March 15, 200719 yr Jagex, jagex... When will you ever learn how to stop macroers? You apparently have "protection" against them,, yet I go on the biggest world and most unlikely place for macroers, and there are 5 little level 3 accounts hogging my yews. That is rediculous. And they have forgotten about one of the most surefire ways to stop macroers. Forums and other websites use it, why can't they. I reckon that Jagex should add in a security feature. When your not in combat and out of the wilderness, if it actually detects signs of macroers, example, constant clicking, waiting before clicking, long term cutting, it will have a little pop-up screen asking you to type in a certain security code. This would work a lot and wouldn't annoy players too much. It also means most macroers would go out of buisiness because they wouldn't be able to crack this code. So who agrees with me on this system, because at the moment I'm pissed and can't cut a yew without 5 other macroers joining in, making money for their mains, and then bragging to other people about their mask and 40 mill that they "earned". If you agree with this system, please post a reply saying so. I was thinking of building up a partition, though I was too lazy. Any help of getting this message to Jagex would be greatly appriciated.
March 15, 200719 yr You are talking about a captcha image...which was broken in RS1, and is broken on most websites. If a rotating balloon animal wont stop a macro what makes you think some text will? You make it sound like running through a few level 87 monsters is hard which it really shouldn't be at your level.
March 15, 200719 yr Author A rotating balloon is quite easy to pick with the right 3D algorithms. Anyway, it is more secure then that. Though it would have to be really easy to read and very hard for a macroer to read.
March 15, 200719 yr captcha will be broken easily. think of bots which go around auto posting advertisements in forums, theyre advanced enough to bypass captcha's, and theyre designed to have the smallest code possible.
March 15, 200719 yr Author It won't rule out all autobots, though it will rune out most of the "noobiest" ones who won't know how to create a device to crack the code.
March 15, 200719 yr Yahoo and Google use it, why not RuneScape? Text is extremely difficult for a program to read if it is not a) copiable and B) in usual form. This would be very effective. But still not foolproof.
March 15, 200719 yr I suggested this before, and it didn't go down too well. My suggestion, all the way from page 4.
March 15, 200719 yr Yahoo and Google use it, why not RuneScape? Text is extremely difficult for a program to read if it is not a) copiable and B) in usual form. This would be very effective. But still not foolproof.OK, then don't read text, just know how many interfaces will be held and detect the differences and uniquenesses to each interface :roll: :wink: ~ Clicky for the blog of No Cb Skils ~
March 15, 200719 yr This would work a lot and wouldn't annoy players too much. Bots would find a way around this and it IS irritating. Twitter ||| Google+ ||| Facebook ||| LinkedIn ||| My very interesting weblog about science
March 15, 200719 yr I think this has been suggested before... it's still a good idea, but like someone else said, they'll find a way around it eventually. It would likely just be another temporary fix.
March 16, 200719 yr Or we can make random events more likely when you perform an action that is "macro-like" ~It's Super Effective! (The Zaaps Blog)~My YouTube Channel, where you get to watch me go around and make a fool out of myself and all comp capersGuides:~Yeah I wrote them once~Suggestions:~Yeah I made those once~
March 17, 200719 yr it seems rather drastic to me..... but, i have a minor improvement for it: there could be two varying things; the text that they must type AND the way in which they must read it. there could be like 10 variations of the reading it part. it could be like "left to right", "top right to bottom left", or "bottom to top". this would make it tricker i think =p. The spelling and grammar of that email was that of an 11 year old palestinian goatboy who is speaking english for the first timeQuite simply, Facebook craps on Myspace. Then makes it eat the crap.
March 18, 200719 yr Lol, a fellow PE member on tip.it. hmm.. as they said before, they'll find a way around it. =| xTCOx Rogue
March 18, 200719 yr A potential method in which this would work is a "puzzle" of sorts. Essentially, you could make a little 5x5 word find and you have to find the word located in there. Given, the word would only be Left-Right, TopLeft-BottomRight, or Top-Bottom alignment to make it easier, but it would still be hard for a macroer system to find it since it would completely randomize where and how the word is added. So for example, say the word was 'CAT.' ARSTE EMCIR OLANW CNTWY POQAN Cat would be Row 2, Colemn 3 going down... but it could be randomized literally anywhere in the puzzle... don't worry, you are going to "hell" anyway. wanna race to see who gets there first?Officially reached 100 Combat at 1:33PM EST, June 14, 2007First Dragon Drop: Dragon Chain (Dust Devils) @ 10:48PM EST, July 14, 2008, lv113 combat
March 18, 200719 yr A potential method in which this would work is a "puzzle" of sorts. Essentially, you could make a little 5x5 word find and you have to find the word located in there. Given, the word would only be Left-Right, TopLeft-BottomRight, or Top-Bottom alignment to make it easier, but it would still be hard for a macroer system to find it since it would completely randomize where and how the word is added. So for example, say the word was 'CAT.' ARSTE EMCIR OLANW CNTWY POQAN Cat would be Row 2, Colemn 3 going down... but it could be randomized literally anywhere in the puzzle... Great idea, maybe a Rubik's cube puzzle? I'd own at that. ~It's Super Effective! (The Zaaps Blog)~My YouTube Channel, where you get to watch me go around and make a fool out of myself and all comp capersGuides:~Yeah I wrote them once~Suggestions:~Yeah I made those once~
March 18, 200719 yr the're are things called ocrs which are text recognition things you're idea sucks and it would ruin the game
March 18, 200719 yr Good idea, but deltawood has a better one. Click on my sig for a good and fun way to kill macros. [>>Thanks to Yaff2 for Reaper,Trooper,and DOOM sigs, Navyplaya for nature sigs, Hardwick246 for gold sig, ThruItAll for Darkwatch and guitar sigs, and Aijiru for avvy!<<][>>Refresh for new Siggie!<<]
March 18, 200719 yr Congratulations the 10000000th person to steal my idea (use the damn search button) Your name is "bet you fail", and you're starting a business with your mom? I'm not even going to touch that.....
March 19, 200719 yr abbyssalwhip chill lol, i made an idea once then a day later saw someone else post it, dont spam their (your) idea... its an idea to make the game better regardless of who thinks of it, so maybe help along with the idea instead of getting in a hissy about it? ontopic... i think this is a good idea, bound to annoy people but LIVE WITH IT if so many people didnt macro we wouldnt have the damn porblem in the first place would we? and over 50% of people that put an idea like this down are macroers them selvs lmao.... idiots anyway, good luck with the idea =) very much in support MMORPG - Many Men Online Role Playing Girls - LOL, but how true?Oh and none of the people you see online saying "looking for bf" are girls. Statistics I make up don't lie. - HA!Retired - 19:37 - 25th feb 2007Officially back - 19:19 - 16th april 2007Ive quit enough times to quit again and be garunteed im guna be bribed back, totally worth it ;) until next month anyway
March 21, 200719 yr Good idea, but deltawood has a better one. Click on my sig for a good and fun way to kill macros. I tried Delta's way, but the macroers are pretty advanced. After the hobs hit them a few times they ran like the devil himself was chasing 'em. It was still fun to watch, though. ^ Going for full 3rd age Ranged, no coif, with about 10m to spare. Merching ftw.^ TIF vs KWD=Tif scared
March 21, 200719 yr Jagex, jagex... When will you ever learn how to stop macroers? You apparently have "protection" against them,, yet I go on the biggest world and most unlikely place for macroers, and there are 5 little level 3 accounts hogging my yews. That is rediculous. And they have forgotten about one of the most surefire ways to stop macroers. Forums and other websites use it, why can't they. I reckon that Jagex should add in a security feature. When your not in combat and out of the wilderness, if it actually detects signs of macroers, example, constant clicking, waiting before clicking, long term cutting, it will have a little pop-up screen asking you to type in a certain security code. This would work a lot and wouldn't annoy players too much. It also means most macroers would go out of buisiness because they wouldn't be able to crack this code. So who agrees with me on this system, because at the moment I'm pissed and can't cut a yew without 5 other macroers joining in, making money for their mains, and then bragging to other people about their mask and 40 mill that they "earned". If you agree with this system, please post a reply saying so. I was thinking of building up a partition, though I was too lazy. Any help of getting this message to Jagex would be greatly appriciated. You didn't play rs1 did you. If you did you would know this has been tried similary(sleeping bags) and failed yet you think it will work now.
March 21, 200719 yr Recalling... Recalling.... RSC!! JaGeX tried this before, back in RSC. We had these 1337 things called 'Sleeping Bags' and 'Beds.' Pretty much EVERYTHING but walking used 'energy,' and you could only get 'energy' back by using a sleeping bag. You had to type in a code to get out of the bag though. Anyways, you still have them if you play RSC, but RS2 did away with them. I think people didn't like them because they were an inconvenience and you could escape fights with them. But on your suggestion, I can see the logic, but the implementation wouldn't go over well in my eyes. Largely because, people can now get through those filters, and also, regular players might get REALLY ticked. So overall, good intentions, but by looking at the past, I would have to disagree that this could be used effectively.
Create an account or sign in to comment