Kostya Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Anyone "green" is a low level. Anyone "red" isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petey Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 hopfully that sig is out dated... your prolly not a noob or a newb, you an exewb (experinced newb) nice wordputogetheridge [ se what did there :wink: ] yeah what he said :roll: Which Final Fantasy Character Are You?Final Fantasy Currently Listening To ~ Hotel California / The Eagles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheezddls999 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 noobs call people low level players... they have no life... no friends and feed on insulting others so that they feel all ahppy inside :P one of the most satisfying answers on this topic ive ever read..congrats salim123 :!: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uula Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 The term "low level" depends on where it's being used. Like... A low level with fire cape could be <85 combat, a low level at castle wars could be <50 combat, a low level with 1500 total ... say <85 combat, everything depends on what they do or have achieved. "low level" to me, is a compliment. A low level at CW is someone who actually knows what s/he's doing, someone who just puts barricades inside the team room (or similar), is a newbie. If s/he does it again after being told it's not good, s/he's a noob Noobs are immature people, that act plain annoying. Hackers are not noobs, they're idiots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanides Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 well this is gonna sound fairly noobish but ur a low lv when u think ur a low lv and when u think ur a high lv ur high lv. It think its basically wut u believe urself 8-), yes even lv 3 lol... i know ppl r gona copy this into there own thread and call me a noob but meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord_K Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 I dunno, anyone under level 40 is "low leveled", but that doesn't really matter because I always think total level is more important. Combat to be fair is easy to train compared to lets say farming or thieving. Also combat level makes other skills easy to train, you have more hitpoints, its easier to make money, monsters aren't aggressive etcetera. As posted earlier lower level=failure, noob etc higher level than you=loser, no lifer plays too much sadly /\ isn't too far from the truth any people believe.... What I do find depressing is lvl 90 members who just have tele to Varrock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
handyguy Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 A consider people to be "noobs" if there below my level. Not always but..most the time :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rune0nite Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 newb= in my opinion is anyone with no stats over 50 with some exceptions noob= 3-126's Just an average player with a horrible name... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iv_Green_vI Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 lol if i came across you not knowing ur stats i wouldnt consider you a noob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrscrounger Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 under 600 total f2p and 1000 total member there are some exceptions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aresgodowar Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 am i a noob? Americans love to fight. All real Americans love the sting of battle. George S. Patton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1canadian1 Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 No the guy I was talking about is level 3 and is 21st in agility. TOTAL LEVEL IS POWER! The level 3 wasnt zzzamorak. I know 6 level 3 skillers that are people's main. RSN: Zammyftw ^^The girl that ruined music. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumpta Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 It's all point of view I guess. Usually, I wouldn't consider lvl 60-70's as newbs/noobs, but lately, more and more of these fairly good lvls start begging and bugging. You'd think they'd have enough gaming experience to know that that is a generally bad idea. I have 91 cb and a skill total of 1395 or so. I'm quite happy with it (been playing for 9 months, 4 months of membership), but I still don't consider myself anywhere near high level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eveau6013 Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 Personally, I'm 76 combat and 1103 skill total, and would consider myself somewhat noobly. Although I've been playing since late '01, I've never had more than a million at any one time. I'd consider levels <80 to be low, speaking on a combat standview. But I feel that, as long as the avatar is a main, combat level is a pretty good indicator of a minimum skill total. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonnyb Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 well I think level 50- is low leveled but not a noob or a newb. Im level 65 but my level 85 main got banned :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iantiger Posted June 11, 2006 Share Posted June 11, 2006 In my opinion: Combat: Below 70 = low level 70-89 = solid character 90-99 = good level 100-109 = high level 110+ = very high level Skill Total: Below 1000 = low level 1000-1099 = solid 1100 - 1299 = good level 1300 - 1599 = high level 1600+ = very high level ~Ian Retired Tip It Moderator | Zybez Radio DJ - Listen Here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now