So what's the use of that? It will create seperation & favoritism between users, without a decent reason. I think it's fine now as it is. All the bigger avatar & signature size things are a bad idea, I believe its best to keep everybody - from Member to Admin - on the same line concerning that. The only extra power moderators, crew members, ... have is - well, duh - moderating powers. Creating ranks based solely on voting, and basicly not voting on certain skills like it's done for moderators, is just asking for drama, accusations of favoritism & needless discussion. I just think it's more of an achievement to stand out as a member, between thousands of other members just with your qualities rather then needing a rank for it to proof "You're really trusted!". If you browse the forums, follow the rules & have an opinion I'm sure you don't even need a rank to be considered as trusted. I'm also not in favor of senior member, honoured member, ... ranks like RSCommunity have, because it's firstly tip.it, and so we don't have to copy RSCommunity & also because I'd rather see 2 groups of members - staff members & members. Here on tip it it's easy, or you're a mod/crew/admin/TET, or you're a regular member. No confusion, no separation and everybody has the chance to become everything. It might not look like that, but then it's maybe because of the individuals their qualities rather then the "favoritism" of not being picked.