warri0r45

I hate that children are being brought up in the world with one view on life. Its very narrow minded and i can pretty much tell by how someone talks/presents themselves (even on the net) whether they have been subjected to such narrow minded-ness. On topic: trying to ban a book of fiction is totally wrong. (while she's at it, why not campaign to ban the bible? Oops, did i say that out loud? Whats this? a can of worms?) sorry in advance. :-#

correct. :D

whoa man, thats pretty deep, i feel for you. I would definately agree that teachers dont do [cabbage] about bullying these days (although i never had that problem). Its a culture that just leads to the exasserbation (spelling) of the whole bullying problem. any teacher who stands up for those being bullied has integrity and earns my respect. Any teacher who sits by idoly and pretends it isnt happening is a coward.

-Randy Blithe. (the guy in the hat) :D

meh, its an ill thought out test, really.

he played for the tassie team in the pura cup/sheffield shield didnt he?, so to answer your question, i think so, yes. i prefer XXXX, queenslanders FTW!!

its not a contradiction, actually. It sais that there are no objective moral standards. That dosent mean that he cannot have his own, subjective moral standards (i.e. believe that genocide = evil [or whatever it was]) its similar for the michalangelo one - it says that 'good art' is a matter of opinion, then it sais if you agree with this, its in contradiction with the statement 'michelangelo was a great artist' (i think thats it) which I, and many other people by the looks of it, took as a matter of opinion, not fact. now i got 60% for this, which kind of annoyed me (not that i'd lose any sleep over it), because i am steady in my beliefs and am not unintelligent.

couldnt have said it better, really. Its amazing how you can get a point across with the simplest of examples.

support.. if i havent already...

i dont really idolise anyone, moreso respect what they have done. people whos achievments i respect are musicians, scientists and some philosphers. obviously i have a more specific list, but i'd have to think about that :XD:

:lol: its zinc cream.(or whatever you call it) but obviously, you knew that. :D

i had the same for that one aswell. Its not really accurate in the slightest, and i have reasons for all of my tensions. Over it now but, its just one of thousands of innacurate internet tests.

fair enough. If you like ill change: to: some genetic predispositions can be taken advantage of to commit wrong acts. Other than that, we didnt evolve to be wrong. as for this, i agree, because i wasnt saying that anything one species does is ok for another, i was referring entirely to humans.

a taswiegan ey? mush be super-proud of Ricky Ponting. He is tha bomb. :D

never experienced those symptoms yet, im 18 now.

the ending is better. But i dont like the singing in either of them.

to me, something that is biologically natural cant really be wrong. I welcome someone to change my mind but...

yeah, i agree. So im not a crazy hypocrite ey? (60%) :lol:

dosent mean its wrong either....

best: coke :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: worst: pepsi max :-X :-X :-X

impressive 8-) better than me :XD: i can always give my results and show why i dont think they contradict. meh.

dont be so hard on yourself. i didnt read it all, but from what i did, it seems you'd write a pretty decent book. i like the choice of song on the kid's ipod too 8-) RATM FTW.

sorry, just added it.

take this test to find out - test The higher the percentage you score at the end, the more your views contradict when given certain situations. When i took this test, i was surprised, i scored 60%(above average), although i believe i have reasons for this. what do you score?

do you upgrade your towers? Try to study the pictures in this topic and see where people place thier towers. Its simple when you get the hang of it (to get it to a level like 70-80ish)