woopidoo2

Na, I dont. Actually yes, every single day. Im very motivated to promote my work, and I like to post at their Photography forums full of great (and smart) people. Its a great place, well worth a 1 year sub if you ask me.

Still waiting for more :)

The first 3 are basically 'registering' the planes, their sizes, colors, and surroundings. Millions of travellers have photos like these, just to show others they have been at an airport during their trip ;) Artistically there's not much to them, but an airport is not the place to search for interesting points of view I noticed :) Maybe you could crop the 3rd one so you only see the planes and a part of the airport, but like you said, thats not smart to do with a low-res camera. The 4th one is the most interesting of the bunch, the angle is interesting but its a shame you can see the window. The guy thats fueling the plane is quite funny too :) Last sunset pic: One of those situations where the camera decides to expose the sky instead of both the ground and sky, but there's not much you can do about that unless youve got some specialized gear. Its a nice photo, especially because its shot from an airport. Yeah those first 3 were really meant for my personal enjoyment. I liked the angle on the 4th one too, but yes the window just about ruins it. I personally like the way the fourth one just exposed the sky. There's too much else that would have been uncovered if the whole frame was exposed. And no, it's not shot from an airport, it's shot from my house. :D Thanks sir. Your house? I wish I could have a vacation at that location. (I have also seen your backyard pics in OT, from a while ago ;) ) No problem.

The first 3 are basically 'registering' the planes, their sizes, colors, and surroundings. Millions of travellers have photos like these, just to show others they have been at an airport during their trip ;) Artistically there's not much to them, but an airport is not the place to search for interesting points of view I noticed :) Maybe you could crop the 3rd one so you only see the planes and a part of the airport, but like you said, thats not smart to do with a low-res camera. The 4th one is the most interesting of the bunch, the angle is interesting but its a shame you can see the window. The guy thats fueling the plane is quite funny too :) Last sunset pic: One of those situations where the camera decides to expose the sky instead of both the ground and sky, but there's not much you can do about that unless youve got some specialized gear. Its a nice photo, especially because its shot from an airport.

I never knew T-Mobile had this 'account' thing that lets you send photos made by your phone to your account, to be honest. (Automatically or not) And so didnt this guy :)

CS4.. Im sure it has cool new features and all that, but seriously. Do you need them while you have CS3? (Not aimed at anyone.)

For the dutch readers: Sometimes I read my parents' 'De Gelderlander', but I read 'Spits' alot too because I get that paper for free. (You can grab it for free at the train stations) http://www.nu.nl is a nice news website too.

Yes, I remember vididly that someone said that he was going to make a copy of every article, to read them through again in some months. Im not sure who did it, but I do know there are some people out there who own copies.

Haha.. my dogs would always walk into my frame when I tried to photograph something when walking my dogs. And it was on a cycle path, so I had to watch out with cyclists too. AF motor broken? Do you use Nikon gear? MF is pretty fun to shoot with, its hard to get a hang of though. @ New photo: I think thats your best one yet. Technically there's nothing wrong with, maybe the cropping is a bit too tight (some cut off whiskers, small part of the nose) but thats no real issue.

Besides, she hasn't been in this shop for a week at least.... Oh, I didnt know that.

Nice, but I prefered the blue Nike Air Forces. Im trying to find myself a pair like the blue ones, but the choice in Nike Air forces is enormous :shock:

First: I had to look twice before I saw it was a flagpole, the flag is quite far away. I think there's too much cloud compared to the flag, cropping this afterwards could solve that problem. You did think of a good angle, it perfectly enters the frame from below-right but it doesnt end in the middle of the photo, it sort of flows at the right part of the photo. And, while you're photographing a flag, make sure there's some wind so you can photograph it while its waving in the air. ;) Second: The blur doesnt add anything to the photo, and the scene itself is pretty normal too. The lines seem to be straight which is good, but there's not much happening in the photo. Third: The lines disappear in the bottom right corner, which looks good. But again, there's not much going on except for the lines. The colors arent that appealing either, maybe it would look better in black and white. Fourth: I like this one best. It has got rhythm, the colors repeat. You included the blue pole at the left so it fills up that part of the photo, but Im curious about the horizontal pole that is holding the poles together. The cropping is just a bit too tight. Keep it up, I hope I didnt scare you :)

Novice, *looks at signature space* You dont even have a signature.

Danke is german :) No problem, you learn from those situations. You'll know what to do next when you see something like that again. Keep them coming! I will criticise every photo that people post.

I could use a new DA avatar, if I like your version more than the one I made... Description: An avatar, anything photography themed. I use a Canon EOS 350D, something related to that would be nice. Size: 50x50 Subtext: none, Border: Yes, 1px black border.

Alright, there we go :) Image 1: I see a kneeling person and some other black thing (water?) in the background, its quite distracting. He/she kind of ruins the scene that you want to photograph, flowers in a field. The flowers itself look good, sharp and well framed but there's a small gray dead leaf lying there. I usually remove those things, the photo will look better without. Image 2: I kind of dislike the framing. Its very unclear where you are, what you are photographing and what the surroundings are. The shadows look interesting, but I would have liked to see more of the surroundings. Is it a barn, a concrete bunker, factory? Other objects in a dark room like this one are interesting when you are framing, even a simple old chair would have made this a great photo. Last: There is also no depth in this scene, which also had to do with the framing of this scene. Like I said, other objects can improve depth. Image 3: Again, the background is too distracting. I see something metal-ish going on, while the cat is laying down on a soft sheet. Maybe you could have moved a bit more to the left to include more of the cat's eyes, there's alot of 'nose space' present. It doesnt look bad though, but that would have been more interesting.

I came up with this idea, its pretty simple. I like to critique someone else's photos, I mostly do that at Deviantart because of the non-stop photo flow over there. Why not do that at Tip.it, I thought. Got a (new) photo that you would want some constructive critisism on? Post it here and I will say what I think about it. Dont expect me to be positive, Im not here to make you feel better but I want you to improve. Ofcourse, I will tell you if I like it. But there's not a single photograph is 100% perfect after all ;) I also want to stimulate photography here at Tip.it, we are capable of doing much greater things here. Post away, lets see if this becomes a success. Edit: Lol, I can make this into a Sticky if I want to. Must have to do with my de-modding? :)

Good idea. I might make something too, I have to get some recording software first though. Maybe we could keep the course itself 'Tip.it themed', as much as possible.

The colors are interesting, they arent normal but they seem to go well together. I'm not sure which 'feeling' you want to deliver to the reader, what do you want to achieve by using this theme? ;)

College and lack of interest made me quit being a moderator. Ive had a great time serving Tip.it, but I feel that this is the end. I notice I rarely browse Tipit since my 'step back', I dont post like I used to. The Gallery will keep on interesting me though, especially the new photos. If there were no photographers here, Id be gone already.

Look at these bad [wagon] skills.. :thumbdown: A bit too saturated, I see :? I told people I wouldnt be making sigs anymore, but hey, I wanted to so why not. I made this on my laptop, it doesnt contain any downloaded brushes so I had to do it in a different way. From a game called 'Auto Assault'. Never heard of it, but I liked the render.

I never used to buy jeans by brand, I just bought jeans that fit well. But I bought a pair of Levi's 514 jeans when I was in America for a week, and it might sound stupid but they feel amazingly good. Levi's are quite expensive in The Netherlands, which is too bad. -.-

Thanks.. I'm hoping for some more comments though :)

I keep on posting less and less photos these days, especially at Tip.it.. So yes, 1 photo this time, made out of 2 photos. Taken yesterday with a friend of mine, he owns a Canon 400d. I was photographing the traffic on a bridge, while he was to photograph this scene which I totally forgot about. Unfortunately for him, his 400D took quite some time to process the photos he made (~3 minutes for 1 photo, just to save it :shock: ) As you can see, it became a panorama and I didnt expect it to be that way. Im glad it turned out the way it did. Both photos shot at 111 seconds exposure time, aperture f8, ISO 100. [hide=River to the city-Preview]Click on it to see it full sized. [/hide] Too bad I dont have a lens hood for my wide angle lens, Canon sells them for 30 separately so I have to get one. The flare in some photos of the traffic on the bridge itself was just a bit too extreme, but Ill return some time :) Thanks for watching and reading.

Which one did you buy? :)