compfreak847

7/10

Lol, just realized he's a big RS moviemaker... Kudos to me :thumbsup:

It's fun :P

Nah, there's some concurrent debating going on. Ydrasil phases in and out with new data that requires disproving, so at any given time there's usually several debates going on :P The new minigame is a very bad way to train slayer. Not only is it horrendously slow, it doesn't offer the combat XP\drops that real slayer does.

downed 22 kills in 2 hours, including 2 void and 3 DH. I'm a beast. Bruno, watch out.

Not true, it only applies to players.

Thanks :P It's odd, because I'm often criticized for doing exactly that. Yes, I do come off as a heartless machine when debating, but that's how debates are SUPPOSED to be :lol: I'm a much nicer person in game\real life, I swear :?

Yep, just throwing it out there. The only problem is how that's measured; it can be skewed either way, but I'd go with bottom and top most pixel; leaving it open to interpretation is generally a bad idea.

Was killing myself for another round of PJing when someone popped up next to me at my POH, so I specced him out: Not bad drops, either: I love PJing EDIT: New, weird kill: This guy came up to me and blitzed without prayer on, he had literally 1 HP left after the specs, he ate a shark and I hit him for 21: (Notice that I'm not skulled :lol: )

I cast my vote for total pixel size...

http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Prayer

Nope. With 59 mage, you will be 34-35 combat. Compare apples to apples, not apples to a hydrogen bomb.

All you say is that it's your opinion. All I'm saying is that your opinion is dead wrong and worthless; all of your 'reasons' have been completely proven wrong, and you have no rebuttal. That speaks volumes about your confidence in your so called opinions.

Hint: try fighting people your own level. Yes, a 35 mage will probably lose to a 65 meleer. And believe it or not, a 130 mage (if such a thing was possible) will probably beat a 65 meleer. Also, you must be experiencing a bug with your bind spells; the time is 5 seconds, and at the standard 4 squares per minute run rate, you should be able to run 20 squares instead of two. I would report it so they can get that fixed and you can experience the full power of FTP mage :thumbsup:

So what? Yeah, out of 130,000,000 accounts a few hundred of them might be unfairly banned. I have over 500 friends, you don't have to have someone on a list to be friends with them =D> That was several eons before all of these terrible updates of which you speak. Yes, it was a bad idea. I have quite effectively proven you wrong on every single point mentioned in your entire post. Rather then trying to back them up, you simply cop out and say it's your opinion - which it may be, but your opinion is irrevocably wrong and as such, does not count for anything. Have a nice day. Apparently, it already has.

Gratz

Exactly. "Danger" becomes a joke. Close to dying? Pull the plug, wait for a friend to get there to bless your grave\protect you. Terrible idea.

Sorry, I sympathize with you but this will be locked. It's your ISP's fault, not Jagex. Get a better ISP :|

Will rate when there is an avatar to rate. Please don't pull an ABC... EDIT: Flood control killed my rate. 7/10 to abc

Then please do so. My (biased) explanation would center on Pyro's refusing to commit to a firm standard in the PMs, then ignoring the problem in this thread until I brought it up many times, then refusing to acknowledge that it was oversize until I was forced to screengrab it to prove it, then his declarations about the moderating team changing the size requirements with no announcements whatsoever, the refusal to either restore my old signature or remove EMRs, and the complete lack of information on what his guidelines are. Basically, I don't want to make this personal, and I would rather just settle it with pyro then have to escalated it to an admin. I guess we need solid guidelines, but I feel that until then Pyro was unjustified to remove my signature while leaving dozens of others that I pointed out with larger signatures unpunished - it dates back to the thread I argued with Pyro on before this all started. All we really need is to contact an admin and get hard numbers on the pixel\text size limit so I can begin reporting the other users with oversize signatures or have my old one restored. All I'm saying is that I want specific numbers for signature limits. Pyro has been constantly changing what he considers to be oversize, and I believe it was in an unfair manner - I posted a list of several other users with larger signatures then mine, and no action was ever taken against them. I wanted to settle it with him without making this into the big issue it has become, but now I guess we need an admin to send out an announcement with the hard numbers so I can get down to reporting and\or get my old signature back.

2/10

An admin doesn't have the background of this, though. It's not just this issue - I have literally dozens of signatures that are oversize according to Pyro's specifications. I'm not trying to be confrontational, I just need to know what the rules are, and I am (justly, I feel) irritated when instead I am given the runaround about how 'oversize' changes from day to day.

Glad I could clear it up :P

Nice, I didn't even know the Latin until I looked it up :lol:

It's just a description of the hits ranging from 1-16, I don't have a graph to show you. Basically meaning where most of the hits lie on the spectrum from 1-16; it's called a hit spread chart. But it has nothing to do with spell accuracy.