Seraphi Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 I still don't understand what you mean "Energy amplifying".Does it just allow more energy to be directed, or does it actually multiply the amount of energy?The second one is basically impossible, so I assume its the first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Mather1 Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 I still don't understand what you mean "Energy amplifying".Does it just allow more energy to be directed, or does it actually multiply the amount of energy?The second one is basically impossible, so I assume its the first?It allows any strenght of electricity or expotion to work more efficiantly, for example a nuke able to obliviate a city would then create a crater twice as large(although nukes are not allowed here), a current of electricity strong enough to power a lamp could power a TV, although the amount and type of naquadah decides how mouch the energy would be anplyfied. Twitter: @TheMather1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VEGHATERMEATLOVER Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Hardening of cells. This would cause the organism to die. Oh, I wanted a sort of mimicry of bonesDisease spread airborn. It would spread to other people and get you in a ton of trouble (Look at Findenland, oh wait, he isn't on the map anymore...Yeah.) Lol, The bacteria will spread but they will be normal bacteria unless they're connected to the rest, they're not a disease.Hive mind. Using this with quadrillions of bacteria (The amount you would need to be even a small race) would be basically impossible I meant wireless tech so that they could be intellegant without bieng connected.Cyberkinetics (over time) If something is made of bacteria, cyberkinetics wont work I need to research nano tech and make some microchips, easy.Spaceship?? Wha? Wha?Growing of muscle tissue quickly. Too much muscle tissue = Too much energy exerted, if you plan to do this, make sure you keep that in mind. For my race to feed on.Survival in space. This would require to be able to surive extremely low temperatures, something which is very difficult to do. It'll be hard but i'll try :). I'm worrying about them bieng sucked away from each other in the vaccum of space however.some way to not require oxygen.Unless you're a machine or come up with some other method to use this, it wont work. Some bacteria don't require oxygen and I reckon with some basic genetic modification.something offensive ranged weapon No comment. :)something offensive defensive No comment. :)something offensive melee weapon used in wars. Melee..Weapons...? You really should not be using melee weapons in space. Why not? I reckon I can get about double the power using a melée weapon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seraphi Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Thats basically creating energy though, isn't it?I mean, making 20 watts of power able to run something that requires 40 watts is creating energy, and what you said is basically the same thing.If thats the case, it just wont work. You can't create/destroy energy, you can only transfer it. Hex, a gun is always more powerful than a melee weapon, due to the range. Why get close to somebody and risk getting killed when you can shoot them from far away.Microchips for bacteria? That would mean you need one microchip per bacteria. AKA. Impossible production rates. Why not just choose a 'normal' race. For all I care it could be a race of five haded squid people who feed off glass, but it would make it a damn sight easier for you to make tech that fits them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Mather1 Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Thats basically creating energy though, isn't it?I mean, making 20 watts of power able to run something that requires 40 watts is creating energy, and what you said is basically the same thing. If thats the case, it just wont work. You can't create/destroy energy, you can only transfer it.If it is more than super conducting(let's call it omegaconducting) it could use already existing heat to amplify the energy, basicly the opposite of what a conducting material does with the electricity. Twitter: @TheMather1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nero Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 My 2 Battleships are complete, and are in orbit above Earth, as well as the other one that's been sitting there for a while (the crew must be incredibly bored by now). Not much else to say, research continues on all mentioned projects, new gun line coming soon, blahblah. Vienna Raszyn Warsaw Klushino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seraphi Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Thats basically creating energy though, isn't it?I mean, making 20 watts of power able to run something that requires 40 watts is creating energy, and what you said is basically the same thing. If thats the case, it just wont work. You can't create/destroy energy, you can only transfer it.If it is more than super conducting(let's call it omegaconducting) it could use already existing heat to amplify the energy, basicly the opposite of what a conducting material does with the electricity.So, recycling(Redirecting) energy that already exists? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Mather1 Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Thats basically creating energy though, isn't it?I mean, making 20 watts of power able to run something that requires 40 watts is creating energy, and what you said is basically the same thing. If thats the case, it just wont work. You can't create/destroy energy, you can only transfer it.If it is more than super conducting(let's call it omegaconducting) it could use already existing heat to amplify the energy, basicly the opposite of what a conducting material does with the electricity.So, recycling(Redirecting) energy that already exists?Yes, that way it keeps whatever it's used in from overheating to. As I've figgured out that it does not bring any direct personal harm, I'll share it with the NWO, just come over and pick it up after watching it being made by the ASSLOAD. Twitter: @TheMather1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VEGHATERMEATLOVER Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Mather Pro'sCan shapeshift slowlyvirtually impenatrble to physical attacks Con'sCan be killed by things like radiationcan't keep a solid form very easilyslowIf in space it gets spread out, It mess'smust keep together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seraphi Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Hex, click your fingers.You have just killed hundereds of bacteria.They are not virtually invulnerable to melee attacks, a solid blow (Railgun shot, shotgun type weapon, a punch .]etc)would kill millions of them and probably split the entire being apart. Honestly, this race isn't very well thought through.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VEGHATERMEATLOVER Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Hex, click your fingers.You have just killed hundereds of bacteria.They are not virtually invulnerable to melee attacks, a solid blow (Railgun shot, shotgun type weapon, a punch .]etc)would kill millions of them and probably split the entire being apart. Honestly, this race isn't very well thought through....A railgun would kill them, A shotgun or punch wouldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seraphi Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Both of them would split the being apart, rendering it basically useless. A punch may have been an exagurration, but a shotgun would basically mean instant destruction, probably multiple kills per shot as well. The spread of the projectile means it hits numerous points in the form, meaning it can't maintain stability, due to missing parts. The force from the shell would also kill millions, if not billions of bacteria. Or, somebody could just use a flamethrower and basically annihilate your army. Please, just think of a different race. I'm not doing this because I don't like you, thats a whole other matter, but your race would be so incredibly weak, the moment you enter a war, you'd basically be screwed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VEGHATERMEATLOVER Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 (edited) Both of them would split the being apart, rendering it basically useless. A punch may have been an exagurration, but a shotgun would basically mean instant destruction, probably multiple kills per shot as well. The spread of the projectile means it hits numerous points in the form, meaning it can't maintain stability, due to missing parts. The force from the shell would also kill millions, if not billions of bacteria. Or, somebody could just use a flamethrower and basically annihilate your army. Please, just think of a different race. I'm not doing this because I don't like you, thats a whole other matter, but your race would be so incredibly weak, the moment you enter a war, you'd basically be screwed.Moving onto a more robust race then.these animals are about the size of flea's and encased in a kerotin casing and excrete jelly, works same as i've said earlier. Wait, I'm not, Do you know how fast bacteria reproduce? as I clicked my hand more bacteria reproduced, I'm sure themather1 has some sort of tech that I could use to expand that. Edited October 8, 2009 by Hextriplet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Mather1 Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Both of them would split the being apart, rendering it basically useless. A punch may have been an exagurration, but a shotgun would basically mean instant destruction, probably multiple kills per shot as well. The spread of the projectile means it hits numerous points in the form, meaning it can't maintain stability, due to missing parts. The force from the shell would also kill millions, if not billions of bacteria. Or, somebody could just use a flamethrower and basically annihilate your army. Please, just think of a different race. I'm not doing this because I don't like you, thats a whole other matter, but your race would be so incredibly weak, the moment you enter a war, you'd basically be screwed.Moving onto a more robust race then.these animals are about the size of flea's and encased in a kerotin casing and excrete jelly, works same as i've said earlier.No need to change, even though firing at it will kill millions of bacteria, the rest will just take their place, and as bacteria reproduce by splitting it'l make more bacteria than even a railgun can kill. Also you could use extremofiles as "skin" to make it invounerable to radiation, heat, acids, etc. And not even the vacuum of space can rip bacteria apart, if a person leaves a space craft without his suit his cells don't rip apart, his bodily fluids may be dragged out but that is because they're not fastened to the rest of the body. Bacteria can reproduce at an almost alarming rate, remember that cells are basicly the same, we evolve from one cell to bilions in less than 9 months. Twitter: @TheMather1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seraphi Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Bacteria don't reproduce as fast as you can kill them with fire. Not even close. Okay, screw it, I'll just sit back and let rocco beat some sense into you.I can't be bothered to argue my point anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VEGHATERMEATLOVER Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 (edited) Both of them would split the being apart, rendering it basically useless. A punch may have been an exagurration, but a shotgun would basically mean instant destruction, probably multiple kills per shot as well. The spread of the projectile means it hits numerous points in the form, meaning it can't maintain stability, due to missing parts. The force from the shell would also kill millions, if not billions of bacteria. Or, somebody could just use a flamethrower and basically annihilate your army. Please, just think of a different race. I'm not doing this because I don't like you, thats a whole other matter, but your race would be so incredibly weak, the moment you enter a war, you'd basically be screwed.Moving onto a more robust race then.these animals are about the size of flea's and encased in a kerotin casing and excrete jelly, works same as i've said earlier.No need to change, even though firing at it will kill millions of bacteria, the rest will just take their place, and as bacteria reproduce by splitting it'l make more bacteria than even a railgun can kill. Also you could use extremofiles as "skin" to make it invounerable to radiation, heat, acids, etc. And not even the vacuum of space can rip bacteria apart, if a person leaves a space craft without his suit his cells don't rip apart, his bodily fluids may be dragged out but that is because they're not fastened to the rest of the body. Bacteria can reproduce at an almost alarming rate, remember that cells are basicly the same, we evolve from one cell to bilions in less than 9 months.Clever :), I realised that a just before :) Also, the whole race could be extremophiles. Bacteria don't reproduce as fast as you can kill them with fire. Not even close.Yeh but i'll research it i asked mather if he had any tech which could even that outOkay, screw it, I'll just sit back and let rocco beat some sense into you.I can't be bothered to argue my point anymore. You were planning on that anyway Edited October 8, 2009 by Hextriplet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Lord Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Pax Britannica: 19/20 (will be done Friday)2 long-range colony ships: 5/64 battlecruisers: 4/6Project Stellar Strife A: 6/6 [DONE]Project Stellar Strife B: 2/8S2E: 10/10 [DONE] * There was a surge of funding into the project. SWAG Mayn U wanna be like me but U can't be me cuz U ain't got ma swagga on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Mather1 Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Both of them would split the being apart, rendering it basically useless. A punch may have been an exagurration, but a shotgun would basically mean instant destruction, probably multiple kills per shot as well. The spread of the projectile means it hits numerous points in the form, meaning it can't maintain stability, due to missing parts. The force from the shell would also kill millions, if not billions of bacteria. Or, somebody could just use a flamethrower and basically annihilate your army. Please, just think of a different race. I'm not doing this because I don't like you, thats a whole other matter, but your race would be so incredibly weak, the moment you enter a war, you'd basically be screwed.Moving onto a more robust race then.these animals are about the size of flea's and encased in a kerotin casing and excrete jelly, works same as i've said earlier.No need to change, even though firing at it will kill millions of bacteria, the rest will just take their place, and as bacteria reproduce by splitting it'l make more bacteria than even a railgun can kill. Also you could use extremofiles as "skin" to make it invounerable to radiation, heat, acids, etc. And not even the vacuum of space can rip bacteria apart, if a person leaves a space craft without his suit his cells don't rip apart, his bodily fluids may be dragged out but that is because they're not fastened to the rest of the body. Bacteria can reproduce at an almost alarming rate, remember that cells are basicly the same, we evolve from one cell to bilions in less than 9 months.Clever :), I realised that a just before :) Also, the whole race could be extremophiles. Bacteria don't reproduce as fast as you can kill them with fire. Not even close.Yeh but i'll research it i asked mather if he had any tech which could even that outOkay, screw it, I'll just sit back and let rocco beat some sense into you.I can't be bothered to argue my point anymore. You were planning on that anywayFire would not kill some extremophiles, there might even be extremophiles living on Mercury(and in mercury). Twitter: @TheMather1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seraphi Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 From what I have here, most Extremophiles don't fare that well over about 150 Degrees celsius, and I'm pretty sure fire is hotter than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walka92 Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 my supply spaceships have nearly reached the new planet; should be maybe 3-4 more years before they do.i am working on replacing all my satelites (both comm and offensive) due to their age- to prevent failuresi am also getting quite bored and looking for someone to attack. *yawns* I'm gonna be walking down an alley in varrock, and walka is going to walk up to me in a trench coat and say "psst.. hey man, wanna buy some sara brew"walka92- retired with 99 in attack, strength, defence, health, magic, ranged, prayer and herblore and 137 combat. some day i may return to claim 138 combat, but alas, that time has not yet come Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Mather1 Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 From what I have here, most Extremophiles don't fare that well over about 150 Degrees celsius, and I'm pretty sure fire is hotter than that.Extremophiles mean organisms that thrive in some sort of extreme environements, extreme temperatures are one of them, just like high level radiation and strong acids. Twitter: @TheMather1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seraphi Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 From what I have here, most Extremophiles don't fare that well over about 150 Degrees celsius, and I'm pretty sure fire is hotter than that.Extremophiles mean organisms that thrive in some sort of extreme environements, extreme temperatures are one of them, just like high level radiation and strong acids.I know, but for a variety to have multiple properties is quite rare.I would say that he would be allowed to have two of the properties. Heat resistance will only work up to around 150 celsius, acid resistance means they're weak to alkali and vice versa, cold resistance only works to about -25 degrees.Not sure about the pressure resistance. Some have survival properties, growing without much nutrition, growing in very dry locations etc. But, as I said, there are very few varieties with multiple properties, and it will usually only be a mixture of one or two, since to have one which has all of the properties(Or indeed, any more than 2 properties), it would have had to go through a very, very complex evolutionary path, and it probably would have died out along the way due to changing conditions and not gaining a new property fast enough. tl;dr Whichever two resistances he chooses make him that much weaker to the opposite end of that resistance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Mather1 Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 From what I have here, most Extremophiles don't fare that well over about 150 Degrees celsius, and I'm pretty sure fire is hotter than that.Extremophiles mean organisms that thrive in some sort of extreme environements, extreme temperatures are one of them, just like high level radiation and strong acids.I know, but for a variety to have multiple properties is quite rare.I would say that he would be allowed to have two of the properties. Heat resistance will only work up to around 150 celsius, acid resistance means they're weak to alkali and vice versa, cold resistance only works to about -25 degrees.Not sure about the pressure resistance. Some have survival properties, growing without much nutrition, growing in very dry locations etc. But, as I said, there are very few varieties with multiple properties, and it will usually only be a mixture of one or two, since to have one which has all of the properties(Or indeed, any more than 2 properties), it would have had to go through a very, very complex evolutionary path, and it probably would have died out along the way due to changing conditions and not gaining a new property fast enough.-25 celsius or farenheit? And I think bacteria can merge together getting all their properties. Twitter: @TheMather1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seraphi Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 -25 celsius. Different species of Bacteria will not merge together, they will instead try to kill each other.Therefore, 2 properties maximum, unless you have a few million days left to play this game and evolve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Mather1 Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 -25 celsius. Different species of Bacteria will not merge together, they will instead try to kill each other.Therefore, 2 properties maximum, unless you have a few million days left to play this game and evolve.We survive under -25 celsius and we're not extremophiles. They mrge by killing and eating eachother, therefore gaining eachothers abilities. Twitter: @TheMather1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts