bedman

I wouldn't care because I've never played that much a day. (max is like 6-8 hours or so, and happens very very unoften). Looking at it from one side, it might not be bad because seriously, anyone who plays a game more than 8 hours a day regularly isn't doing himself very good. Also, it would stop some goldfarmers, if they still exist, from having to play 12h+ a day. (playing on different accounts would solve the problem though). On the other hand, like others have stated, it is'nt jagex role to decide how much we play. I think I opt for the first option. Why? 1) I think anybody here agrees that 8 hours or more a day on a daily basis is BAD. You are addicted, and you're playing much more than what's good for you. You can't fulfill your job decently, or can't go to school decently at that rate. So we can all decide that we should encourage those people to play less, right? We've got one group of people who say it's the parents job to tell their kids to play less, or the wife to tell the husband, or whatever. This is all nice and fine, but sometimes telling them is not enough. The only way you can ensure that it doesn't happen is by makign the game don't work. I mean, how many times were you in this situation: "Son, time to go to bed!" "No ma, let me just finish this slayer task" "To bed, now!" "Just a moment" etcc... Imagine runescape auto-logging you out not and not permitting you to log in. Works quite a bit better, right?

Haha, first trying to be cool with your 3rd age melee while it was crashing, and then selling it anyway. Kind of hypocrite?

bumpidy bump

Why are you protecting magic and wearing karils? KBD's magic attacks are not magic defense based from what I heard (zarfot) and you shouln't be praying magic anyway (protect from melee).

HP bar makes me think of another game, pokemon or something, not sure :D

afk'ing orks is over, yay.

Okay, you called it, but still after that you said you'd expect them to rise 2-3 updates. Not exactly what happened. Anyway, this crash makes me feel a little better :-).

Wasn't so sure of that. I mean, they've been 50m or whatever for months, and considered as junk. For the limited use it has, that is indeed the price that it's worth to me, 50m.

ffffffffffffffffffs. I sold my spectrals a few days ago for min, no complaints. Was hesitating about my 2 arcanes because selling at min would be a 15 mill loss. Yesterday I decided to sell em for min... :wall: :wall: :wall: :wall:

is that supposed to be funny?

Did some ice blitz combos before, but tried a bit of ice barrage and blood barrage for the theoretic max (30-29). Came pretty close, I must say: I hit 30-29 today, but was too late for screeny! FFS! (I only got the second 29)

There is no difference with ags or sgs, wich are both useless, but for their special. I'm really confused on why you are asking this. You've used a gs before, so are you just asking wether BGS spec is worth it for slayer? The obvious answer is no, since you will kill the monster 3 sec later, making lowering his defence extremely pointless.

with 2000 skill total, all your skills should be around 80 and that's when certain skills can get very tedious to lvl up.

Cause slayer is a [bleep] to train, and the highest req for a new monster is 90. ~7M exp of killing the same thing, over and over, gets old fast. Actually, slayer is one of the skills that has a decent reward up until high lvls. Look at woodcutting, it basicly stops at 60, 75 if you are stupid enough to cut mages. However, I do agree that Jagex should cater more to higher lvls in general. There are tons of low lvl rewards, and things to do for low lvls. And 300k people (just a guess) have 78 woodcutting, however, they are stuck at a lvl 40 tree (willow, and whatever lvl teak is) for efficiënt training...

gratz to the helm, but omfg you buyed full bandos before fury and zerker? -.- zerker +4 str for only 1,5m bandos chest, +4 str for 13m tassets. +2 for 12m fury is alot better than glory for only 2m? I dont blame him for not buying a fury, after all, def doesnt matter that much if he uses a bunyip or any other healing familiar/ terrorbird with food, but using a warrior rings instead of a zerker or a wealth is kinda strange :| Why is that strange. +4 str or +4 slash. Both are about equal, however a zerker is 1.5M where a warrior is 100k.

My 2 spectrals have been sold at min, so no loss there. Now I'm left with 2 arcanes, which I refuse to sell at min (would be 15 mill loss). Would it go much lower than this?

Yay, one spectral sold for min. One more to go. Arcane aint selling though (tried med, since I bought med and max :evil: ). I guess I might just keep those, or at least one (for own use at rock lobsters). Btw, Calzo, do you still have your other 2 arcanes? Just wondering.

God, how do you always get the best out of a deal. Yesterday I was happy, drooling over my potential 20-100m profit, now I'm stuck with my arcanes and spectrals not selling for min. Let's hope a real merching clan picks em up :-) And let's all hate Calzo, lol.

I know :-)

wow, 7k blues :o

summoning, trimmed or untrimmed doesn't matter.

I think most people use guthan for tanking actually.

Now you just need to compare it to a godsword. But remember you are maxed out mostly and so you can hit the demons the majority of the time anyway. But the whip stinks for people around my level. And it's hard to pray flash. P.S. borrow a godsword. A lot of times you use the arguement of your "low stats" to explain why a godsword is better. I really don't think those 3-6 lvls will make all that much of a difference. If you were 80-80-80, then we would be talking. Just wanted to point that out :-)

None of them, seriously. You dont *need* a 99, trust me.

Thanks to my new spectral, yay for max mage def? (not counting pvp armour) Also did a price check with a few expensives I had in bank. Always fun to impress friends :D