Laura

You honestly can not tell me that if WW2 didn't happen we wouldn't be way over populated. Thanks for proving my point about eugenics-sympathizers. The population "drop" from both world wars was tiny (the baby boom brought it right back above where it was before the war), seriously posts like yours make me feel physically sick to read (and that takes a lot), can't believe some people even going as far as attempting to justify the holocaust.. I suppose it's easy for you to support throwing away human life aslong as it's not in your country though (would you still support "population control" if AIDS was killing millions of americans instead?) The holocaust was based on a discrepancy between beliefs. AIDS/HIV doesn't care who it kills. It just kills. I don't know why anyone is comparing the two. So you only care about massive loss of HUMAN LIFE if it's indiscriminate? The human species is more important than the human life. Ah, so in your opinion AIDS is only good if it isn't killing your pure [Caution] race? As it is, it seems like you're making a statement regarding his ethnicity? If so, that's a pretty ignorant statement. AIDS is present in all ethnicities.

You honestly can not tell me that if WW2 didn't happen we wouldn't be way over populated. Thanks for proving my point about eugenics-sympathizers. The population "drop" from both world wars was tiny (the baby boom brought it right back above where it was before the war), seriously posts like yours make me feel physically sick to read (and that takes a lot), can't believe some people even going as far as attempting to justify the holocaust.. I suppose it's easy for you to support throwing away human life aslong as it's not in your country though (would you still support "population control" if AIDS was killing millions of americans instead?) The holocaust was based on a discrepancy between beliefs. AIDS/HIV doesn't care who it kills. It just kills. I don't know why anyone is comparing the two. So you only care about massive loss of HUMAN LIFE if it's indiscriminate? Do you understand what overpopulation does to a species? Why should I value human life as anything more than carbon and water? I'm glad you have high morals for human life, but we can't save everyone, and if we did, we would lose everyone.

You honestly can not tell me that if WW2 didn't happen we wouldn't be way over populated. Thanks for proving my point about eugenics-sympathizers. The population "drop" from both world wars was tiny (the baby boom brought it right back above where it was before the war), seriously posts like yours make me feel physically sick to read (and that takes a lot), can't believe some people even going as far as attempting to justify the holocaust.. I suppose it's easy for you to support throwing away human life aslong as it's not in your country though (would you still support "population control" if AIDS was killing millions of americans instead?) The holocaust was based on a discrepancy between beliefs. AIDS/HIV doesn't care who it kills. It just kills. I don't know why anyone is comparing the two.

All medicine is poison. It just depends on what you kill first. He tells the truth. I laughed so hard at this.

If any judge did accept the lawsuit, they'd most likely be dead before the case started.

What would you even do at the birthday party? Sit and watch your cousin play with other 8/9 year olds? I would have done the same thing, even if I liked that side of the family.

Considering that I prefer anarchy....

You weren't messing around with folders and such? Changed the FrostWire download folder? Anything? Because, what iTunes is doing is it's looking for songs in a specific folder and playing them via that folder. If anything in that folder gets moved or corrupted, it has no idea what to do. Open your music folder (C:\Users\[your account name]\Music) and see if you can't find the iTunes library. Mess around in there and see if you can find the songs.

What type of phone do you have?

Can anyone be bothered to take a screenshot?

i personally thinks she just doesn't look like she cleans herself often. and shes a chubber, with greasy looking hair. She just gave birth! Geez.

In the case of the rape? If they both consent, they can press charges on them both. But usually it's just the oldest one.

Masochist? No, it's just one form of pain that I find pleasing. No one else feels the same way? It is, I can assure you. If you want, I have more available on the Real Life sticky. Though if I was to have a mustache, the one I would like would be:

It's still considered rape in the United States. And perhaps where you live as well. That doesn't mean much tho if nobody is pressing any charges. I never implied that people can't or would. If news got around to him, I guarantee that I can get around to her parents. Heck, even if the teachers find out, they can press charges.

This kind of happened to me, over the summer I stopped working out and just worked really. When school started back up I started working out again and the first time after doing so my arms killed. I used to do this on purpose, because that's the type of pain that I love. Like the soreness after getting shots, I love that as well.

It's still considered rape in the United States. And perhaps where you live as well.

If you don't mind having sex with girls like her, then you can lose your virginity in no time. That photo of the 3 of them together tho looks like a siblings picture more than a family picture. :wall: She looks like she should be his much older sister, not his girlfriend. I thought that was his mom!

Yes, it is. In fact, it should be considered the most important population control. Education isn't going to fix a population, because people, when having sex or children, don't care about the society as a whole. Well, that would be ridiculous. No, my life probably wouldn't suck without them. Most common diseases I have been exposed to aren't preventable. Statistically speaking, my chances of coming along hepatitis(really the only vaccine I can think of that I've had, besides Gardasil) are slim. And that's not generally something that sweeps societies. Anyways, the black plague, should be considered (without morals) a great form of population control now. What was it, a third of Europe was wiped out? While I'm sure that wasn't looked upon then as it is now, but imagine if all of those people that died suddenly had two or more children. The population, using a web effect, would be much greater today as a result. You said that my example would be the absence of combating it, I don't think that's entirely true. We are and will forever attempt to combat whatever we fear, in this case, disease. But rather, as a good for society, we would choose not to combat it. It's a problem everywhere. And, HIV hasn't ravaged many societies yet. Education is the problem. Even with education, people continue to produce offspring, with or without HIV. This leads to dramatic population increases, especially in places such as Africa and Asia where the doubling rates are exceptionally low. China, as an example, only has about 10% of usable area for farmland. So where does their population come from? Why is it still sustainable? Capitalism. Capitalist forms of government in other countries where populations continue to grow, yet they still have enough for exports. That cannot always continue. Eventually, those supplying countries won't have enough excess to sustain any other country but their own. You assume I haven't? Of course, like many, I have lost loved ones to various sorts of diseases and cancers, that doesn't change my stance on the issue.

see drop of water a few pages back excluding stuff like splitting the atoms and anti matter we have confirmed that no, a tiny tiny amount of water cannot kill you If it gets within your blood stream, it could.

With that lady in the back, I'm not to worried.

Ninjas, no doubt.

And we can see how that's working out. Disgustingly? Surely not. While I applaud your support for common human morals, it simply cannot be so. Africa you say. While the world falls in turmoil with capitalism, and the poor have little food to themselves, can you honestly say that we can simply add a few more million? The effects of said cure would have devastating effects on the economy, food, and of course, population. Have you ever heard the phrase, "People will always want diamonds. People will always want gold. But people will always need land." Figures, the one thing we can't make. Anyways, your argument regarding loved ones or yourself with the disease is blatant bias in our human nature. Of course I'm going to care more about my Aunt Sue or Uncle Joe over Mrs. Shrew on Dr. Phil. The point is, we cannot continue to rise at the exponential growth that we are, it's got to end sometime. Attempting to make us invincible doesn't slow that down any, obviously.

I'm imagining a giant olympic pool... and about 10,000 guys around the edge... and a few porn stars in the center... And then drowning. What are these guys, fire hoses?

I agree that Vista was a step back, but stop acting as if it's the first time Microsoft messed up. Take a look at Windows Me. It's impossible for Microsoft for to keep their market share forever, but I don't see a reason why you're so dramatic about it Well over half of the computers around the world run Windows. And even for people who buy Macs, they dual boot some version of Windows. I wasn't. I was explaining the long term faults about licensing an OS like Windows did, and why Apple's marketing will not change; why they're charging Psystar. Someone else brought up Windows.

They're still losing, what they would consider a dramatic market share. Vista trashed Microsoft's reputation and they have given no hint for anyone to upgrade. If you can run Vista, great, but most hardware will run better on XP. They made the "perfect" OS with a great UI, but with a small footprint so most people this day in age were able to use it. Windows 7, eh, it might be better than Vista, perhaps even XP. And I know I, and maybe others, are discouraged by the "flavors" of Windows. How much was Ultimate when it came out? $400? That' more expensive than a computer! The point is, they've been losing market share to OS X and Linux for awhile now.