Laura

Hah, yeah. Impressive amount of pages though. Yes, I do. :P

Eh, it's just a fact - anything physical has the potential to kill.

Yes, Flash is in the works. Expected in the spring or early summer. I actually browse MacRumors.com because I'm so hesitant to buy a MacBook. But, none the less, I have heard rumors that 3.0 will be coming to the iPhone with Snow Leopard (skips the first digit every OS release. It's, what, 2.2 now?).

1. The ashes could be inhaled, clogging you lungs where you die of suffocation. 2. This is about people in general. 3. Inflamed esophagus, when you swallow it, it goes down so far that it cannot be coughed up, but to far up to be swallowed. Losing balance, and stepping with the slightest step on it, where you slip and fall. I'll try to move to more reasonable approaches, but again, everything physical can kill you. Period. 1. The ashes are spread somewhere remember? Over an ocean, in a forest, etc.. 2. I'm definately not the only person in the world immune to Chicken Pox, or other diseases for that matter. 3. An ice cube of that size would melt before reaching esophogaus 1. Any number could reach someone. 2. Some people aren't. 3. Actually, it depends on how cold the ice is.

1. The ashes could be inhaled, clogging you lungs where you die of suffocation. 2. This is about people in general. 3. Inflamed esophagus, when you swallow it, it goes down so far that it cannot be coughed up, but to far up to be swallowed. Losing balance, and stepping with the slightest step on it, where you slip and fall. I'll try to move to more reasonable approaches, but again, everything physical can kill you. Period.

Funny.

Apple wants to monopolize, and have monopolized, their own market. By not releasing the iPhone/Touch to Java/Flash, it gives developers an incentive to use QuickTime. And, with QuickTime X coming out late in Q2 with OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, it should become far more feasible. Maybe with the iPhone 2,1 which has been spotted on servers in California. The iPhone 3G is doing to well for them to completely revamp it. It'll most likely be an iPhone that doesn't require a data plan, furthering Apple's goal to gain market share. Just my speculation.

Phone and online: Dell. 'Nuff said.

And seeing as matter is pretty much made of nothing, the chances of a single atom hitting you has the same chances as you jumping off a plane and landing on a tuna fish sandwich. Statistically, I think not.

x=(1.672621637(83)×10^-27) (3000 * 10^8 ^2) (92) y=(1.67492729(28)×10^?27) (3000 * 10^8 ^2) (146) z=(9.10938215(45)×10^?31) (3000 * 10^8 ^2) (<32 * 8) e= x + y + z +- .5% If you want, you can calculate it out. I assure you, it is. (the energy in a Uranium atom) want to tell me how much energy that is? also, why arent there any squarings in your math there? Hah, you're right, I forgot to square it. I'm not going to, because the Windows calculator doesn't cut it.

x=(1.672621637(83)×10^-27) (3000 * 10^8^2) (92) y=(1.67492729(28)×10^?27) (3000 * 10^8^2) (146) z=(9.10938215(45)×10^?31) (3000 * 10^8^2) (<32 * 8) e= x + y + z +- .5% If you want, you can calculate it out. I assure you, it is. (the energy in a Uranium atom)

3 Haha Still though, a chip can't kill! Im talking no launches or anything, there is no world's largest chip, or a recorded on how big a chip can be(considering that it is still easily breakble. like a normal chip) You act like its a common thing to walk down the street and a atom splits and kills. CAN YOU at least be more realistic, yes we get it, atoms split. But you said that it takes alot of energy, something not the adverage person wouldn't have to do such a thing. The energy needed is almost negligible compared to the energy gained. I typed a few short sentences until I read his post: It's not a question of 'how common is it', it's a question of 'can it kill you'. And anything physical can kill you, so the answer is NO.

They have the ability to be appealed. And they have. Don't fix what isn't broken. If you take away gun from those that need them, then the ones that do need them are criminals. Crime rates would rise exponentially if we made guns illegal. Criminals will always find a way to get guns. I'd be disgusted to have any such friend. I'm not pro or against blacks, I just see those kinds of narrow-minded and labeling people as the intellectual-toddlers of the earth. I don't hate them, I just see them as the epitome of human conformism and stupidity. Sorry you feel that way. But I'm not going to spoil ten years of a friendship over something such as that - even if I don't believe it's right. The only reason I know now is because I needed a place to stay when I was in Ohio.

They haven't committed a crime yet. Who says they haven't? Really, they should check all their computers for illicit images. Simply because some think that they've committed a crime, that doesn't warrant a violation of their constitutional rights. Oh come on! They've pretty much just shouted that they're pedophiles, why the [bleep] wouldn't it warrent a search? (And do you know how old your precious constitution is?) I have a friend who is a certain organization that dislikes people of different skin color. He's proud to show it too. On the top of his house is painted the Confederate flag. But he hasn't commited a hate crime, so he cannot be arrested. Doing so would break the constitutional right to expression. A search? No judge in his right mind would warrant a search. If he did, it would look bad upon him.

They haven't committed a crime yet.

Go with the refurb. If you're willing to spend another $60 on a monitor, I can find you something much better.

You could easily argue that fatalism and "free" are one in the same.

3 Haha Still though, a chip can't kill! Im talking no launches or anything, there is no world's largest chip, or a recorded on how big a chip can be(considering that it is still easily breakble. like a normal chip)

"Right or Wrong" implies that there is a correct answer.

Did you really have to mention that? Also, this smiley --> ":P" will actually look like a tongue in 100 years. Life knows no ethics. That was a term made by man.

If what you say becomes true, then we will drown in our own waste. Which is why, long term, cancer, disease, and war benefit society.

Let me make this point again, any item dealing with mass, therefore "physical" has the potential to kill. The rambling about "fluff atoms" isn't logically true, because it cannot exist. Atoms are the fundamentals of elements, as in, it is the element. Second, an atom shot at the speed of light is also impossible, because anything with a mass grater than zero cannot be greater than or equal to c, the speed of light. However, atoms can be split, and I don't think I need to explain the dangers involving that. There is no such thing. Quarks are not dependent upon the atom they make up. As I said, it's impossible. But with every creation of particle colliders, we get closer and closer. The fact is, that it's moving around a 2km ring at the speed of light. If someone, let's say, stood within that ring, the atoms would be forced through your body effortlessly every single time it went around.

Au contraire.

Don't buy a Dell. You'll regret it. Practically the support I got when I had mine. [yt]Ryas9OANw-E[/yt]

I don't get it. Why didn't they just make the already released versions of Vista faster instead of wasting their time making something else? Marketing.