Jump to content

Dan Brown and Mathew Reily


elucin8er

Recommended Posts

Anyone read these guys? They are the best two authors in the world :oops:

 

 

 

If you're a keen reader, I highly suggest you read anything by these two. Preferablly Seven Ancient wonders or The Da Vinci Code.

jd4mfinalsmal0jp.gif

 

Proper Daily blogging including Starcraft 2!

 

Includes goal for 80+ all stats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best authors in the world?... oh my >.< You havnt read many books have you?

612d9da508.png

Mercifull.png

Mercifull <3 Suzi

"We don't want players to be able to buy their way to success in RuneScape. If we let players start doing this, it devalues RuneScape for others. We feel your status in real-life shouldn't affect your ability to be successful in RuneScape" Jagex 01/04/01 - 02/03/12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mathew Reily is great, but has a weird style of writing. Fave book would probably be hover car racer.

 

 

 

I just finished Hovercar Racer, it was a different concept to his other books, no guns or violence, I enjoyed it :D

smudgerequestredbluesigxs5.png

Check out my blog here!

Thanks Jopie211 for the sig

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read a fair bit of Dan Browns stuff and although they are easy to read and have goodish plots, the actual writing sucks. I'd take Philip Pullman or Joseph Heller anytime.

 

 

 

Possibally the best bit of writing I've ever read.

 

 

 

There was only one catch and that was Catch-22, which specified that a concern for one's safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. Orr was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask; and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would have to fly more missions. Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, but if he was sane he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn't have to; but if he didn't want to he was sane and had to. Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle. 'That's some catch, that Catch-22,' he observed. 'It's the best there is,' Doc Daneeka agreed.

 

ragenori9bosq4.gif

Thanks Venomai for this super sig and Kwimbob for the awesome avatar!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan Brown's "Angels and Demons" is a great book. One of the best I've read even though I disagreed with it. Those who say The Da Vinci Code was the best clearly haven't read this book.

 

 

 

Honestly, I think Ted Dekker's the best author out there.

I'm currently transitioning from a Wizard to a Mage and a Priest to an Archpriest. Lol both are nonexistant in the top 25. Hopefully I can change that. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no best author, just like there are no best artists. Writing is far too subjective to have any one or two "best".

 

 

 

That's not saying there aren't good and bad authors, and some authors are definitely better than others.

 

 

 

 

 

I definitely wouldn't consider Dan Brown one of the better ones, though. His books are like textualized action movies. Bleh.

IRKAa.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Reilly's books read like movies, and I therefore enjoy them immensely. My favorite would have to be Ice Station.

sigon4.jpg

handed me TWO tissues to clear up. I was like "i'm going to need a few more paper towels than that luv"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan Brown's "Angels and Demons" is a great book. One of the best I've read even though I disagreed with it. Those who say The Da Vinci Code was the best clearly haven't read this book.

 

 

 

Honestly, I think Ted Dekker's the best author out there.

 

 

 

Is it not a fictional book? How can you...disagree...with fiction...?

 

 

 

The website itself says it is fiction...Soooo, yea. Forgive me if they're wrong.

The popularity of any given religion today depends on the victories of the wars they fought in the past.

- Me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matthew Reily is a pretty terrible author imo >.< All of his books follow the same guide exactly. Hover Car Racer (I can't believe I actually finished that book, 14 hour plane flight is to blame) was the exception.

 

Generally:

 

1. O noes, a building/area has been taken over by bad guys

 

2. A generic "hero" from one of the "elite" defense agencies is coincidently in the area.

 

3. A lead character is killed, everyone whines.

 

4. The bad guys are defeated, everyone cheers.

 

 

 

I will admit I enjoyed the Da Vinci Code, probably because the media storm had already erupted by the time I read it. I made an attempt to read Digital Fortress, however it was so terrible I stopped mid way (One of very few times I've ever done this.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read a fair bit of Dan Browns stuff and although they are easy to read and have goodish plots, the actual writing sucks. I'd take Philip Pullman or Joseph Heller anytime.

 

 

 

Possibally the best bit of writing I've ever read.

 

 

 

There was only one catch and that was Catch-22, which specified that a concern for one's safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. Orr was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask; and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would have to fly more missions. Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, but if he was sane he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn't have to; but if he didn't want to he was sane and had to. Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle. 'That's some catch, that Catch-22,' he observed. 'It's the best there is,' Doc Daneeka agreed.

 

 

 

 

Catch 22 is good, i am half way through reading it = )

 

 

 

Matthew Reily is a good author but is pulp fiction, to be the best writer you would need more substance meaning etc. imo that is.

heartogoldcopy1oo5cv.jpg

A big shout-out to o0samurai0o for the awesome sig!!!

Members is hawt

101 Combat

{Live Fast. Die Young. Leave A Good Looking Corpse}

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matthew Reily is a pretty terrible author imo >.< All of his books follow the same guide exactly. Hover Car Racer (I can't believe I actually finished that book, 14 hour plane flight is to blame) was the exception.

 

Generally:

 

1. O noes, a building/area has been taken over by bad guys

 

2. A generic "hero" from one of the "elite" defense agencies is coincidently in the area.

 

3. A lead character is killed, everyone whines.

 

4. The bad guys are defeated, everyone cheers.

 

 

 

I will admit I enjoyed the Da Vinci Code, probably because the media storm had already erupted by the time I read it. I made an attempt to read Digital Fortress, however it was so terrible I stopped mid way (One of very few times I've ever done this.)

 

 

 

You can't leave out how the main character always gets out of impossible situations, either by flipping the car in some totally ingenious way or by someone showing up at the exact moment he is in the middle of nowhere and doing some extradinary. Still a good read though. :XD:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Is it not a fictional book? How can you...disagree...with fiction...?

 

 

 

The website itself says it is fiction...Soooo, yea. Forgive me if they're wrong.

 

 

 

you can disagree with the ideas which are put forward through and reinforced with fiction...

tmpphpnppgpw.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Catch 22 is one of the best books ever! :D Certainly the funniest.

 

I didn't read any Matthew Reilly but Dan Brown is ok. I read the Da Vinci code in a day and a half or so. Agree or disagree with his ideas, or his style, you can't deny that the book is entertaining and it keeps you curious to read more.

"Metal isn't about violence or faggy whiny lyrics. It isn't even about who plays the heaviest and fastest. It is about invoking a sense of wonder and magnitude that no other genre can depict."

bluarosezk0.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest GhostRanger
Dan Brown's "Angels and Demons" is a great book. One of the best I've read even though I disagreed with it. Those who say The Da Vinci Code was the best clearly haven't read this book.

 

 

 

Honestly, I think Ted Dekker's the best author out there.

 

 

 

Is it not a fictional book? How can you...disagree...with fiction...?

 

 

 

The website itself says it is fiction...Soooo, yea. Forgive me if they're wrong.

 

 

 

I recently read a fiction novel that takes place during the Revolutionary War. In it the book describing a fictional story about a non-fiction event, the character goes to battles that happened and meets with people who actually existed.

 

 

 

The main story is fiction, but the Revolutionary War is not a fiction event.

 

 

 

In The DaVinci Code and other Dan Brown books, Dan Brown says the story is fiction, because it is. But the conspiracy he wrote about is a conspiracy that people actually believe, just like some people choose to believe that the moon landing was a conspiracy.

 

 

 

Piano isn't saying he disagrees with the obviously fiction story, he's saying he disagrees with the widely debated conspiracy theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.