Leyenda

He has 77 dg

He probably thinks it's a lot because of his dg level

Gem bag takes 1/3 dungeon to get

You can put gem drops in a gem bag

bones

hooray for "mod wannabes" jk (or am I)

Betters can see how many inventory spaces he has open (and suspect that he is carrying rings)

or 'click to continue' menaphite luring

83 no hood

that guy is a genius. he probably stopped a few idiots from making an account

you sound like a scammer

Stop making more work for Jagex

It doesn't matter if you play the game once or 1000 times, the winning ratio is always going to be (4/10). You might get a luck streak and make some money, but the longer you play, the closer your going to get to that 40% win average. Aside from a lucky roll, there is no way to win money playing the game for a long period of time. if you lost 999 games in a row, doubling your bet each time, but won the 1000th game, you would be ahead Yes, but the last roll is independent of all the previous rolls. Doubling your roll every time wont give you a better chance to win once you risk 50% of your pot at the end of your doubling bets. If you lose, you still lose 50% of your 4/10 winnings. That's not to say you WILL lose money, but the longer your play the more chances you roll 1-6 instead of 7-10. What would really determine if you make or lose money is your last 3 rolls when you risk 25%, 50%, and 100% of your pot. If you risk 1 roll you have a 40% chance to win. If you roll 1000 times you will average out to 40% winnings. Therefore it would be safe to say while 1 or 1000 rolls would have the same average payout, a single (or few) roll would have a better factor of luck in not showing the average rolls. So while they are the same probability of winning or losing, a single roll can mask that probability due to the fact the average percent does not have enough time to even out. If you flip a coin once, its still a 50/50 chance to win, but you have a greater chance to stay ahead if you flip heads once and don't allow another attempt for tails to show. Im even confusing myself :-? , but I hope you get what I mean? :blink: No, I meant keep on doubling until you win, then stop (which means take the money and leave) And if you double 8 times and lose all 8 then you should probably just quit So if you're starting bet is 1m, and you double til you win( 8 times max) you're going to risk 255m just to win 1m? Asks casino managers, the only way to win when gambling is to own the casino... Yes; as long as you don't do it multiple times you should come out ahead

It doesn't matter if you play the game once or 1000 times, the winning ratio is always going to be (4/10). You might get a luck streak and make some money, but the longer you play, the closer your going to get to that 40% win average. Aside from a lucky roll, there is no way to win money playing the game for a long period of time. if you lost 999 games in a row, doubling your bet each time, but won the 1000th game, you would be ahead Yes, but the last roll is independent of all the previous rolls. Doubling your roll every time wont give you a better chance to win once you risk 50% of your pot at the end of your doubling bets. If you lose, you still lose 50% of your 4/10 winnings. That's not to say you WILL lose money, but the longer your play the more chances you roll 1-6 instead of 7-10. What would really determine if you make or lose money is your last 3 rolls when you risk 25%, 50%, and 100% of your pot. If you risk 1 roll you have a 40% chance to win. If you roll 1000 times you will average out to 40% winnings. Therefore it would be safe to say while 1 or 1000 rolls would have the same average payout, a single (or few) roll would have a better factor of luck in not showing the average rolls. So while they are the same probability of winning or losing, a single roll can mask that probability due to the fact the average percent does not have enough time to even out. If you flip a coin once, its still a 50/50 chance to win, but you have a greater chance to stay ahead if you flip heads once and don't allow another attempt for tails to show. Im even confusing myself :-? , but I hope you get what I mean? :blink: No, I meant keep on doubling until you win, then stop (which means take the money and leave) And if you double 8 times and lose all 8 then you should probably just quit

What if someone keeps on doubling their bet until they win?

I agree that the flower game has a high probability to be a scam, but don't make up statistics

Same

You should use it by simply clicking on it. DO NOT alch it.

Let me guess -- you're a white male, with no children ... That is probably a good guess seeing as how a good portion of the RS population fits into this category but I don't see how that has anything to do with the post

Ape atoll is probably better (for me it is a lot more fun so it was definitely better even without pkers)

ok

It took you 3 lines of rocktail to defeat a 3-cb lower acc with no food

Is 80 dungeoneering low? 90? What is low?

That's common sense. It's implied that "best weapon" is actually "best weapon after DA BRONZE DAGGER" unless otherwise stated. :D Exactly:) No, bronze dagger (p+) is the best. (p++ might corrode the dagger)

Since F2P can only pk full rune at best, for #8 probably not unless you later go P2P... idk how F2P staking will work but that might be better