I'd love to play, but each time I run that game it plays for a little while then crashes. I may give it a go agaaiin soon though.

What are your computer's specs?

I've ran the game on an Intel GMA from 06, so most computers should be able to handle it.

What are your computer's specs?

 

2.60 duo core processor

 

2Gb RAM

 

And I'm not sure the size but an integrated graphics card.

You should post your issue on the Paradox forums then, since yourcomputer should easily be able to run it.

All it literally does is load LOAD LOAD and freakin load.

 

It is seriously the most annoying thing. The startup takes almost 10 minutes. To load a game is like what the hell crazy, and if I want to go back to the menu, JESUS.

 

In my steam games it says I've played almost 100 minutes of it, no joke, atleast 80 minutes were taken up by loading.

I just discovered that at the bottom of the forum, where it says who is viewing the forum, the name is italicized when a user is posting. Hooray for the powers of observation!

Doesn't work that well anymore though, because (I assume) most people use fast reply.

 

Fishing in H&H takes forever...

They do? I've always used the regular reply, because then it refreshes the page as well.

I always do unless I need to stylize the text, and then just Crtl+R

You find a persons true worth when they are faced with a situation that they can't handle.

You find a persons true worth when they are faced with a situation that they can't handle.

 

This quote is random, but I feel like expanding upon it. :o

 

So, how is one's worth proven in such a situation? I'm curious. :)

You find a persons true worth when they are faced with a situation that they can't handle.

 

This quote is random, but I feel like expanding upon it. :o

 

So, how is one's worth proven in such a situation? I'm curious. :)

Its not a quote its just my own statement.

 

Any person can hide there personality or act with integrity when something is easy. If a person can not handle something you will see there true colours come out; do they give up, try there best, take the easy option or delegate to somebody else? Basically I am stating that you can't judge a person on what they do when it is easy for someone; that is just a matter of intelligence or strength. If they can't do it you will know how hard they are willing to work to get the job done and thus.

I'm fairly sure that's a classic quote from somewhere. Perhaps slightly different terms, but the gist of it is the same.

I'm fairly sure that's a classic quote from somewhere. Perhaps slightly different terms, but the gist of it is the same.

I must have heard it and assumed it was my own idea.

Every idea a human has is probably in either the same terms or the same Idea from somewhere. The best we can do is make sure we know if it's a more obvious thing or an obscure thing.

Every idea a human has is probably in either the same terms or the same Idea from somewhere. The best we can do is make sure we know if it's a more obvious thing or an obscure thing.

 

Wouldn't that be incorrect considering that somewhere someone had to have the first original idea?

True, but in present terms there is no original idea besides the stabs into the unkown and mumblings of insane men and women. Timelime terms my statement is incorect, yes, but in some respects it is not.

Ideas are rarely the same, there are a lot of similarities, as there are a much smaller number of thoughts...

 

EG:

Games of Hegemony are rarely the same, there are a lot of similarities, since there are a finite number of ways to write the rules, but you are terribly unlikely to ever get the same game because it isn't just the rules that define a game, but the players, their opinions and their random lives which change things.

 

Ideas are like that...

Every idea a human has is probably in either the same terms or the same Idea from somewhere. The best we can do is make sure we know if it's a more obvious thing or an obscure thing.

 

Wouldn't that be incorrect considering that somewhere someone had to have the first original idea?

No such thing as an original idea.

Well that comes under the territory of, when the first idea for anything ever came about it had to have been original.

 

But then again you could always blow down that argument saying that the person was inspired by their surroundings. Such as a circular rock giving birth to the wheel. If you get what I mean.

 

I just think that there has been an original idea atleast.

It depends on what you define as a person's true worth. If you judge it by a contribution to society or even a contribution to self, then that's definitely not true.

No such thing as an original idea.

 

'If you ground down the universe into the finest sand, and sieved it through the finest sieve, then you would not find one atom of justice, one molecule of mercy. And yet - and yet you act like there is some ideal order in the world, as if there some...some rightness in the Universe by which it may be judged.'

 

You can't say that originality is impossible. Every time you lie you invent ideas, and even if you say that we are just using other events, not inventing them, then I say the above...Mercy, Justice, Freedom...They are all Human Inventions, or at least someone, somewhere, invented them, because they don't exist in nature.

Unless you happen to be someone who is Godfearing, in which case I would say that God is an original thinker.

If you aren't...then surely God is an example of something else original.

 

 

If you want to be obtuse then yeah, everything can be defined in joules, or watts, or whatever...thoughts, definations and ideas as configerations of mass and energy, but what does that get you? The truth? No, it just means you are so close you can't see the wood for the trees.

errr what

Hmmm...

 

Discussion: 'Does Original Thought Exist?'

Proposal: 'No, everything is copied from something else.'

Counter-Proposal: 'What about Mercy, it doesn't occur naturally, so someone must have invented it.'