Jump to content

Quest Points used to decide trading gap??


sibmaster

Recommended Posts

actually, it would probably become my paradise. think - no more congestion where I cut my willows. More spots per player for training (imagine it, 100 players over perhaps 5 servers, able to become a close knit community)

 

people would sell accounts of course as well, probably. this would mean I could get a high level and suddenly do everything I want. I could get another computer, and give loads of stuff to my other account! hallelujah

 

 

 

However, RS would probably become P2P only =(

 

 

 

Even if that is your paradise, that would be many players' nightmares. :ohnoes: I find one of the greatest aspects of Runescape to be it's community. Some of my best friends now were just people who I walked up to and started talking.

1ekn0o.jpg

Thanks to Uno for the awsome sig <3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

anyone else want to comment on my method?

 

Just noticed the update on the first post, after my concerns in regard to having an overly high "P2P Max Diff. Limit"... The following emote says all I have to say in regard to it... :thumbsup: (As in, it looks totally perfect to me.)

 

 

 

~D. V. Devnull

tifuserbar-dsavi_x4.jpg and normally with a cool mind.

(Warning: This user can be VERY confusing to some people... And talks in 3rd person for the timebeing due to how insane they are... Sometimes even to themself.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone else want to comment on my method?

 

Just noticed the update on the first post, after my concerns in regard to having an overly high "P2P Max Diff. Limit"... The following emote says all I have to say in regard to it... :thumbsup: (As in, it looks totally perfect to me.)

 

 

 

~D. V. Devnull

 

 

 

 

 

No Problem D_V_Devnull, i take all comments and ideas into consideration, and if i think they are appropriate i will alter it, of course giving credit to those people who helped.

Smashing Pumpkins Fan? Check out my sticky! ~ CYB Worthy viewtopic.php?f=77&t=759663

lol123et5.jpg

sibmaster93.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's true, it'd be more fair if it was based on total levels... (maybe total xp too?) :o

Ty Veyron for Siggy help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thank you for your comment. Unfortunately though, im not going to include anything that is based on total exp, as bots and macroers can get a skill to 99 easily and therefor can get lots and lots of exp without even lifting a finger.

 

 

 

Even if it was total exp and total lvl combined it would still give bots and macroers the upperhand with the total exp.

Smashing Pumpkins Fan? Check out my sticky! ~ CYB Worthy viewtopic.php?f=77&t=759663

lol123et5.jpg

sibmaster93.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we should be able to trade on a percentage of the trade's total value

 

-support

Account created on Weds, December 21st, 2005

99 cooking on December 12th, 2010. 99 Agility on September 30th, 2011. 99 Fletching on August 17th, 2012. 99 Prayer on March 22nd, 2016. 99 Farming on April 4th, 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They did it this way because of the autoers. Autoers get tons of levels very fast, because of their nature. So, they set it for quests, because autoers don't really bother to do quests, because they're not necessary for skilling.

 

 

 

However, I think that the low trade limit is really bad. I like Bonzeben's idea was good. A percentage would be better. I sold a Guthan's spear, and I couldn't go more than 3k above/below, due to the other person's limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One problem with your idea. Levels are easy to get for autoers; whereas quests are not. If a gold website makes a bunch of accounts and gold farms with them they will get their lvls up using auto programs. Quests on the other hand have to be done by an actual person.

 

 

 

It would be nice if the limit was higher and was a mix of total lvl and quests but I think it would make it too easy for RWT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One problem with your idea. Levels are easy to get for autoers; whereas quests are not. If a gold website makes a bunch of accounts and gold farms with them they will get their lvls up using auto programs. Quests on the other hand have to be done by an actual person.

 

 

 

It would be nice if the limit was higher and was a mix of total lvl and quests but I think it would make it too easy for RWT.

 

 

 

I suppose after reading this i should raise the levels needed for f2p (not p2p because 99% of all bots ect are f2p) as they could be too low level requirements.

 

 

 

EDIT: The main post has been changed.

Smashing Pumpkins Fan? Check out my sticky! ~ CYB Worthy viewtopic.php?f=77&t=759663

lol123et5.jpg

sibmaster93.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly if you want to get your trade limit up then do quests...they really aren't that bad -.-

 

 

 

But i'll support. Idc if they use total level or quests or whatever, doesn't matter to me, but it just sounded sorta rant-ish in the first couple of paragraphs.

Range_0r.png

Anyways, BBL OFF TO SLEEP WITH A RACCOON
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.