Hegemony

[a_bert]

Leader name: albert

National Anthem: albert is the greatest x100

Random fact: albert really is the greatest eheheh

 

Annex Chile [note: foreign influence != argentinian)

Annex paraguay

rest of IAG goes to funding military service for 18-24 year olds

and building a glorious monolith to albert in the mountains

 

lolwut

 

also the argentinian army invades the one city of uraguay :3

 

edit: well that sucks argentina's GDP apparently increased by 450 billion in the last 10 years but for some reason I don't get that :3

[Retech]

Oh yes, and technology is being developed with Canadian companies to extract oil from the oil sand at even cheaper prices. Currently in 2010, the price is slightly higher than conventional crude, but with government subsidies, should be around the same price.

[VEGHATERMEATLOVER]

Rest of money is spent on infastructure.

childrens curriculums have changed to be much more technolgy orientated.

 

 

BREAKING NEWS

hing-ting is back, a person from the prisons has ben specially chosen to spend the rest of his life in the bunny costume. He will have no friends, social life, ability to talk or eat or go to the toilet normally. He is now the bunny and will stay that way in his specially designed bunny playpen where all the children can stroke and play with him, a kick in the stomachs good luck. The bunny will now drink water through tubes, poo on the floor by a specially designed flap and will be chemically castrated over a long period of time to make sure that he is more placid.

[archimage_a]

Who wants America to be nerfed down to 1.5 Trillion? The same as other developed countries?

[a_bert]

yes

 

edit: that's the same as the other developed countries? honestly, promote the fricken' imbalance more

 

Argentina is doing well is 2010 but I only have 250b and you want America to be NERFED to ONLY 6 times as much? eh

 

+1 to Rocco

 

perhaps not exactly the same but yeah

[The Dark Lord]

A defence pact with the Icelandic government is being worked out.

[Retech]

I vote we all start on the same level...

 

Agreed, but it doesn't exactly work in our framework of the game. Don't you think I would've chosen a better country than the US if we're having its GDP nerfed?

[archimage_a]

Well are only 2 hours into the game, so we can still change stuff.

[Retech]

We could just, y'know, pause the game and work it out before continuing. I'm not a big fan of doing something, then having to rework everything because it changes. Doesn't mean that I agree or disagree with the changes, it just means I don't like doing it twice.

[The Dark Lord]

To be honest, we played without the US in the game for the longest. It added a lot more fun to the game.

[archimage_a]

I agree with Retech, its why I wanted a day before the game actually started to work out any bugs(then promptly slept through most of it)

[VEGHATERMEATLOVER]

I told you we should've been equal at the start of th tread.

Now let's bit be idiots and lock the thread or stop it, let's just agree on our IAG and give everyone the same.

I suggest 500 billion each.

[Retech]

I agree with Retech, its why I wanted a day before the game actually started to work out any bugs(then promptly slept through most of it)

 

Since I'm basically the only one affected by this, what we could do is have all developed countries that are already considered developed countries have a GDP of one trillion, second world countries have a GDP of half a trillion, and third world have a GDP of their actual real life GDP.

 

Also, if this happens, I am taking Canada.

[The Dark Lord]

I told you we should've been equal at the start of th tread.

Now let's bit be idiots and lock the thread or stop it, let's just agree on our IAG and give everyone the same.

I suggest 500 billion each.

 

 

*sigh*

 

It was a lot more fun when we played Hegemony because we DIDN'T start off the same. Even though we're unequal, that doesn't mean nations such as Iran or Brazil can't become superpowers. You just need to be more creative and less idiotic.

 

If the US is too much of a problem, then we could make it a shadow country. That's what we did with China and the US in the original game. It was fun.

 

It would also be more fun if annexations required force.

[archimage_a]

Well it would be the USA and Japan, since they are rather far ahead...

 

But I think changing it to 1.5 trillion for first world countries and 750 billion for second world countries would be easy enough.

[Retech]

Also, I request that I begin with the territory of the United States and Canada, though only with the GDP of Canada. This is because if the US became a shadow country, any chance of expansion would be incredibly limited, considering...the US is in the center of the continent.

 

I actually agree with Sere on this one.

 

----

 

Sleep time now. Here's a map if we want to go with the 1.5 trillion, 750 billion idea.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Imf-advanced-un-least-developed-2008.svg

[archimage_a]

Hmmm....Ok....What if we randomly assigned a figure between 1 and 2 trillion to first world countries? That would keep everything intact....

 

Not sure about Annexations, does anyone else have any views?

[VEGHATERMEATLOVER]

What was the problem with the GDP system? It seemed fine to me.

 

Archi, instead of forcing us to do th hegemony your way why can't we do it how we did it for all 400 pages before we got moved to falador tavern, no-one complained and everyone was happy.

Systems aren't fun, a bit of guesswork never hurt anyone (well, actually it has countless times but in this context never)

[Seraphi]

I'd say balance would be much better if the US and China were just shadow countries like in the first game.

 

India is a special case, because of all the poverty.

[Wisp]

How about we keep gdp's how they are, and have it like this.

If you invest 100% into infrastructure, over 10 years, you have a 60% IAG growth, if your gdp is under 100 billion.

50% if under 500 billion

40 if under 1 trillion

30 if under 3

20 if under 7

10 for under 10

2% for anything above 10

That means that it'll even out, but the countries that start higher will still have a lead for a while. This way all countries can catch up, it just takes time.

Once you get to the next level it'll go down to that rate, etc.

[Retech]

And Japan? In 2000, Japan was a heck of a lot richer than China, I think.

 

 

 

 

Also, what of my request to start with the territory of Canada and the US, but only the GDP of Canada? Considering that I'm giving up my country, and as Canada, I can't expand anywhere with the US there, where it's essentially invincible.

[archimage_a]

Hex I have not forced anyone to do anything....

[a_bert]

Doom's system

[VEGHATERMEATLOVER]

Do this or you'll die is technically not forcing, it's giving someone a choice.

There was no need for this IAG system, GDP was accurate and even if it was slightly unrealistic it still worked.

Your making rules for things that no-ones complaining about.

[Wisp]

For reference, for brazil it would take 25 years ish to get from 1.5-> 3 trillion. To get from 3 trillion to 7 it would take another 40. From 7 trillion to 10 it would take another 35. So to get from 1.5 trillion to 10 trillion it would take 100 days. During that time the US would go from 13 trillion -> 20 trillion.