guess who was first world? That's right, democratic nations. Guess who was second world? That's right, communist nations. Guess who was third world? Anyone who didn't side with either group. You may be lead to believe that they describe economic situations, but they don't. The reason why first worlders are so much richer than the others are because of the governments they live under. Any democratic nation would have received rich US and NATO aid, and soon would become rich itself. Communist nations generally could not rely on Communist and the USSR to do that for them. And of course, countries that received no aid at all struggled to keep up and became poor. However, many of the "second world" and "third world" nations have turned the tables. Examples are China and Russia, second worlders who are now in the same tier as "first world" nations. The better term would have been "developed nations", "developing nations" or "underdeveloped nations" (although many people do not use the last). China is not underdeveloped, as any nation with that strong a military and with nuclear capabilities cannot be underdeveloped. China is not developing. Chinese cities are very much like US cities. There are factories, malls, and mass transit. China is fully industrialized (explain the environmental problem another way?), so it cannot be developing. So if you call China "third world" or "developing nation", then you might as well called the US and Western Europe the same.